Conclusions
Many of the challenges that we encountered may be overcome through experience, proper configuration of system, and further software enhancements. The overwhelming benefits of improved image access and immediate consultations create a demand for CR, even with sub-optimal images. The challenge for radiology departments is to execute a deliberate implementation of CR, ensuring that we produce the best quality images without greater radiation dose to the patient.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (452.6 KB).
References
- 1.Willis CE, Mercier J, Patel M: Modification of conventional quality assurance procedures to accommodate computed radiography. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Computer Applications in Radiology. Denver, CO, 1996, pp 275–280
- 2.Huda W, Slone RM, Belden CJ, et al. Mottle on computed radiographs of the chest in pediatric patients. Radiology. 1996;199:249–252. doi: 10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Persons K, Palisson P, Manduca A, et al. An analytical look at the effects of compression on medical images. J Digit Imaging. 1997;10(suppl):60–66. doi: 10.1007/BF03168659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Arthur RJ, Pease JN. Problems associated with digital luminescence radiography in the neonate and young infant. Pediatr Radiol. 1992;22:5–7. doi: 10.1007/BF02011600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cohen MD, Katz BP, Kalasinski LA, et al. Digital imaging with a photostimulable phosphor in the chest of newborns. Radiology. 1991;181:829–832. doi: 10.1148/radiology.181.3.1947105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Don S, Albertina MJ, Ammann DL, et al. Soft-copy computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: Cost-savings analysis. Radiology. 1995;197:501–505. doi: 10.1148/radiology.197.2.7480702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]