Abstract
The concave and convex rib-vertebral angle (RVA) at levels T2–T12 was measured on AP radiographs of 19 patients with right convex idiopathic thoracic scoliosis and 10 patients with major thoracic right convex neuromuscular scoliosis. The difference between the angles on the concave and the convex sides, the RVAD, was calculated. The RVAs were also measured on radiographs from three animal groups in which spinal curves had been induced experimentally in a variety of ways. Group 1 comprised 16 rabbits that had been subjected to selective electrostimulation of the latissimus dorsi, the erector spinae and the intercostal muscles. Group 2 comprised four dead rabbits whose spines had been subjected to manual bending. Group 3 comprised eight rabbits that had undergone mechanical elongation of one rib. In both the idiopathic and the neuromuscular group, the convex RVA was smaller than the concave RVA between levels T2 and T8, with a maximal difference between T4 to T5. From T9 to T12 the concave RVA was smaller than the convex. The RVA in relation to the scoliotic segment, i.e. the apex level of the curve and the two neighbouring vertebrae above and below this level, showed similar results. With increasing Cobb angle the RVADs increased linearly with the greatest difference at the second vertebra above the apex. In the three experimental groups the pattern of the RVADs between T6 to T12 was basically similar to the findings of the clinical study. From the results of these clinical and experimental studies, it is concluded that the typical pattern of the RVAs on the concave and convex sides seems to be independent of the underlying cause of the spinal curvature. It is likely that the RVADs result from a passive mechanical adaptation of the ribs to the lateral curvature of the spine.
Key words: Rib-vertebral angle difference, Idiopathic scoliosis, Neuromuscular scoliosis, Experimental scoliosis
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (509.0 KB).
References
- 1.Aaro S. Computer tomography in studies of scoliotic deformity. Stockholm: Karolinska Institute; 1980. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aaro S, Dahlborn M, Svensson L (1982) Estimation of vertebral rotation and the spinal rib cage deformity in scoliosis by computer tomography. Spine 6460–6467 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.Burwell RG, Cole AA, Cook TA, et al. Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. The Nottingham Concept. Acta Orthop Belg. 1992;58:33–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bylund P. Muscle physiologic studies of the erector spinae in idiopathic scoliosis (in Swedish) Stockholm: Karolinska Institute; 1985. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ceballos T, Ferrer-Torrelles M, Castillo F, Fernandez-Paredes E. Prognosis in infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1980;62:863–875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Colonna PC, Vom Saal F. A study of paralytic scoliosis based on five hundred cases of poliomyelitis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1941;23:335–353. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Duval-Beaupère G. Pathogenic relationship between scoliosis and growth. In: Zorab PA, editor. Scoliosis and growth. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1971. pp. 58–64. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ferreira JH, James JIP. Progressive and resolving infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Differential diagnosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1972;54:648–655. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fidler MW, Jowett RL. Muscle imbalance in the aetiology of scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1976;58:200–201. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.58B2.932082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gregori M, Pecak F, Trontelj JV, Dimitrijevic MR. Postural control in scoliosis. A statokinesimetric study in patients with scoliosis due to neuromuscular disorders and in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:59–63. doi: 10.3109/17453678108991759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grivas TB, Burwell RG, Purdue M, Webb JK, Moulton A. Segmental pattern of rib vertebra angles in chest radiographs of children: changes related to rib level, age, sex, side and significance for scoliosis. Clin Anat. 1991;5:272–288. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Grivas TB, Burwell RG, Purdue M, Webb JK, Moulton A. The rib cage deformity in infantile orthopaedic scoliosis. The funnel shaped upper chest in relation to specific rotation as a prognostic factor. In: Alberti A, Drerup B, Hierholzer E, editors. Surface topography and spinal deformity. Stuttgart New York: Gustav; 1992. pp. 93–109. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Herman R, Mixon J, Fisher A, Smyck J. Idiopathic scoliosis and the central nervous system: a motor control problem. Spine. 1985;10:1–14. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198501000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Horn CV. Electromyographic investigation of muscle imbalance in patients with paralytic scoliosis. Electromyography. 1969;4:447–456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.James JIP. Idiopathic scoliosis: the prognosis, diagnosis and operative indications related to curve patterns and the age at onset. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1954;36:36–49. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.36B1.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kristmundsdottir F, Burwell RG, James IP. The rib-verteba angles on the convexity and concavity of the spinal curve in infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop. 1985;201:205–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mannherz RE, Betz RR, Clancy M, Steel HH. Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis followed to skeletal maturity. Spine. 1988;13:1087–1090. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198810000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mehta M. The rib-vertebra angle in the early diagnosis between resolving and progressive scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1972;54:230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Moe JH, Winter RB, Bradford DS, Lonstein JE. Scoliosis and other spinal deformities. Philadelphia London Toronto: Saunders; 1978. pp. 7–8. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Reuber M, Schultz T, McNiell T, Spencer D. Trunk muscle myeloelectric activities in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1983;8:447–456. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198307000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Riddle HFV, Roaf R (1955) Muscle imbalance in the causation of scoliosis: Lancet June: 1245–1247 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 22.Sahgal V, Shah A, Flanagan N, et al. Morphologic and morphometric studies of muscle in idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983;54:242–251. doi: 10.3109/17453678308996564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sevastik B, Willers U, Hedlund R, Sevastik JA, Kristjansson S. Scoliosis induced immediately after mechanical rib elongation in the rabbit. Spine. 1993;7:923–926. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199306000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Thulbourne T, Gillespie R. The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1976;58:64–71. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.58B1.1270497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Willers U, Sevastik B, Hedlund R, Sevastik JA, Kristjansson S. Three- dimensional effects of electric stimulation of the spine of the rabbit. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;66:411–414. doi: 10.3109/17453679508995576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wojcik AS, Webb JK, Burwell RG. An analysis of the effect of the Zielke operation on the rib-cage of S-shaped curves in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1990;15:81–86. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199002000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wythers DJ, Burwell RG, Webb JK, Woijcik AS (1990) A segmental analysis of rib vertebra angles in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: muscle tether and release. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the British Scoliosis Society, Southampton, pp 22–24
- 28.Xiong B. Morphometric studies of the vertebral changes in idiopathic scoliosis. A radiographic and computer tomographic investigation. Stockholm: Karolinska Institute; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xiong B, Sevastik JA, Hedlund R, Sevastik B. Radiographic changes at the coronal plane in early scoliosis. Spine. 1994;19:159–164. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199401001-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yarom R, Robin GC. Studies on spinal and peripheral muscles from patients with scoliosis. Spine. 1979;4:12–21. doi: 10.1097/00007632-197901000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zetterberg C, Aniansson A, Grimby G. Morphology of the paravertebral muscles in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1983;8:457–462. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198307000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zetterberg C, Björk R, Örtengren R, Andersson GBJ. Electromyography of the paravertebral muscles in idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984;55:304–309. doi: 10.3109/17453678408992362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zuk T. The role of spinal and abdominal muscles in the pathogenesis of scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1962;44:102–105. [Google Scholar]
