Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 1998 May;15(5):302–307. doi: 10.1023/A:1022548612107

Successful Use of a Laser for Human Embryo Biopsy in Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Report of Two Cases

M Boada 1,✉, M Carrera 2, C De La Iglesia 2, M Sandalinas 1, P N Barri 1, A Veiga 1
PMCID: PMC3454754  PMID: 9604764

Abstract

Purpose:The use of Tyrode's acid to drill the zona pellucida for embryo biopsy is the most widely used methodology in preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Instead of this, we propose the use of a 1.48-μm diode noncontact laser, which is quicker, simpler, and safer.

Methods:The laser beam was tangentially guided to the zona pellucida of the embryo. Depending on zona pellucida measurement, two to four consecutive shots of 8–22 msec were necessary to drill the zona pellucida of the 13 embryos biopsied for two patients (hemophilia carriers).

Results:Female embryos were replaced into the uterus of the patients (1.5 embryos/replacement). One single pregnancy was established (33.3% implantation rate). Coculture of untransferable embryos showed a blastocyst rate of 66.7% (4/6) for male embryos and 25% (1/4) for abnormal ones.

Conclusions:These results demonstrate the safety and usefulness of laser methodology in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Keywords: diode laser beam, embryo biopsy, microdrilling, preimplantation diagnosis, zona pellucida

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.5 MB).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Edwards RG. Maturation in vitro of human ovarian oocytes. Lancet. 1965;2:926–929. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(65)92903-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Handyside AH, Kontogianni FH, Hardy K, Winston RML. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature. 1990;244:768–770. doi: 10.1038/344768a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liu J, Lissens W, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I. Efficiency and accuracy of polymerase-chain-reation assay for cystic fibrosis allele delta F508 in single cell. Lancet. 1992;339:1190–1192. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91133-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Handyside AH, Lesko JG, Tarin JJ, Winston RML, Hughes MR. Birth of a normal girl after in vitro fertilisation and preimplantation diagnostic testing for cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:905–909. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199209243271301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Munné S, Lee A, Rosenwaks Z, Grifó J, Cohen J. Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:2185–2191. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hardy KI, Martin KL, Leese HJ, Winston RML, Handyside AH. Human preimplantation development in vitro is not adversely affected by biopsy at the 8 cell-stage. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:708–714. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Harper JC. Preimplantation diagnosis of inherited disease by embryo biopsy: An update of the world figures. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996;13:1–6. doi: 10.1007/BF02072527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tarin JJ, Handyside AH. Embryo biopsy strategies for preimplantation diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:943–952. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55908-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gordon JW, Gang Y. Use of zona drilling for safe and effective biopsy of murine oocytes and embryos. Biol Reprod. 1990;42:869–876. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod42.6.869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Roudebush WE, Kim JG, Minhas BS, Dodson MG. Survival and cell acquisition rates after preimplantation embryo biopsy: Use of two mechanical techniques and two mouse strains. Am J Obset Gynecol. 1990;162:1084–1090. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91321-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pierce KE, Michalopoulos J, Kiessling AA, Seibel MM, Zilberstein M. Preimplantation development of mouse and human embryos biopsied at cleavage stages using a modified displacement technique. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:351–356. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.2.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Garissi GJ, Talansky BE, Grunfeld L, Sapira V, Navot D, Gordon JW. Clinical evaluation of three approaches to micromanipulation-assisted fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1990;54:671–677. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Malter HE, Cohen J. Partial zona dissection of the human oocyte: A nontraumetic method using micromanipulation to assist zona pellucida penetration. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:139–148. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60443-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tadir Y, Wrigh WH, Vafa O, Ord T, Asch R, Berns MW. Micromanipulation of sperm by laser generated optical trap. Fertil Steril. 1989;52:870–873. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Feichtinger W, Strohmer H, Fuhrberg P, Radivojevic K, Antinori S, Pepe G, Versaci C. Photoablation of oocyte zona pellucida by erbium-yag laser for in vitro fertilisation in severe male infertility. Lancet. 1992;339:811. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91938-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cohen J. Assisted hatching of human embryos. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer. 1991;8:179–190. doi: 10.1007/BF01130802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rink K, Delacrétaz G, Salathé RP, Senn A, Nocera D, Germond M, Fakav S. 1.48-μm diode laser microdissection of the zona pellucida of mouse zygotes. Proc SPIE. 1994;2134A:412–422. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rink K, Delacrétaz G, Salathé RP, Senn A, Nocera D, Germond M, De Grandi P, Fakav S. Non-contact microdrilling of mouse zona pellucida with an objective-delivered 1.48-μm diode laser. Lasers Surg Med. 1996;18:52–62. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)18:1<52::AID-LSM7>3.0.CO;2-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Strohmer H, Feichtinger W. Successful clinical application of laser for micromanipulation in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:212–214. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55166-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tadir Y, Wright WH, Vafa O, Liaw LH, Asch R, Berns MW. Micromanipulation of gametesusing laser microbeams. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:1011–1016. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rasmussen RE, Hammer-Wilson M, Berns MW. Mutation and sister chromatid exchange induction in chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells by pulsed excimer laser radiation at 193 nm and 308 nm and continuous UV radiation at 254nm. Photochem Photobiol. 1989;49:413–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb09188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Neev J, Gonzalez A, Licciardi F, Alikani M, Tadir Y, Berns M, Cohen J. Opening of the mouse zona pellucida by laser without a micromanipulator. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:939–944. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Antinori S, Versaci C, Furhrberg P, Panci C, Caffa B, Hossein Gholami G. Seventeen live births after the use of an erbiumyytrium aluminium garnet laser in the treatment of male factor infertility. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1891–1896. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Germond M, Nocera D, Senn A, Rink K, Delacrétaz G, Fakan S. Microdissection of mouse and human zona pellucida using a 1.48-μm diode laser beam: Efficacy and safety of the procedure. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:604–611. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57800-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Germond M, Nocera D, Senn A, Rink K, Delacrétaz G, Pedrazzini T, Hornung JP. Improved fertilization and implantation rates after non-touch zona pellucida microdrilling of mouse oocytes with a 1.48μm diode laser beam. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1043–1048. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Boada M, Coroleu B, Calderón G, Carreras O, Vendrell JM, Veiga A, Barri PN: Resultados anuales del programa de fecundación in vitro del Institut Universitari Dexeus. 1996. Prog. Obstet. Ginecol (in press)
  • 27.Tarkowski AK. An air drying method for chromosome preparations from mouse eggs. Cytogenetics. 1966;5:394–400. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Santaló J, Estop AM, Egozcue J. The chromosome complement of first cleavage mouse embryos alter in vitro fertilization. J, Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer. 1986;3:99–105. doi: 10.1007/BF01139354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Veiga A, Torelló MJ, Boiso I, Sandalinas M, Busquets A, Calderón G, Barri PN. Optimization of implantation in the in vitro fertilization laboratory. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(Suppl2):98–106. doi: 10.1093/humrep/10.suppl_2.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ménézo Y, Veiga A: Cryopreservation of blastocysts. In In Vitro Fertilization and Assisted Reproduction. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of In Vitro Fertilization and Assisted Reproduction. Vancouver, 1997. V Gomel, P CK Leung (eds), International Proceedings Division, 1997, pp 49-53
  • 31.Montag M, Van der Ven K, Van der Ven H, Delacretaz G, Rink K. Laser assisted opening of the zona pellucida facilitates polar body biopsy. Abstracts of the 13th Annual Meeting of ESHRE, Edinburghr, 1997. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:10. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Montag M, Van der Ven K, Delacretaz G, Rink K, Van der Ven H. Efficient preimplantation genetic diagnosis using laser assisted microdissection of the zona pellucida for polar body biopsy followed by primed in situ labeling (PRINS). Abstracts from Second International Symposium on Preimplantation Genetics, Chicago 1997. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14:455. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Veiga A, Sandalinas M, Benkhalifa M, Boada M, Carrera M, Rink K, Delacretaz G, Germond M, Barri PN, Ménézo Y. Laser blastocyst biposy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis in the human. Abstracts from Second International Symposium on Preimplantation Genetics, Chicago 1997. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14:476. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Veiga A, Sandalinas M, Benkhalifa M, Boada M, Carrera M, Santaló J, Barri PN, Ménézo Y: Laser blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis in the human: Zygote (in press) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 35.Wilton L, Trounson A. Biopsy of preimplantation mouse embryos: Development of micromanipulated embryos and proliferation of single blastomeres in vitro. Biol Reprod. 1989;40:145–152. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod40.1.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Takenchi K, Sandow B, Morsy M, Kaufmann R, Beelse S, Hodgen G. Preclinical models for human pre-embryo biopsy and genetic diagnosis I. Efficiency and normalcy of mouse pre-embryo development after different biopsy techniques. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:425–430. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54858-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES