Abstract
With the advent of teleradiology and picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), the expense and time required for image transmission and long term image archiving become important. The use of validated image compression algorithms can greatly reduce these costs. A lossy, multispectral image compression scheme at compression ratios (CR) of 25∶1 and 32∶1 was used for a set of 26 different patient MR exams. The original and compressed/decompressed (CD) image sets were evaluated in a blinded fashion by four radiologists in two phases. The main objective was to determine whether radiologic interpretation would vary between the two types of CD image sets and the corresponding originals. In general, the compression algorithm caused a slight decrease in image quality; however, the interpretation of pathology did not change between the original and CD image sets. In only one case at the maximum CR=32 did one of four radiologists change the interpretation of pathology after CD. In this study, lossy multispectral image compression of MR images at CR=25 maintained diagnostic integrity. This could play a significant role in image storage and communications.
Key Words: Image compression, magnetic resonance imaging, telemedicine, image quality
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.0 MB).
Footnotes
This research was supported in part by a biomedical engineering research grant from the Whitaker Foundation.
References
- 1.Cahill PT, Vullo T. Picture archiving and communications systems: Status, problems, and needs. Information Display. 1996;12:36–40. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aberle D, Gleeson F, Sayre JW, et al. The effect of irreversible image compression on diagnostic accuracy in thoracic imaging. Invest Radiol. 1993;28:398–403. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199305000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wong S, Zaremba L, Gooden D, et al. Radiologic Image Compression: A Review. Proc IEEE. 1995;83:194–219. doi: 10.1109/5.364466. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goldberg MA, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith WW, et al. Applications of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:463–468. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.2.8037051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hu JH, Wang Y, Cahill PT. Multispectral code excited linear prediction coding and its applications in magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans Image Processing. 1997;6:1555–1566. doi: 10.1109/83.641415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kleijn WB, Paliwal KK, editors. Speech Coding and Synthesis. New York, NY: Elsevier; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:69–73. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199407143310201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cosman PC, Tseng C, Gray RM, et al. Tree-structured vector quantization of CT, chest scans: Image quality and diagnostic accuracy. IEEE Trans Medical Imaging. 1993;12:703–709. doi: 10.1109/42.251124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]