Skip to main content
PMC home page
European Spine Journal logoLink to European Spine Journal
. 1997 Mar;6(2):138–143. doi: 10.1007/BF01358747

Anterior cervical allograft arthrodesis and instrumentation: Multilevel interbody grafting or strut graft reconstruction

M L Swank 1, G L Lowery 1,✉, A L Bhat 1, R F McDonough 1
PMCID: PMC3454584  PMID: 9209883

Abstract

This retrospective study evaluated a single surgeon's series of patients treated by multilevel cervical disc excision (two or three levels), allograft tricortical iliac crest arthrodesis, and anterior instrumentation. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare fusion success and clinical outcome between multilevel Smith-Robinson interbody grafting and tricortical iliac strut graft reconstruction, both supplemented with anterior instrumentation in the cervical spine. The incidence of nonunion for cervical discectomy and fusion varies widely depending on the number of disc levels involved, type of bone graft used, and whether the anterior grafting is supplemented with instrumentation. An alternative to multilevel interbody fusion is corpectomy and strut grafting, in which the incidence of nonunion has been reported to be 27% with autograft and 41% with allograft. Sixty-four consecutive patients who underwent allograft tricortical iliac crest reconstruction and anterior cervical plating were studied. The average follow-up was 39 months. There were 38 patients in the discectomy and interbody grafting group and 26 patients in the corpectomy and strut graft reconstruction group. Pseudoarthrosis occurred in 42% of the anterior cervical interbody fusion patients and 31% of the corpectomy patients. Nonunion in two-level interbody fusions occurred in 36% of the patients as compared to 10% for patients with one-level corpectomies; while 54% of patients with three-level interbody fusions and 44% of patients with two-level corpectomies were noted to have pseudoarthrosis. Higher percentages of nonunion were noted in multilevel interbody grafting than in corpectomy with strut grafting and when more vertebral levels were involved. These radiographic and clinical findings underscore the shortcomings of multilevel anterior cervical allograft reconstruction with plating. Corpectomy may be the preferred method when multiple disc levels are fused. In addition, anterior corpectomy affords decompression of significant osteophytes in a safer and quicker manner. In retrospective studies, there is a need for long-term follow-up before accurate statements can be made about the study population.

Key words: Allograft fusions, Multilevel anterior cervical interbody fusion, Strut graft Anterior cervical plating

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

References

  • 1.Aebi M, Mohler J, Zäch GA, Morscher E. Indication, surgical technique, and results of 100 surgicallytreated fractures and fracture-dislocation of the cervical spine. Clin Orthop. 1986;203:244–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aebi M, Zuber K, Marchesi D. Treatment of cervical spine injuries with anterior plating. Indications, techniques, and results. Spine. 1991;16:S38–S45. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199103001-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Böhler J, Gaudernak T. Anterior plate stabilization for fracture-dislocations of the lower cervical spine. J Trauma. 1980;20:203–205. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198003000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bremer AM, Nguyen TQ. Internal metal plate fixation combined with anterior interbody fusion in cases of cervical spine injury. Neurosurgery. 1983;12:649–652. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198306000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brodke DS, Zdeblick TA. Modified Smith-Robinson procedure for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine. 1992;17:S427–5430. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199210001-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brown MD, Malinin TI, Davis PB. A roentgenographic evaluation of frozen allografts versus autografts in anterior cervical spine fusions. Clin Orthop. 1976;119:231–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Caspar W, Barbier DB, Klara PM. Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma. Neurosurgery. 1989;25:491–502. doi: 10.1097/00006123-198910000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg. 1958;15:602–617. doi: 10.3171/jns.1958.15.6.0602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.DePalma AF, Rothman RH, Lewinnek GE, Canale ST. Anterior interbody fusion for severe cervical disc degeneration. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1972;134:755–758. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fernyhough JC, White JI, LaRocca H. Fusion rates in multilevel cervical spondylosis comparing allograft fibula with autograft fibula in 126 patients. Spine. 1991;16:5561–8564. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199110001-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gore DR, Sepic SB. Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded discs. Spine. 1984;9:667–671. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198410000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hanai K, Fujiyoshi F, Kamei K. Subtotal vertebrectomy and spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine. 1986;11:310–315. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198605000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hubach PCG. A prospective study of cervical spondylodesis in intervertebral disc disorders. Eur Spine J. 1994;3:209–213. doi: 10.1007/BF02221594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Johnston FG, Crockard HA. One-stage internal fixation and anterior fusion in complex cervical spinal disorders. J Neurosurg. 1995;82:234–238. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.82.2.0234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kostuik JP, Connolly PJ, Esses SI, Sun P. Anterior cervical plate fixation with the titanium hollow screw plate system. Spine. 1993;18:1273–1278. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199308000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lindsey RW, Newhouse KE, Leach J, Murphy MJ. Nonunion following two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Clin Orthop. 1987;223:155–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Müller EJ, Aebi M. Anterior fusion of the cervical spine. Spine State Art Rev. 1992;6:459–474. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Okada K, Shirasaki N, Hayashi H, Oka S, Hosoya T. Treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by enlargement of the spinal canal anteriorly, followed by arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1991;73:352–363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Scuderi GJ, Bengt L, Garfin SR. Complications in anterior corpectomy and strut fusion. Oper Tech Orthop. 1993;3:251–256. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Simmons EH, Bhalla SK. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a clinical and biomechanical study with eight-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1969;51:225–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tippets RH, Apfelbaum RI. Anterior cervical fusion with the Caspar instrumentation system. Neurosurgery. 1988;22:1008–1013. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198806010-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Whitecloud TS, LaRocca H. Fibular strut graft in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine. Spine. 1976;1:33–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yonenobu K, Fuji T, Ono K, Okada K, Yamamoto T, Harada N. Choice of surgical treatment for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine. 1985;10:710–716. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198510000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Young WF, Rosenwasser RH. An early comparative analysis of the use of fibular allograft versus autologous iliac crest graft for interbody fusion after anterior cervical discectomy. Spine. 1993;18:1123–1124. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199307000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zdeblick TA, Ducker TB. The use of freeze-dried allograft bone for anterior cervical fusions. Spine. 1991;16:726–729. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199107000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from European Spine Journal are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES