Abstract
Purpose: Increasing numbers of couples are consulting for infertility and, after some years of investigation and treatment, will become enrolled in in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs. The media have focused on successful outcomes or difficulties in accessing services because of health authority funding guidelines. Couples are often assumed to be highly motivated because of their long prior involvement in treatment. However, little is known about uptake of and continuation through IVF treatment programs.
Methods: One hundred forty-four couples were followed through the process of IVF in a service that allows three cycles of treatment, with a minimum gap of 3 months between treatment cycles. Patterns of engagement in and delay and withdrawal from treatment were examined.
Results: One in five couples withdrew from the program before completion of the available number of treatment cycles. A further one in three significantly delayed their involvement in treatment cycles. Mean deviations of the time between attempts increased as the number of treatment cycles progressed. A proportion of couples did not complete a single treatment cycle.
Conclusions: The dramatic proportions of patients withdrawing from or very significantly delaying subsequent involvement are indicative of the often unacknowledged difficulties associated with IVF treatment. Implications for care are discussed.
Keywords: in vitro fertilization, treatment progress
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (630.8 KB).
REFERENCES
- 1.Templeton A, Fraser C, Thompson B. Infertility—epidemiology and referral practice. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:1391–1394. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.MRC Working Party on Children Conceived by In-Vitro Fertilisation Births in Britain resulting from assisted conception. 1990;300:1229–1233. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6734.1229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Laffont I, Edelmann RJ. Perceived support and counselling needs in relation to in-vitro fertilisation. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;15:183–188. doi: 10.3109/01674829409025644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Slade P, Emery J, Lieberman BA. A prospective, longitudinal study of emotions and relationships in in-vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(1):183–190. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.1.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hull MGR, Eddowes HA, Fahy U, et al. Expectations of assisted conception treatments for infertility. A complete account of current practice. BMJ. 1992;304:1456–1459. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6840.1465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]