Abstract
The course and outcome of 142 pregnancies in 146 patients operated between 1970 and 1975 by the Harrington method for idiopathic scoliosis were studied to determine the effects of scoliosis on pregnancy and childbirth and the effects of pregnancy on the remaining fused and unfused scoliotic curvatures. Occurrence of and sick leave due to low back pain during pregnancy was determined. The patients, all originally treated at the Orthopedic Hospital of the Invalid Foundation (Orton) in Helsinki, Finland, were invited to a clinical and radiological re-examination on average 19 years following surgery. The results show that pregnancy does not significantly increase fused scoliotic curvatures nor the remaining unfused curvatures. A somewhat higher proportion of children (23%) were delivered by cesarean section than in the general population (15%;P < 0.01), but this result should only be taken as suggestive. Rates of complications of pregnancy and in labor did not differ from those in the background population. The offspring were healthy. Low back pain during pregnancy occurred in about 40% of our patients, but was severe enough to cause sick leave only in 11 % of the pregnancies.
Key words: Idiopathic scoliosis, Surgery, Pregnancy, Low back pain
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (332.6 KB).
References
- 1.Berman AT, Cohen DL, Schwentker EP. The effects of pregnancy on idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1982;7:76–77. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198200710-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Betz RR, Bunnell WP, Lambrecht-Mulier E, MacEwen GD. Scoliosis and pregnancy. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1987;69:90–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Blount WP, Mellencamp DD. The effect of pregnancy on idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1980;62:1083–1088. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cochran T, Irstam L, Nachemsson A. Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion. Spine. 1983;8:576–584. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198309000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dugan RJ, Black ME. Kyphoscoliosis and pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1957;73:89–93. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)37270-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Finnish National Malformation Register 1963–1991. Finnish National Board of Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland
- 7.Finnish National Board of Welfare and Health (1990–1993) Finnish Nationwide Perinatal Statistics 1987–1990 (four vols in Finnish). Finnish State Printing Center, Helsinki, Finland
- 8.Harrington PR. Surgical instrumentation for management of scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1960;42:1448. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kopenhager T. A review of 50 pregnant patients with kyphoscoliosis. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1977;84:585–587. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1977.tb12658.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Manning CW. Pregnancy and scoliosis. Lancet. 1967;14:792–795. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)92232-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Myllynen L. Work during pregnancy. Helsinki: University Press; 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Siegler D, Zorab PA. Pregnancy in thoracic scoliosis. Br J Dis Chest. 1981;75:367–370. doi: 10.1016/0007-0971(81)90024-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Visscher W, Lonstein JE, Hoffman DA, Mandel JS, Harris BSH., III Reproductive outcomes in scoliosis patients. Spine. 1988;13:1096–1098. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198810000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]