Abstract
The contrast-detail characteristic of a display system is a powerful tool for evaluating displayed image quality. It takes into account the physical properties of the display, the psychophysical aspects of the observer, and the viewing conditions. It is a more sensitive measurement of the displayed image quality than a simple Society of Motion Picture and Television (SMPTE) pattern. Yet, it is relatively simple to measure and requires no special equipment or analysis tools. In this presentation, the results of the evaluation of several cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors and a digital projector will be presented. Contrast-detail characteristics of these display devices were measured under various gamma and display settings. The results show excellent intraobserver and interobserver variance (<1 step on the grayscale). Extraneous light, such as room lighting, affects the contrast threshold more severely at low background levels more than at high background. Gamma settings on graphics adapters affect the shapes of the contrast-detail curve for all display types. Gamma settings of approximately 2.0 result in a better contrast threshold for both high and low background brightness. The results show complex differences in contrast-detail characteristics for different display types. The digital projector display not only has significantly worse performance than CRT monitors, but also is affected more by extraneous light. High-brightness monitors with optimal monitor and graphics adapter settings have better performance than color or low-brightness monitors. However, under some settings, the performance of high-brightness monitors is not always better at all object sizes and background levels.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (896.0 KB).
References
- 1.Roehrig H, Willis CE, Damento MA. Characterization of monochrome CRT display systems in the field. J Digit Imaging. 1999;12:152–165. doi: 10.1007/BF03168851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Metter RV, Zhao B, Kohm K. The sensitivity of visual targets for display quality assessment. Proc SPIE. 1999;3658:254–268. doi: 10.1117/12.349437. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hangiandreou NJ, Fetterly KA, Bemats SN, et al. Quantitative evaluation of overall electronic display quality. J Digit Imaging. 1998;11:180–186. doi: 10.1007/BF03168299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Krupinski EA, Roehrig H. Influence of monitor luminance and tone scale on observers’ search and dwell patterns. Proc SPIE. 1999;3663:151–156. doi: 10.1117/12.349636. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hemminger BM, et al. Effect of display luminance on the feature detection rates of masses in mammograms. Med Phys. 1999;26:2266–2272. doi: 10.1118/1.598740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang J, Langer S. A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for PACS. J Digit Imaging. 1997;10:158–168. doi: 10.1007/BF03168838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Blume H, Roehrig H, Brown M, et al. Comparison of the physical performance of high resolution CRT displays and films recorded by laser image printers and displayed on light-boxes and the need for a display standard. Proc SPIE. 1990;1232:97–114. doi: 10.1117/12.18846. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Blume H, Hemminger BM. Image presentation in digital radiology: Perspectives on the emerging DICOM display function standard and its application. Radiographics. 1997;17:769–777. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.17.3.9153711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Spekovius G. Characterization of color CRT display systems for monochrome applications. J Digit Imaging. 1999;12:102–113. doi: 10.1007/BF03168629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Song KS, Lee JS, Kim HY, et al. Effect of monitor luminance on the detection of solitary pulmonary nodule: ROC analysis. Proc SPIE. 1999;3663:212–216. doi: 10.1117/12.349644. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.American College of Radiology-National Electrical Manufacturers Association DICOM Working Group, 11 report, 1998 (http://medical.nema.org/dicom/.1998)