Skip to main content
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 1997 Mar;14(3):145–147. doi: 10.1007/BF02766130

Anesthesia practices in the united states common to in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers

Edward C Ditkoff 1,, Jennifer Plumb 1, Amy Selick 1, Mark V Sauer 1
PMCID: PMC3454676  PMID: 9090556

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to characterize and describe anesthesia practice in programs performing IVF in the United States.

Methods: We used a telephone survey requiring respondents to be either the program director, a physician, or a nurse familiar with the practice. Two hundred seven (78%) Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) registered programs agreed to participate. Programs were divided by geographic region and type of practice (academic versus private).

Results: Ninety-one private (68%) and 41 academic (56%) programs used personnel provided by the Department of Anesthesiology. Conscious sedation was performed most commonly (95%). The remaining 5% used primarily either general, regional, or local anesthesia. Typical recovery times were 90 to 120 min. Average costs of anesthetic administration were $300–$400 and were similar among groups except for the Eastern academic programs, with a higher mean cost of $543. Programs using personnel from anesthesiology reported higher costs compared to programs utilizing their own staff ($391±15 vs $157±11; P<0.05). Complications were infrequent (<10%); no hospitalizations or serious life-threatening incidents were reported.

Conclusions: A large number of programs safely used their own trained personnel to deliver anesthesia, and realized a significant reduction in cost.

Key words: anesthesia, in vitro fertilization, conscious sedation, Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (288.7 KB).

References

  • 1.Hayes MF, Sacco MF, Savoy-Moore RT, Magyar DM, Endler GC, Moghissi KS. Effect of general anesthesia on fertilization and cleavage of human oocytes in vitro. Fertil Steril. 1987;48(6):975–981. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59594-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Manica VS, Bader AM, Fragneto R, Gilbertson L, Datta S. Anesthesia for in vitro fertilization: A comparison of 1.5% and 5% spinal lidocaine for ultrasonically guided oocyte retrieval. Anesth Analg. 1993;77:453–456. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199309000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Corson SL, Batzer FR, Gocial B, Kelly M, Gutmann JN, Go K, English M. Is paracervical block anesthesia for oocyte retrieval effective? Fertil Steril. 1994;62(1):133–136. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56828-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Swanson RJ, Leavitt MG. Fertilization and mouse embryo development in the presence of midazolam. Anesth Analg. 1992;75:549–554. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199210000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rosen MA, Roizen MF, Eger EI, Glass RH, Martin M, Dandekar PV, Dailey PA, Litt L. The effect of nitrous oxide on in vitro fertilization success rate. Anesthesiology. 1987;67:42–44. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198707000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pierce ET, Smalky M, Alper MM, Hunter JA, Amrhein RL, Pierce EC. Comparison of pregnancy rates following gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) under general anesthesia with thiopental sodium or propofol. J Clin Anesth. 1992;4:394–398. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(92)90164-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Silva PD, Meisch AL, Meisch JK, Kang SB, Rooney B. Factors associated with improving success rates with gamete intrafallopian transfer under thin-needle spinal anesthesia. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12(9):569–573. doi: 10.1007/BF02212576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vincent RD, Syrop CH, Voorhis BJ, Chestnut DH, Amy E, Sparks T, McGrath JM, Choi WW, Bates JN, Penning DH. An evaluation of the effect of anesthetic technique on reproductive success after laparoscopic pronuclear stage transfer. Anesthesiology. 1995;82:352–358. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199502000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Matt DW, Steingold KA, Dastvan CM, James CA, Dunwiddie W. Effects of sera from patients given various anesthetics on preimplantation mouse embryo development in vitro. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer. 1991;8(4):191–197. doi: 10.1007/BF01130803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Koblin DD, Watson JE, Deady JE, Stokstad ELR, Eger EI. Inactivation of methionine synthetase by nitrous oxide in mice. Anesthesiology. 1981;54:318–324. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198104000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Boyers SP, Lavy G, Russell J, DeCherney AH. A paired analysis of in vitro fertilization and cleavage rates of first-versus last-recovered preovulatory human oocytes exposed to varying intervals of 100% CO2 pneumoperitoneum and general anesthesia. 1987;48(6):969–974. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59593-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gonen O, Shulman A, Ghetler Y, Shapiro A, Judeiken R, Beyth Y, Ben-Nun I. The impact of different types of anesthesia on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer treatment outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12(10):678–682. doi: 10.1007/BF02212892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yuzpe AA, Brown SE, Casper RF, Nisker J, Graves G, Shatford L. Transvaginal, ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Med. 1989;34(12):937–942. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schulman JD, Dorfman AD, Jones SL, Pitt CC, Joyce B, Patton LA. Outpatient in vitro fertilization using transvaginal ultrasound guided oocyte retrieval. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69(4):665–668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES