Abstract
Introduction:Multiple pregnancy is one of the most important and preventable complications of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer. The general clinical practice in many IVF clinics is to transfer four or five embryos to older women if available, since pregnancy rates are lower in women older than 35 years of age. However, it is not clear whether the risk for multiple pregnancy is also lower.
Objective:Our objective was to investigate whether transferring a higher number of embryos actually improves pregnancy outcome in older women, without increasing the risk for multiple pregnancy and to investigate other factors that may affect the occurrence of multiple pregnancy.
Setting:The setting was university-based IVF program at The Toronto Hospital.
Design:The design was a retrospective case series.
Patients and Methods:The outcome of 1116 IVF cycles between January 1992 and December 1993 was investigated according to different age groups.
Main Outcome Measure:The main outcome measure was multiple pregnancies.
Results:Seventy multiple pregnancies resulted from a total of 242 pregnancies. Overall pregnancy and multiple pregnancy rates were inversely correlated with age. However, when the data were adjusted for the number of embryos transferred, this trend disappeared. The result of multiple regression analysis showed that the multiple pregnancy rate was higher without improving the pregnancy rate when the number of embryos transferred exceeded three, regardless of the age of the patients, especially when more embryos were available than the number of transferred ones.
Conclusions:The number of embryos transferred should be limited to a maximum of three regardless of the age of patients, to reduce the high frequency of multiple gestations in an IVF program.
Key Words: in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer, pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, age, endometrial thickness
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (655.0 KB).
References
- 1.Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;2:336–336. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92957-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gemzell G, Ross P. Pregnancies following treatment with human gonadotropins with special reference to the problem of multiple births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966;94:940–945. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(66)90049-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schenker JG, Yarkoui S, Granat M. Multiple pregnancies following induction of ovulation. Fertil Steril. 1981;35:105–123. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45308-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Medical Research International Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Fertility Society In vitro fertilization embryo transfer (IVFET) in the United States: 1989 results from the IVF-ET Registry. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:14–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Seoud MA, Toner JP, Kruithoff C, Muasher SJ. Outcome of twin, triplet, and quadruplet in vitro fertilization pregnancies: The Norfolk experience. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:825–834. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wood C, McMaster R, Rennie G, Trounson A, Leeton J. Factors influencing pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1985;43:245–245. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48380-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Corson SL, Dickey RP, Gocial B, Batzer FR, Eisenberg E, Huppert L, Maislin G. Outcome in 242 in vitro fertilization-embryo replacement or gamete intrafallopian transfer-induced pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:644–650. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60614-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yovich JL. Embryo quality and pregnancy rates in vitro fertilization. Lancet. 1985;1:283–284. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)91061-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Navot D, Bergh PA, Laufer N. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: Prevention and treatment. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:249–261. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55188-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gonen Y, Casper RF. Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer. 1990;7:146–152. doi: 10.1007/BF01135678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Salat-Baroux J, Aknin J, Antoine J, Alamowitch R. The management of multiple pregnancies after induction for superovulation. Hum Reprod. 1988;3:399–401. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Medical Research International, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART), the American Fertility Society In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in the United States. 1990 Results from the IVF-ET registry. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:15–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dommergues M, Nisand I, Mandelbrot L, Isfer E, Radunovic N, Dumez Y. Embryo reduction in multifetal pregnancies after infertility therapy: obstetrical risks and perinatal benefits are related to operative strategy. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:805–810. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54252-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Salat-Baroux J, Aknin J, Antoine JM, Alvarez S, Cornet D, Plachot M, Mandelbaum J. Is there an indication for embryo reduction? Hum Reprod. 1992;7:67–72. doi: 10.1093/humrep/7.suppl_1.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rutherford AJ, Dawson KJ, Subak-Sharpe RJ, Winston N, Margara RA, Winston RML: Can the risk of higher multiple pregnancy (triplets or greater) after IVF be eliminated. Presented at the 6th World Congress of IVF and Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Jerusalem, 1989
- 16.Khazen N, Puissant F, Camus M, Lejeune B, Leroy F. A comparison between multiple and single pregnancies obtained by in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1986;1:251–254. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hershlag A, Floch JA, DeCherney AH, Lavy G. Comparison of singleton and multiple pregnancies in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET) J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer. 1990;7:157–158. doi: 10.1007/BF01135680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nijs M, Geerts L, Roosendaal E, Segal-Bertin G, Vanderz-walmen P, Schoysman R. Prevention of multiple pregnancies in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:1245–1250. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55984-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Leroy F, Puissant F, Barlow P, Maertelaer G. Guidelines for the prevention of multiple pregnancy in treatment by in vitro fertilization. Acta Genet Gemellol. 1990;39:371–378. doi: 10.1017/s0001566000005298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dubuisson JB, Foulot H, Ranoux C, Rambaud D, Aubriot FX: La fécondation in vitro en cycle spontané.In Stérilité Féminine et Procréations Médicalement Assistées; B Hedon, R Frydmon, M Plachot, (eds). Paris; Doin, 19xx, pp 49–53
- 21.Henry L. Some data on natural fertility. Eugen Q. 1961;8:81–81. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1961.9987465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sharma V, Riddle A, Mason BA, Pampiglione J, Campbell S. An analysis of factors influencing the establishment of a clinical pregnancy in an ultrasound-based ambulatory in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:468–478. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59775-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zenses MT, Wang P, Casper RF. Evidence for maternal predisposition to chromosome aneuploidy in multiple oocytes of some in vitro fertilization patients. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:143–149. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54791-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tedeschi B, Vernole P, Sanna ML, Nicoletti B. Population cytogenetics of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites. Hum Genetics. 1992;89:543–547. doi: 10.1007/BF00219181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Smith M de A, Bortolotto MH, Melaragno MI, Toniolo Neto J. Investigation of the effect of hydrogen peroxide on the chromosomes of young and elderly individuals. Mech Age Dev. 1990;56:107–115. doi: 10.1016/0047-6374(90)90002-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]