Skip to main content
Journal of Digital Imaging logoLink to Journal of Digital Imaging
. 1998 Aug;11(Suppl 1):39–41. doi: 10.1007/BF03168256

DICOM versus HL7 for modality interfacing

Herman Oosterwijk 1,
PMCID: PMC3453402  PMID: 9735430

Abstract

Digital modalities such as CT, MRI, Ultrasound and Computerized Radiography systems, generating softcopy images to be used by a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS), need to identify the images properly in order to retrieve and manage them. In many cases, a technologist re-enters patient demographic and study related information at the modality, even although it is usually already present somewhere in the hospital Information System (IS). In order to achieve a higher level of efficiency and uniquely identify the created image objects, it is obvious that an interface between the IS and modality to exchange this information is highly desired. There are two options for a modality vendor to implement an IS interface, either using the Health Level (HL7) or Digital Imaging Communication in Medicine (DICOM) communication standard. This paper will explain characteristics of both protocols, and demonstrate that it is preferred to use DICOM versus HL7. In addition, it will show that DICOM is, supported by most modality vendors, based on the result of a poll of their Modality Worklist versus HL7, support.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (457.8 KB).

Footnotes

Partly sponsored by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Silver Spring, MD.


Articles from Journal of Digital Imaging are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES