Skip to main content
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 1998 May;15(5):349–357. doi: 10.1023/A:1022517232580

Evolutionary Classification of Homeodomains

Viktor Gindilis 1,, Eugene Goltsman 1, Yury Verlinsky 1
PMCID: PMC3454761  PMID: 9604773

Abstract

Purpose and Methods:We performed multiple comparisons between available amino acid (aa) sequences of homeodomain(HOM)-containing proteins from a wide spectrum of animals to create an evolutionary classification of the proteins.

Results:Based on results of statistical and special computational analyses of over 500 homeodomain aa sequences (HOMs) a novel system of concepts describing complex structural correlations between homologous proteins is proposed. This system includes such notions as differentiated isofunctionality of aa, chemotype, stereotype, local functional motifs, gradual conservativeness of aa positions, and group-specific domain patterns, as well as major categories of the evolutionary classification of HOMs (Division, Type, Branch, Class, Family, Series, Variety, Sort). Using this approach, a complete structural systematics of HOMs belonging to proteomes of eukaryotic animals is proposed.

Conclusions:The proposed structural classification of HOMs is in full agreement with the bulk of experimental data revealing complex functional similarities and differences among HOMs in terms of their expression patterns in developing embryos. It turn, this classification can provide answers regarding homology among homeodomains when experimental data are conflicting.

Keywords: homeobox-containing genes, homeodomain-containing transcription factors, amino acid isofunctionality, homeodomain patterns, homeoprotein classification

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.4 MB).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gindilis VM, Ageev SV: HuNeG project: The progress report of 1993–94 on the Scottish Rite SRP Huneg grant award, Oct 1994, pp 1-31. (Office of the SRP, P.O. Box 519, 33 Marret Road, Lexington, MA 02173)
  • 2.Scott MP, Tamkun JW, Hartzell GW. The structure and function of the homeodomain. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989;989:25–48. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(89)90033-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burglin TR. A comprehensive classification of homeobox genes. In: Duboule D, editor. Guidebook to the Homeobox Genes. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994. pp. 25–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stein S, Fritsch R, Lemaire L, Kessel M. Checklist: Vertebrate homebox genes. Mech Dev. 1996;55:91–108. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(95)00494-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abouhief E, Akam M, Dickinson WJ, Holland PWH, Meyer A, Patel NH, Raff RA, Roth Wray GA. Homology and developmental gene. Trends Genet. 1997;13:432–433. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(97)01271-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gindilis V, Banikazemi M, Vyasankin A, Verlinsky O, Matveyev I, Verlinsky Y. Borders, patterns, and distinctive families of homeodomains. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1994;11:244–269. doi: 10.1007/BF02214344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gindilis VM, Verlinsky Y: Reconstruction of mutational history in the evolution of the caudal-like homeodomain family. J Mol Evol (in press)
  • 8.Islam SA, Luo J, Sternberg MJE. Identification and analysis of domains in proteins. Prot Eng. 1995;8:513–525. doi: 10.1093/protein/8.6.513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schmidt W. Phylogeny reconstruction for protein sequences based on amino acid properties. J Mol Evol. 1995;41:522–530. doi: 10.1007/BF00160324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jiwani NG, Liebman MN. Structure-function analysis of amino acid substitutions in proteins. In: Kumosinski TF, Liebman MN, editors. Molecular Modeling. Washington, DC: Am Chem Soc; 1994. pp. 184–206. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science. 1991;253:164–170. doi: 10.1126/science.1853201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Taylor WR. The classification of amino acid conservation. J Theor Biol. 1986;119:205–218. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(86)80075-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kidera A, Konishi Y, Oka M, Ooi T, Scheraga HA. Statistical analysis of the physical properties of the 20 naturally occuring amino acids. J Prot Chem. 1985;4:23–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ratner V, Jarkich A, Kolchanov N. I. Problems of the Molecular Evolution Theory. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1985. pp. 63–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Swanson R. A unifying concept for the amino acid code. Bull Math Biol. 1984;46:187–203. doi: 10.1007/BF02460068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Burglin TR. Analysis of TALE superclass homeobox genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4173–4180. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.21.4173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Duprey P, Chowdhury K, Dressler GR, Balling R, Simon D, Guenet J-L, Gruss P. A mouse gene homologous to the Drosophila gene caudal is expressed in epithelial cells from the embryonic intestine. Genes Dev. 1988;2:1647–1654. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.12a.1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hu Y, Kazenwadel J, James R. Isolation and characterization of the murine homeobox gene Cdx-1. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:27214–27225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES