The interconversion of isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP, 1) and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP, 2) by isopentenyl diphosphate:dimethylallyl diphosphate isomerase (IDI) is a key reaction in the synthesis of the building blocks for isoprenoid compounds.[1] Two structurally unrelated types of IDI have been identified. The type I enzyme (IDI-1) is a zinc metalloprotein that also requires Mg2+ for activity.[2] It employs appropriate active site amino acid residues as general acid and base catalysts to carry out the isomerization reaction.[2g, 3] In contrast, the type II IDI (IDI-2), discovered in 2001,[4] is a flavoprotein that requires a reduced flavin mononucleotide (FMNred, 3) coenzyme in addition to Mg2+ for activity.[5] The reaction catalyzed by IDI-2 is unusual in that it utilizes the redox active FMN coenzyme to perform a reaction that does not involve a change in the redox state of the substrate/product. This observation raises questions as to the exact role of the flavin coenzyme in the catalytic mechanism. In addition, several human pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus, rely exclusively on IDI-2 for the initiation of long-chain isoprenoid biosynthesis, whereas humans employ the structurally unrelated IDI-1. Thus, IDI-2 is a potential target for new antimicrobial agents.
Several recent studies provide evidence that IDI-2 may employ the reduced FMN coenzyme as an acid/base catalyst to mediate an allylic-1,3-proton addition/elimination reaction at C2 of IPP (1) (Scheme 1). Most notably, X-ray crystallographic studies of the reduced, substrate-bound form of IDI-2 from Sulfolobus shibatae revealed close proximity (2.9 Å) between N5 and the C2 atom of IPP, and the absence of obvious acidic/basic residues in the vicinity of the bound substrate.[6] A substantial accumulation of positive charge on the reduced FMN during turnover as indicated by the kinetic linear free energy relationship (LFER) studies is also consistent with the role of N5 as a putative general acid/base catalyst.[7] The latter observation is likely due to the transfer of the pro-R C2-H of IPP to the N5 atom of the reduced
Scheme 1.
Putative chemical mechanisms for IDI-2 involving the reduced FMN as an acid/base catalyst.
FMN coenzyme (3 → 4 or 5 → 4), which is at least partially rate-limiting in steady state IDI-2 turnover based on substrate deuterium kinetic isotope effect (KIE) studies.[8]
Although the current data support a role for the reduced flavin in the protonation/deprotonation at C2 of IPP/DMAPP during turnover, the identity of the general acid/base catalyst responsible for mediating proton transfer at C4 remains elusive. Early studies by Poulter and co-workers[9] showed that extended incubation in D2O led to selective incorporation of deuterium into the C4 vinyl group of IPP and the (E)-methyl group of DMAPP. The strict C4 regiochemistry of solvent deuterium incorporation by IDI-2 strongly suggests a single IPP binding mode in the active site and the presence of a single acid/base catalyst that carries out C4 proton exchange. As depicted in Scheme 1, three scenarios can be envisioned. Since the N1 atom of the reduced flavin is proximal to the C4 position of IPP/DMAPP (3.9 Å, see Figure 1), it may function as the acid/base catalyst to mediate the proton transfer at C4 (Scheme 1A).[6] This contention is supported by the fact that the pKa of N1 of the reduced FMN is ~6.7 in solution[10] and can be further modulated by a conserved lysine residue that is within hydrogen bonding distance (Lys193 in S. shibatae IDI-2, not shown). In addition, an intermediate accumulates during the pre-steady state of the IDI-2-catalyzed reaction that has a UV-visible absorption spectrum consistent with a neutral reduced flavin[7, 11] However, the N1 proton of FMNH2 (5) is expected to reside within the plane of the isoalloxazine ring and may not be optimally oriented for efficient proton transfer to C4 of the substrate. Thus, considering that the distance between N5 of FMN and C4 of IPP is only 3.6 Å (Figure 1), it is conceivable that N5 is the catalyst for both proton transfers at C2 and C4 of IPP/DMAPP (Scheme 1B).
Figure 1.
Structural model of the S. shibatae IDI-2 active site (PDB entry 2ZRY) complexed with IPP (1).
Alternatively, proton transfer at C4 may be mediated by an amino acid residue as shown in Scheme 1C. A likely candidate is the conserved glutamine residue (Gln154 in S. aureus or Gln160 in S. shibatae IDI-2, Figure 1) which is optimally positioned (at a distance of 3.4–4.5 Å) to mediate proton transfer at the C4 position of IPP/DMAPP.[6] While glutamine is not a typical acid/base catalyst, it may be part of a proton relay consisting of conserved amino acid residues (specifically His11 and Glu229 in S. shibatae, Figure 1). Indeed, site-directed mutagenesis of this glutamine residue led to a mutant enzyme with a substantially lowered kcat value and an unperturbed Km value for IPP.[7] However, these studies do not exclude the possibility that Gln160 simply helps to position the substrate in the proper orientation for flavin-mediated proton transfer to occur. Given that Gln154 and the FMN coenzyme are on opposite faces of the bound substrate molecule (Figure 1), distinct stereochemical outcomes are expected for solvent deuterium incorporation at C4 of IPP for the mechanisms of Schemes 1A, B and 1C. Hence, chiral methyl analysis and proton inventory studies were conducted to probe the stereochemical course of the IDI-2 catalyzed isomerization reaction and examine the involvement of solvent-derived protons in catalysis. Accordingly, we synthesized both (E)- and (Z)-[4-3H]-IPP (12 and 20, Scheme 2) and individually incubated them with IDI-2 in D2O buffer. A chiral methyl analysis assay[12] was then used to determine the configuration of the (E)-4-methyl group of the corresponding DMAPP products.
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of (E)- and (Z)-[4-3H]-IPP (12 and 20) and determination of the stereochemical course of the IDI-2 reaction by chiral methyl analysis, assuming that the solvent deuterium is added to C4 from the si-face of IPP during turnover.
The labeled substrates, (E)- and (Z)-[4-3H]-IPP, were synthesized by a reported procedure with slight modifications.[13] The (E)- and (Z)-4-bromo-3-methyl-3-pentenol intermediates (9 and 10) were obtained in a combined yield of 30% (E:Z ~ 4:1) following separation by silica gel column chromatography. Tritium incorporation was accomplished by the incubation of 9 and 10 with n- and t-BuLi in THF at −78 °C, followed by quenching with [3H]-H2O (20 mCi, 0.2 mL). When D2O was used instead of [3H]-H2O, more than 70% deuterium incorporation was detected by NMR spectroscopy. Subsequent tosylation in dry pyridine afforded the corresponding tosylates in 56% isolated yield ((E)-and (Z)-11: 0.09 μCi/μmol and 0.15 μCi/μmol, respectively). Coupling with pyrophosphate was carried out following a known procedure[14] (51–77% yield, (E)- and (Z)-[4-3H]-IPP (12 and 20): 0.033 μCi/μmol and 0.068 μCi/μmol, respectively).
The labeled substrates 12 and 20 thus obtained were incubated with IDI-2 from S. aureus[11] under anaerobic conditions in the presence of FMN, Mg2+ and sodium dithionite.[15] The reactions were performed under single-turnover conditions (2 mM IDI-2:FMN, 1.8 mM substrate) and were quenched after approximately 1.5 s with HCl/MeOH (3:1). This protocol was necessary to generate sufficient quantity of chiral product for down stream analysis, while preserving the chirality at the (E)-4-methyl group of DMAPP, which would otherwise be lost during an extended incubation due to the facile reversibility of the IDI-2 catalyzed reaction (Keq = 1.4).[16] Following the acid quench, the derivatized DMAPP products[17] were extracted with petroleum ether and, after solvent evaporation, the isolated products were subjected to Kuhn-Roth oxidation.[18] The nascent acetic acid samples (formed in radiochemical yields of 33–44%) were converted to their respective CoA thioesters (14 and 21) and their chiralities were determined using the malate synthase/fumarase chiral methyl assay.[12] Authentic (S)- and (R)-[2-2H,3H]-acetate standards were also prepared[19] and analyzed using the same chiral methyl assay for comparison with the IDI-2-derived acetate samples.
The results of the chiral methyl analysis for the authentic acetate standards and for the acetate samples derived from 12 and 20 after incubation with IDI-2 are listed in Table 1. F values of 74 and 25 were determined for the authentic (R)- and (S)-acetate standards, respectively, which are near the values expected for enantiomerically pure samples (F = 79 and 21, respectively).[12] Likewise, F values of 67 and 32 (corresponding to 59% and 62% ee of the (R) and (S) configurations) were obtained for acetate derived from (E)- and (Z)-[4-3H]-labeled IPP (12 and 20), respectively.
Table 1.
Chiral methyl analysis of the IDI-2-catalyzed reaction.
| Substrate/Standard | F Value[a] | % ee[b] | Stereochemistry |
|---|---|---|---|
| (R)-acetate | 74 | 83 | (R) |
| (S)-acetate | 25 | 86 | (S) |
| 12 | 67 ± 3 | 59 ± 10 | (R) |
| 20 | 32 ± 7 | 24 ± 24 | (S) |
F value = percentage of tritium retention in the fumarase reaction.
% ee = [(|F-50|)/29]×100
Although the ee values of the acetate samples derived from 12 and 20 are modest, these data clearly indicate that (E)- and (Z)-[4-3H]-IPP are deuterated in the active site to yield DMAPP with chiral (E)-4-methyl groups of the (R) and (S) configuration, respectively. On the basis of current structural models of the IDI-active site in complex with FMN, IPP, and Mg2+ (Figure 1), these stereochemical data are inconsistent with a mechanism of IDI-catalysis involving substrate protonation by an active site acid (Scheme 1C). Instead, the data indicate that the proton is added to the double bond of IPP from the side of the molecule facing the reduced FMN coenzyme, thus supporting a role for N1 or N5 of flavin in the protonation of IPP at C4 (Scheme 1A, B and 3A, B) The F values determined for the DMAPP-derived acetate samples, which differ from those determined for the chiral acetate standards, likely indicate that the reverse reaction has occurred to a significant extent prior to the acid quench of the IDI-2 reaction. This would reduce the fraction of chiral acetate in the samples via exchange of the C4 proton of IPP/DMAPP with solvent deuterium, thereby perturbing the experimentally determined F values toward 50.
Scheme 3.
The stereochemical course of the IDI-2 catalyzed reactions with 12 and 20 in D2O, illustrated with mechanisms in which A) N1 and N5 of reduced FMN, B) N5 alone mediate acid/base chemistry at C4 and C2 of IPP.
To gain additional insight into the mechanism of solvent proton incorporation by IDI-2, solvent kinetic isotope effect (SKIE) and proton inventory studies of the IDI-2-catalyzed reaction were performed.[20] At pL 8.0, the SKIEs on the IDI-2-catalyzed reaction are D2Okcat/Km = 3.8 and D2Okcat = 1.4, suggesting that bonds to solvent exchangeable proton(s) are likely breaking in the rate-limiting transition state(s) (Figure S2). Control experiments demonstrate that the apparent SKIEs are not due to an increase in solution viscosity caused by the substitution of H2O with D2O (Figure S4). The proton inventory curve of the IDI-2-catalyzed reaction under saturating IPP concentrations is shown in Figure S3 along with fits to various forms of the Gross-Butler equation.[21] The curve is dome-shaped and most readily explained by a model involving the transfer of a single solvent-exchangeable proton with a fractionation factor φ = 0.3 in the transition state of a step that is only partially rate-limiting (cvf + cr = 2.4, where cvf and cr are forward and reverse commitments to catalysis). A fractionation factor of 0.3 corresponds to a normal SKIE of 3.3 and is consistent with bond cleavage to a solvent exchangeable proton and perhaps reflects the transfer of a proton to the IPP double bond (5 → 4 or 4 → 3, Scheme 1A, B).
In summary, chiral methyl analysis of the DMAPP products derived from the IDI-2 catalyzed reaction with (E)- and (Z)-[4-3H]-IPP (12 and 20) in D2O provides strong support for a chemical mechanism involving a flavin-mediated protonation at the vinyl C4 position of the bound IPP substrate. In addition, SKIE and proton inventory studies suggest that this proton transfer may be partially rate-limiting to steady state IDI-2 turnover. When taken into consideration with the body of mechanistic and structural studies of IDI-2,[6–8, 11, 22] these results are most consistent with a mechanism involving reduced flavin-mediated acid/base chemistry at both C2 and C4 of IPP/DMAPP (Scheme 1A, B). The relative feasibility of the two pathways in Scheme 1A, B depends largely on the identity of the reduced flavin species that accumulates in the pre-steady state of the IDI-2-catalyzed reaction. A comparison of the UV-visible absorption spectrum of IPP-bound IDI-2 with other reduced flavoenzymes[7, 11] suggests that 1,5-dihydro-FMNH2 (5) accumulates upon IPP binding, which would favor the mechanism shown in Scheme 1A. In this scenario, the protonation at C4 of IPP mediated by N1 of the reduced FMN (perhaps assisted by Lys186, Lys193 in S. shibatae) and the deprotonation at C2 by N5 may occur in either a stepwise or concerted fashion. However, as noted above, the N1 proton of 5 may not be in an optimal position for transfer to the double bond of IPP. Thus, the mechanism in Scheme 1B is currently favored, in which N5 catalyzes the sequential protonation (at C4) and deprotonation (at C2) of IPP. Clearly, the results presented herein have unambiguously established an unusual function of flavin coenzymes in biocatalysis. Interestingly, a similar role for reduced flavin has also been implicated in the mechanisms of several newly characterized enzymes.[23]
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Professor Dale Poulter for sharing with us unpublished structural information that illuminates the possible role of FMN in IDI-2 catalysis, and Professors Sandro Ghisla and Hisashi Hemmi for their helpful discussion. This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM040541) and the Welch Foundation (F-1511).
Footnotes
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.chembiochem.org or from the author.
References
- 1.Thulasiram HV, Erickson HK, Poulter CD. Science. 2007;316:73–76. doi: 10.1126/science.1137786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.a) Agranoff BW, Eggerer H, Henning U, Lynen F. J Am Chem Soc. 1959;81:1254–1255. [Google Scholar]; b) Agranoff BW, Eggerer H, Henning U, Lynen F. J Biol Chem. 1960;235:326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Lynen F, Agranoff BW, Eggerer H, Henning U, Moslein EM. Angew Chem. 1959;71:657. [Google Scholar]; d) Cornforth JW, Popjak G. Methods Enzymol. 1969;15:359. [Google Scholar]; e) Ramos-Valdivia AC, van der Heijden R, Verpoorte R. Nat Prod Rep. 1997;14:591. doi: 10.1039/np9971400591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Cornforth JW, Cornforth RH, Popjak G, Gore IY. Biochem J. 1958;69:146. doi: 10.1042/bj0690146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Lee S, Poulter CD. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:11545. doi: 10.1021/ja063073c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.a) Reardon JE, Abeles RH. Biochemistry. 1986;25:5609. doi: 10.1021/bi00367a040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Muehlbacher M, Poulter C. Biochemistry. 1988;27:7315–7328. doi: 10.1021/bi00419a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Wouters J, Oudjama Y, Barkley SJ, Tricot C, Stalon V, Droogmans L, Poulter CD. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:11903. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212823200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kaneda K, Kuzuyama T, Takagi M, Hayakawa Y, Seto H. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.020472198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.a) Hemmi H, Ikeda Y, Yamashita S, Nakayama T, Nishino T. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;322:905. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) de Ruyck J, Rothman SC, Poulter CD, Wouters J. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;338:1515. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.10.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Rothman SC, Helm TR, Poulter CD. Biochemistry. 2007;46:5437. doi: 10.1021/bi0616347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Unno H, Yamashita S, Ikeda Y, Sekiguchi S-y, Yoshida N, Yoshimura T, Kusunoki M, Nakayama T, Nishino T, Hemmi H. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:9160–9167. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808438200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thibodeaux C, Chang W-C, Liu H-w. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:9994–9996. doi: 10.1021/ja104090m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Thibodeaux CJ, Mansoorabadi SO, Kittleman W, Chang W-C, Liu H-w. Biochemistry. 2008;47:2547–2558. doi: 10.1021/bi701467g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barkley S, Desai S, Poulter C. Org Lett. 2004;6:5019–5021. doi: 10.1021/ol0477273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.a) Walsh C. Acc Chem Res. 1980 [Google Scholar]; b) Walsh C, Fisher J, Spencer R, Graham DW, Ashton WT, Brown JE, Brown RD, Rogers EF. Biochemistry. 1978;17:1942–1951. doi: 10.1021/bi00603a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Mansoorabadi SO, Thibodeaux CJ, Liu H-w. J Org Chem. 2007;72:6329–6342. doi: 10.1021/jo0703092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Begley dTP. Acc Chem Res. 1994;27:394–401. [Google Scholar]; e) Fitzpatrick PF. Acc Chem Res. 2001;34:299–307. doi: 10.1021/ar0000511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Fujimori D, Walsh C. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2007;11:553–560. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kittleman W, Thibodeaux CJ, Liu Y-n, Zhang H, Liu H-w. Biochemistry. 2007;46:8401–8413. doi: 10.1021/bi700286a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.a) Cornforth J, Redmond J, Eggerer H, Buckel W, Gutschow C. Nature. 1969;221:1212–1213. doi: 10.1038/2211212a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Cornforth JW, Redmond JW, Eggerer H, Buckel W, Gutschow C. Eur J Biochem. 1970;14:1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1970.tb00254.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Floss H, Lee S. Acc Chem Res. 1993;26:116–122. [Google Scholar]
- 13.a) Ito M, Kobayashi M, Koyama T, Ogura K. Biochemistry. 1987;26:4745–4750. doi: 10.1021/bi00389a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Cane D, Weiner S. Can J Chem. 1994;72:118–127. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Davisson V, Woodside A, Neal T, Stremler K, Muehlbacher M, Poulter C. J Org Chem. 1986;51:4768–4779. [Google Scholar]
- 15.See supporting information for experimental details.
- 16.Thibodeaux CJ. University of Texas at Austin; Austin: 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Poulter CD, Satterwhite DM. Biochemistry. 1977;16:5470–5478. doi: 10.1021/bi00644a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Maciak G. In: Whistler R, Wolfrom M, editors. Vol. 1. Academic Press; New York: 1962. p. 461. [Google Scholar]
- 19.The standard (S)-[2-2H,3H]acetate was synthesized chemically from pro-S tritium-labeled glycine (Kajiwara, M., Lee, S.-F., Scott, A. I., Akhtar, M., Jones, C. R., Jordan, P. M. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1978, 967), which was generated by the incubation of [2-3H]glycine with alanine aminotransferase (Besmer, P. Ph.D. Dissertation No. 4435, ETH, Zürich, 1970). An identical sequence using deuterated buffer afforded the (R)-[2-2H,3H]acetate.
- 20.It should be noted that the activity of IDI-2 reconstituted with reduced 1-deaza-FMN is comparable to that of wild type enzyme.[14] Since the C1 pKa of 1-deaza-FMN is ~ 5.8,[1] this coenzyme is protonated predominantly at O2 and O4 to form FMNH2 in free solution. However, the C1 anion may be a more important resonance contributor in the IDI-2 active site given the presence of Lys186 which is ~ 3 Å away.
- 21.Schowen KB, Schowen RL. Methods Enzymol. 1982;87:551–606. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.a) Rothman SC, Johnston JB, Lee S, Walker JR, Poulter CD. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:4906–4913. doi: 10.1021/ja7108954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Sharma N, Pan JJ, Poulter C. Biochemistry. 2010;49:6288–6233. doi: 10.1021/bi100844e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Kao C, Kittleman W, Zhang H, Seto H, Liu H. Org Lett. 2005;7:5677–5680. doi: 10.1021/ol0524050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yu QJ, Schaub P, Ghisla S, Al-Babili S, Krieger-Liszkay A, Beyer P. Biol Chem J. 2010;285:12109–12120. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.091843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Yu QJ, Ghisla S, Hirschberg J, Mann V, Beyer P. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:8666–8676. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.208017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




