Abstract
The effectiveness of a hospital information system (HIS) and a radiological information system (RIS) was evaluated to optimize preparation for the planned full clinical operation of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS), which is now linked experimentally to the HIS and the RIS. One thousand IC (integrated circuit) cards were used for time studies and flow studies in the hospital. Measurements were performed on image examination order entry, image examination, reporting, and image delivery times. Even though after the HIS and the RIS operation only a small amount of time savings were realized in each time fraction component, such as in the patient movement time, examination time, and film delivery time, the total turn-around time was shortened markedly, by more than 23 hours on average. It was verified that the HIS and the RIS was beneficial in the outpatient clinics of the orthopedic department. Our method of measurement employing IC cards before and after HIS and RIS operations can be applied in other hospitals.
Key Words: technology assessment, picture archiving and communication system (PACS), radiological information system (RIS), hospital information system (HIS), radiological reporting, computers, radiology
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).
References
- 1.Kondoh H, Ikezoe J, Inamura K, et al. Developing a new picture archiving and communication system for the new Osaka University Hospital. J Dig Imaging. 1994;7:172–176. doi: 10.1007/BF03168535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kondoh H, Ikezoe J, Inamura K, et al. Initial data-element selection for the evaluation of picture archiving and communication system performance. J Digit Imaging. 1994;7:177–182. doi: 10.1007/BF03168536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kondoh H, Ikezoe J, Inamura K, et al. A comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and hard copy of computed radiography in full and two-thirds size in detection of interstitial lung disease. J Digit Imaging. 1994;7:193–195. doi: 10.1007/BF03168539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gennip E, Rechid R, Broeck R, et al. TEASS: Evaluation of PACS in three European hospitals: First results and recommendations. Proc SPIE Medical Imaging. 1994;2165:501–508. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Keen J, et al. Technology assessment of PACS: Measurement and analysis of radiologists reporting times when reporting from film. Proc SPIE Medical Imaging. 1994;2165:820–826. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gitlin JN, Schilling RB: IMAC Technology Assessment. Proceedings of SCAR 94. Comput Appl Assist Radiol 483–486, 1994
- 7.Inamura K, Satoh K, Kondoh H, et al. Technology assessment of PACS in Osaka University Hospital. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1994;43:85–91. doi: 10.1016/0169-2607(94)90192-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Satoh K, Umeda T, Inamura K, et al. Time study and flow study for technology assessment of PACS. Proc SPIE Medical Imaging. 1994;2165:827–838. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Inamura K, Satoh K, Kondoh H, et al: Technology assessment of PACS: Case study of the new Osaka University Hospital. Comput Assist Radiol 191–196, 1993