Abstract
One of the important advantages of the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) is the time saved in comparison with the conventional system. A group of 100 radiologic studies done in a conventional radiology department is compared with another group of the same number done in a completely filmless PACS department to assess the difference in the radiologist report turnaround time. There was a statistically significant (P<.00001) decrease in the median imaging-to-dictation time (IDT) of the PACS group (3 hours and 40 minutes) in comparison with the pre-PACS group (25 hours and 19 minutes). This can be attributed to the fact that PACS eliminates all the workload associated with hard copy films, thus, improving the department’s efficiency and decreasing the number of lost films.
Key Words: picture archiving and communication system (PACS), radiology information systems, computer systems
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (611.6 KB).
References
- 1.Honeyman JC, Frost MM, Huda W. Picture archiving and communication system. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 1994;23:101–160. doi: 10.1016/0363-0188(94)90004-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bauman RA, Gell G, Dwyer SJ. Large picture archiving and communication systems of the world—Part 1. J Digit Imaging. 1996;9:99–103. doi: 10.1007/BF03168603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bauman RA, Gell G, Dwyer SJ. Large picture archiving and communication systems of the world—Part 2. J Digit Imaging. 1996;9:172–177. doi: 10.1007/BF03168603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Becker SH, Arenson RL. Costs and benefits of picture archiving and communication systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1:361–371. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95153424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, et al. Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists. Radiology. 1998;207:481–485. doi: 10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Inamura K, Umeda T, Harauchi H, et al. Time and flow study results before and after installation of a hospital information system and radiology information system and before clinical use of a picture archiving and communication system. J Digit Imaging. 1997;10:1–9. doi: 10.1007/BF03168543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cook JF, Hansen M, Breitweser J. Optimising radiology in the new picture archiving and communication system environment. J Digit Imaging. 1997;10(3 Suppl 1):165–167. doi: 10.1007/BF03168687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Watkins J, et al. Radiology report times: Impact of picture archiving and communication systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:1153–1159. doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.5.9574575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Excel 97, 1997, Microsoft Corporation
- 10.Stata 5.0, 1997, Stata Corporation, Texas 77840, USA
- 11.Mattern CW, King BF, Hangiandreou NJ, et al. Electronic imaging impact on image and report turnaround times. J Digit Imaging. 1999;12(Suppl 1):155–159. doi: 10.1007/BF03168787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tamm EP, Raval B, West OC, et al. Evaluating the impact of workstation usage on radiology report times in the initial 6 months following installation. J Digit Imaging. 1999;12(2 Suppl 1):152–154. doi: 10.1007/BF03168786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]