Skip to main content
The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society logoLink to The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society
. 2010 Aug 5;10(1):71–74. doi: 10.1007/s13191-010-0006-0

Fabrication of temporary speech bulb prosthesis: A clinical report

K Kasim Mohamed 1,, V Anand Kumar 1, N Devi 1, T V Padmanaban 1
PMCID: PMC3453169  PMID: 23204726

Abstract

Maxillofacial prosthesis is an art and science which not only replaces the lost structure sometimes it restores the functions also. Pharyngeal obturator is a prosthesis which closes the palatal and pharyngeal defects and improving the speech and other function. The following case report discusses palatopharyngeal insufficiency, impression procedures, fabrication of prosthesis and improvements in speech.

Keywords: Temporary pharyngeal obturator, Speech bulb prosthesis

References

  • 1.Marsh J.L. Management of velopharyngeal dysfunction. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14:621–628. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200309000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tachimura T., et al. Change in levator veli palatine muscle activity for patients with cleft palate in association with placement of a speech aid prosthesis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39:503–508. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569(2002)039<0503:CILVPM>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dosumu O.O., Ogunrinde T.J., Ogundipe O.T. Prosthetic management of soft palate cleft. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2006;35:391–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yoshida H., Michi K., Yamashita Y., Ohno K. A comparison of surgical and prosthetic treatment for speech disorders attributable to surgically acquired soft palate defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;51:361–365. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80345-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Birnbach S. Physiologic recording of soft palate for fabrication of obturator speech prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;39:539–545. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80190-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yoshida H., et al. Prosthetic treatment for speech disorders due to surgically acquired maxillary defects. J Oral Rehabil. 1990;17:565–571. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1990.tb01427.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Paul G., Harlan B. A supportive type prosthetic speech aid. J Prosthet Dent. 1958;8:362–369. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(58)90169-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Warren D. A physiologic approach to cleft palate prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1965;15:770–778. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(65)90051-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wood M.T., Warren D.W. Effect of cleft palate prostheses on respiratory effort. J Prosthet Dent. 1971;26:213–218. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(71)90055-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marshell R.C., Jones R.N. Effects of palatal lift prosthesis upon speech intelligibility of dysarthric patients. J Prosthet Dent. 1971;25:327–333. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(71)90195-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES