Abstract
We compare four different three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction methods of spiral computed tomography (CT) data for head and neck cancer to establish the method best suited for specific uses, eg, staging of lymph nodes and viewing of spatial relationships between the tumor, fascial spaces, adjacent soft tissues, and others structures. We evaluated a series of 10 patients (six men and four women), aged 32 to 60 years. Of these, five were histologically diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma, two with lymphoma, one with thyroid cancer, one with Kikuchi’s disease or necrotizing lymphadenitis, and one with esthesioneuroblastoma. All scans were obtained using highresolution spiral CT (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). The collimations used were 3 mm and 5 mm, matrix 512 × 512, and reconstruction interval not more than 3 mm. Scanning was performed from the skull base to the aortic arch. Iodinated contrast medium was injected so that the blood vessels were clearly differentiated from nodes. Different techniques of three-dimensional reconstruction were employed, including shaded surface display (SSD), multiplanar reconstructions (MPR), maximum intensity projection (MIP), 3D volume rendering (VR), and combined techniques. The reconstructions were performed in a variety of planes, including sagittal, coronal, and oblique views. In our series of selected patients, the technique of 3D VR showed potential advantages over other techniques. The MIP technique was useful in analyzing the patency of vessels and to exclude thrombus, compression, or displacement by tumor. The use of combined techniques such as SSD and MPR, accurately demonstrated the levels of lymph nodes and the relationship between the tumor projection of interest and various anatomic structures. In conclusion, 3D reconstruction of CT data is useful in the localization and staging of neck tumors and assists in surgical planning and radiation treatment.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.3 MB).
References
- 1.Johnson JT. A surgeon looks at cervical lymph nodes. Radiology. 1990;175:607–610. doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.3.2188292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mancuso AA, Harnsberger HR, Maruki A, et al. Computed tomography of cervical and retropharyngeal lymph nodes: Normal anatomy, variants and applications in staging head and neck cancer. II Pathology. Radiology. 1983;148:715–723. doi: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nason RW, Sako K, Beecroft WA, et al. Surgical management of squamous cell carcinoma of the floor of the mouth. Am J Surg. 1989;158:292–296. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90118-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Snyderman NL, Johnson JT, Schramm VL, et al. Extracapsular spread of carcinoma in cervical lymph nodes. Cancer. 1985;56:1597–1599. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19851001)56:7<1597::AID-CNCR2820560722>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Curtin HD, Ishwaran H, Mancuso AA, et al. Comparison of CT and MR imaging in staging of neck metastasis. Radiology. 1998;207:123–130. doi: 10.1148/radiology.207.1.9530307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Napel SA. Basic principles of spiral CT. In: Fishman EK, Jeffrey RB, editors. Spiral CT. Principle, Techniques and Clinical Application. ed 2. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. pp. 3–15. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Goitein M. The utility of computed tomography in radiation therapy: An estimate of outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979;5:1799–1807. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(79)90563-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fishman EK, Magid D, Ney DR, et al. Three-dimensional imaging. Radiology. 1991;181:321–337. doi: 10.1148/radiology.181.2.1789832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kalender WA, Polacin A. Physical performance characteristics of spiral CT scanning. Med Phys. 1991;18:910–915. doi: 10.1118/1.596607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rubin GD. Three-dimensional helical CT angiography. Radiographics. 1994;14:905–912. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.14.4.7938777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brink JA, Heiken JP, Wang G, et al. Principle and technical considerations. Radiographics. 1994;14:887–893. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.14.4.7938775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Udupa JK. Computer aspects of 3D imaging in medicine: A tutorial. In: Uduap JK, Herman GT, editors. 3D Imaging. ed 2. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 1999. pp. 2–69. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Prokop M, Shin H, Schanz A, et al. Use of maximum intensity projections in CT angiography: A basic review. Radiographics. 1997;17:433–451. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.17.2.9084083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Drebin RA, Carpenter L, Hanrahan P. Volume rendering. Comput Graph. 1988;22:65–74. doi: 10.1145/378456.378484. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pelizzari CA, Grzeszczuk R, Chen GTY. Volumetric visualization of anatomy for treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;34:205–211. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00272-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Som PM. Lymph nodes. In: Som PM, Curtin HD, editors. Head and Neck Imaging. ed 3. St Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book; 1996. pp. 772–793. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ramsey RG. Neuroradiology. ed 3. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1994. Neck; pp. 691–691. [Google Scholar]