Abstract
Purpose: This multicenter study was carried out to compare the efficacy of intrauterine insemination (IUI) and intraperitoneal insemination (IPI) associated with multiple follicular development as treatment for unexplained infertility.
Method: A total of 205 couples completed the trial. Sixty-seven couples underwent treatment with IPI (group A) and 138 couples underwent treatment with IUI (group B).
Results: Clinical pregnancy was obtained in 23 couples in group A (pregnancy rate: 34.3%) and in 36 couples in group B (pregnancy rate: 26.1%). No significant difference was observed between group A and group B. As for the evolution of pregnancies and the incidence of twin pregnancies, no significant difference was observed between the two groups.
Conclusions: Because IUI and IPI allow us to obtain same results and IPI is more invasive than IUI, the latter technique can be considered the method of choice and IPI should be used when IUI is difficult to perform, as in the presence of a tight cervical canal.
Key words: intraperitoneal insemination, intrauterine insemination, multicenter study, multiple follicular development, unexplained infertility
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (514.2 KB).
Footnotes
The following persons from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy, also contributed to the conduct and analysis of the study: V. Mais and A. M. Paoletti.
References
- 1.Melis GB, Paoletti AM, Strigini F, Menchini-Fabris F, Canale D, Fioretti P. Pharmacologic induction of multiple follicular development improves the success rate of artificial insemination with husband’s semen in couples with male-related or unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril. 1987;47:441–445. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59052-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Allen NC, Herbert CM, Maxon WS, Rogers BJ, Diamond MP, Colston-Wents A. Intrauterine insemination: a critical review. Fertil Steril. 1985;44:569–573. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48969-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Forrler A, Dellenbach P, Nisand I, Moreau L, Cranz C, Clavert A, Rumpler Y. Direct intraperitoneal insemination in unexplained and cervical infertility. Lancet. 1986;1:916–917. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91021-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cimino C, Guastella G, Camporetto G, Gullo D, Perino A, Benigno MA, Barba G, Cittadini E. Direct intraperitoneal insemination (DIPI) for the treatment of refractory infertility unrelated to female organic pelvic disease. Acta Eur Fertil. 1988;19:61–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hovatta O, Kurumaki H, Tiitien A, Lahteenmaki P, Koskimies AI. Direct intraperitoneal or intrauterine insemination and superovulation in infertility treatment: A randomized study. Fertil Steril. 1990;54:339–339. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53714-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Crosignani PG, Walters DE, Soliani A. The ESHRE multicentre trial on the treatment of unexplained infertility: A preliminary report. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:953–958. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Evans J, Wells C, Gregory L, Walker S. A comparison of intrauterine insemination, intraperitoneal insemination, and natural intercourse in superovulated women. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:1183–1187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gregoriuo O, Papadias C, Konidaris S, Gargaropoulos A, Kalampokas E. A randomized comparison of intrauterine and intraperitoneal insemination in the treatment of infertility. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1993;42:33–36. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(93)90442-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Karlstrom PO, Bergh T, Lundkvist O. A prospective randomized trial of artificial insemination versus intercourse in cycles stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin or clomiphene citrate. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:554–559. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Melis GB, Paoletti AM, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Depau GF, Mais V. Ovulation induction with gonadotropins as sole treatment in infertile couples with open tubes: A randomized prospective comparison between intrauterine insemination and timed vaginal intercourse. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:1088–93. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57965-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 3rd ed. London: Blackwell Scientific; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Manhes H, Hermabessier J: Fecondation intraperitoneale. Premiere grossesse obtenue sur indication masculine. Presented at the 3rd International Forum Andrology, Paris, 1985, p 32 (abstract)
- 13.Tesarik J, Mendoza OC, Testart J. Effect of the human cumulus oophorus on movement characteristics of human capacitated spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 1990;88:665–675. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0880665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Suarez SS, Wolf DP, Meizel S. Induction of the acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa by a fraction of human follicular fluid. Gamete Res. 1986;14:107–121. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1120140203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Turhan NO, Artini PG, D’Ambrogio G, Droghini F, Volpe A, Genazzani AR. Studies on direct intraperitoneal insemination in the management of male factor, cervical factor, unexplained and immunological infertility. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:66–72. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Karlstrom P-O, Bakos O, Palmstierna M, Bergh T, Lundkvist O. Direct intraperitoneal insemination—Clinical results and comparison between two methods of sperm preparation. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:939–945. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ragni G, Lombroso GC, Laurentis L, Olivares MD, Cristiani C, Crosignani PG. Pregnancy after direct intraperitoneal insemination of spermatozoa from a man with severe infertility, after unsuccessful application of other methods of assisted fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:225–226. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Campos-Liete E, Insull M, Kennedy SH, Ellis JD, Sargent I, Barlow DH. A controlled assessment of direct intraperitoneal insemination. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:168–173. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54795-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]