Abstract
Aims
To investigate the various indications for the removal of impacted lower third molars in a dental school in Libya.
Methods
The records of all patients who underwent a surgical removal of a lower third molar over a 3 year period were reviewed retrospectively. The indications for removal were classified into 10 groups. Radiographs were also studied to determine angular position as well as pathologies associated with such teeth. Age, gender and chief complaint of all patients were recorded.
Results
The results were based on the data of 439 patients who had their third molars removed (Male-183; Female-256). 61% of patients were in the age groups 15–24. Recurrent pericoronitis was found to be the most common indication recorded (54%), followed by pulpitis/caries of the 3rd/2nd molar (31%). Orthodontic reasons (2%) and cysts/tumours (5%) were among the other indications recorded. Pain and tenderness was recorded as the most common symptom. The relative absence of prophylactic removal as an indication could be attributed to socioeconomic and logistic reasons.
Conclusion
Awareness of the indications for removal of impacted lower third molars will help in management of such patients. A fear of dentistry appears to be responsible for patients reporting to the dental surgeon only when symptoms occur. Patients generally do not agree to prophylactic removal of lower third molars. Removal of only symptomatic lower third molars seems to be the logical choice in view of financial and manpower constraints in developing nations.
Keywords: Indications, Lower third molars, Retrospective
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (60.6 KB).
References
- 1.Peterson L.J. Principles of management of impacted teeth. In: Peterson L. J., Ellis E. III, Hupp J.R., Tucker M., editors. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. Mosby: Missouri; 2003. pp. 184–213. [Google Scholar]
- 2.National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE): Guidelines for wisdom tooth removal(updated November 2003). available at:http://www.nice.org.uk
- 3.Goldberg M.H., Nemarich A.N., Marco W.P. The impacted third molar: Referral patterns, patient compliance and surgical requirements. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983;107(3):439–441. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Al-Khateeb T.H., Bataineh A.B. Pathology associated with impacted mandibular third molars in a group of Jordanians. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64(11):1598–1602. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lysell L., Rohlin M.A. Study of indications used for removal of mandibular third molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988;17(3):161–164. doi: 10.1016/S0901-5027(88)80022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Saglam A.A., Tuzum M.S. Clinical and radiologic investigations of the incidence, complications and suitable removal times for fully impacted teeth in the Turkish population. Quintessence Int. 2003;34(1):53–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McArdle L.W., Renton T.F. Distal cervical caries in mandibular second molar: An indication for prophylactic removal of third molar? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;44(1):42–45. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nordenram A., Hultin M., Kjellman O., Ramstrom G. Indications for surgical removal of mandibular third molar. study of 2,630 cases. Swed Dent J. 1987;11(1–2):23–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lieldholm R., Knutsson K., Lysell L., Rohlin M. Mandibular third molars: oral surgeon’s assessment of the indications for removal. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;37(6):440–443. doi: 10.1054/bjom.1999.0184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Richardson M.E. Late lower arch crowding: the aetiology reviewed. Dent Update. 2002;29(5):234–238. doi: 10.12968/denu.2002.29.5.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lindauer S.J., Laskin D.M., Tufekci E., Taylor R.S., Cushing B.J., Best A.M. Orthodontists’ and surgeons’ opinions on the role of third molars as a cause of dental crowding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(1):43–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sewerin I., Wowern N.A. radiographic four year follow up study of asymptomatic mandibular third molars in young adults. Int Dent J. 1990;40(1):24–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Linden W., Cleaton-Jones P., Lownie M. Diseases and lesions associated with third molars. Review of 1001 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;79(2):142–145. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(05)80270-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]