Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery logoLink to Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery
. 2009 Nov 21;8(3):224–229. doi: 10.1007/s12663-009-0055-2

Assessment of shoulder function after functional neck dissection and selective neck dissection (Levels I, II, III) in patients with carcinoma of tongue: a comparative study

B Rajendra Prasad 1, S M Sharma 1, S Thomas 1, Paul Sabastian 1, Sanghvi Aashal 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC3454242  PMID: 23139513

Abstract

Background and objectives

To compare shoulder function with respect to pain and disability in patients who have undergone nerve sparing neck dissection i.e. selective neck dissection (levels I, II, III) and functional neck dissection as a part of their treatment modality for carcinoma tongue on a follow up of minimum six months.

Material and methods

A total of 100 patients were selected for this study. 50 patients who had undergone selective neck dissection (levels I, II, III) and 50 who underwent functional neck dissection as a part of their treatment modality for squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue from January 2005 to January 2007 were asked to participate in this study. A standardized questionnaire was used to assess pain and disability. Pain and disability scores were then compared between the two nerve sparing dissections.

Results

100% of the patients in Selective Neck Dissection (SND) (levels I, II, III) group and in Functional Neck Dissection (FND) groups complained of pain. Though there is pain present in both the treatment groups, no significant difference in the pain values was found between FND and SND (levels I, II, III) in any of the pain parameters. Disability was present in both the treatment groups. However patients who have undergone FND had significantly higher severity of disability when compared to SND (levels I, II, III) especially during activities which involve shoulder abduction like dressing, doing heavy household work, hair wash and washing clothes/dishes (5.18, 5.22, 5.5, 4.88 in FND and 2.26, 4.08, 4.58, 2.2 in SND (levels I, II, III) respectively. Disability perceived during other activities like doing heavy household and facial care was 2.08 and 1.84 in both the treatment groups respectively.

Interpretation and Conclusion

Degree of shoulder morbidity is much higher in patients who have undergone FND as compared to SND (levels I, II, III) as a treatment modality for carcinoma tongue, even though both the treatment options are nerve preserving.

Keywords: Nerve sparing, Neck dissections, Shoulder morbidities, Shoulder abduction

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (83.2 KB).

References

  • 1.Boring C.C., Squires T.S., Tong T. Cancer statistics, 1993. CA Cancer J Clin. 1993;43(1):7–26. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.43.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Parkin D.M., Muir C.S., Laara E. World Health Organization and International Agency for Research 313131on Cancer, Biennial Report 1986–87. Lyon, France: 1ARC; 1987. Global burden of cancer; p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shah J.P. Cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract. In: Alfonso A.E., Gardner 8., editors. The practice of cancer surgery. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1982. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Butlin H.I., Spencer W.G. Diseases of the tongue. 2. London: Cassell; 1900. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Crile G. Excision of cancer of the head and neck. JAMA. 1906;47:1780–1786. doi: 10.1001/jama.258.22.3286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Martin H. The treatment of cervical metastatic cancer. Ann Surg. 1941;114(6):972–985. doi: 10.1097/00000658-194112000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Martin H., Valle B., Enrlich H., Cahan E.G. Neck dissection. Cancer. 1951;4:441–499. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(195105)4:3<441::AID-CNCR2820040303>3.0.CO;2-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nahum A.M., Mullally W., Marmor L. A syndrome resulting from radical neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol. 1961;74:424–428. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1961.00740030433011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ballantyne A.J., Guinn G.A. Reduction of shoulder disability after neck dissection. Am J Surg. 1966;112(5):662–665. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(66)90100-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Short S.O., Kaplan J.N., Laramore G.E., Cummings C.W. Shoulder pain and function after neck dissection with or without preservation of the spinal accessory nerve. Am J Surg. 1984;148(4):478–482. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90373-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schuller D.E., Reiches N.A., Hamaker R.C., Lingeman R.E., Weisberger E.C., Suen J.Y., Conley J.J., Kelly D.R., Miglets A.W. Analysis of disability resulting from treatment including radical neck dissection or modified neck dissection. Head Neck Surg. 1983;6(1):551–558. doi: 10.1002/hed.2890060103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Byers R.M. Modified neck dissection: a study of 967 cases from 1970 to 1980. Am J Surg. 1985;150(4):414–421. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(85)90146-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Robbins K.T., Clayman G., Levine P.A., Medina J., Sessions R., Shaha A., Som P., Wolf G.T. Neck dissection classification update: revisions proposed by the American Head and Neck Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(7):751–758. doi: 10.1001/archotol.128.7.751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Heijden G.J., Leffers P., Bouter L.M. Shoulder disability questionnaire design and responsiveness of a functional status measure. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(1):29–38. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00078-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Suurmeijer T.P., Doeglas D.M., Moum T., Briancon S., Krol B., Sanderman R., Guillemin F., Bjelle A., Heuvel W.J. The Groningen Activity Restriction Scale for measuring disability: it’s utility in international comparisons. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(8):1270–1273. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.84.8.1270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Krause H.R., Bremerich A., Herrmann M. The innervation of the trapezius muscle in connection with radical neck-dissection. An anatomical study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1991;19(2):87–89. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80613-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Leipzig B., Suen J.Y., English J.L., Barnes J., Hooper M. Functional evaluation of the spinal accessory nerve after neck dissection. Am J Surg. 1983;146(4):526–530. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(83)90246-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jesse R.H., Ballantyne A.J., Larson D. Radical or modified neck dissection: a therapeutic dilemma. Am J Surg. 1978;136(4):516–519. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(78)90273-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Robbins K.T., Medina J.E., Wolfe G.T., Levine P.A., Sessions R.B., Pruet C.W. Standardizing neck dissection terminology. Official report of then Academy’s Committee for Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117(6):601–605. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870180037007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Saunders J.R., Jr, Hirata R.M., Jaques D.A. Considering the spinal accessory nerve in head and neck surgery. Am J Surg. 1985;150(4):491–494. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(85)90161-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pinsolle V., Michelet V., Majoufre C., Caix P., Siberchicot F., Pinsolle J. Spinal accessory nerve and lymphatic neck dissection. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1997;98(3):138–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Patten C., Hillel A.D. The 11th nerve syndrome. Accessory nerve palsy or adhesive capsulitis? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(2):215–220. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1993.01880140105016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cantlon G.E., Gluckman J.L. Sternoclavicular joint hypertrophy following radical neck dissection. Head Neck Surg. 1983;5(3):218–221. doi: 10.1002/hed.2890050306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nori S., Soo K.C., Green R.F., Strong E.W., Miodownik S. Utilization of intraoperative electroneurography to understand the innervation of the trapezius muscle. Muscle Nerve. 1997;20(3):279–285. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199703)20:3<279::AID-MUS3>3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Saunders W.H., Johnson E.W. Rehabilitation of the shoulder after radical neck dissection. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1975;84(6):812–816. doi: 10.1177/000348947508400613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brown H., Burns S., Kaiser C.W. The spinal accessory nerve plexus, the trapezius muscle, and shoulder stabilization after radical neck cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 1988;208(5):654–661. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198811000-00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Soo K.C., Guiloff R.J., Oh A., Rovere G.Q., Westbury G. Innervation of the trapezius muscle: a study in patients undergoing neck dissections. Head Neck. 1990;12(6):488–495. doi: 10.1002/hed.2880120607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sist T., Miner M., Lema M. Characteristics of postradical neck pain syndrome: a report of 25 cases. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999;18(2):95–102. doi: 10.1016/S0885-3924(99)00054-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wilgen C.P., Dijkstra P.U., Laan B.F., Plukker J.T., Roodenburg J.L. Shoulder complaints after nerve sparing neck dissections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;33(3):253–257. doi: 10.1006/ijom.2003.0507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kuntz A.L., Weymuller E.A., Jr Impact of neck dissection on quality of life. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(8):1334–1338. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199908000-00030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cappiello J., Piazza C., Giudice M., Maria G., Nicolai P. Shoulder disability after different selective neck dissection (Levels II–IV versus Levels II–V): A comparative study. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(2):259–263. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000154729.31281.da. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Krause H.R. Shoulder-armsyndrome after radical neck dissection: its relation with the innervation of the trapezius muscle. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;21(5):276–279. doi: 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80735-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES