Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine differences in the quality of human sperm processed through different lots of silane-coated silica particle colloid solutions. The objectives were to compare (a) sperm kinematic parameters, (b) the sperm acrosome status, (c) the membrane integrity of the head and tail regions, (d) the DNA normality, and (e) the heat-inducible hyperactivation motility after processing sperm through either a Silane-coated silica particle colloid solution, a Percoll solution, or a simple centrifuge sperm wash (control).
Methods: Sperm cells were derived from pooled cryopreserved-thawed specimens of several donors (n=10). The pooled sperm were divided and processed through either the centrifuge wash, the 90:47% two-layer Percoll, or one of three lots of silane-coated silica particle colloidal solutions from three vendors. Aliquots of sperm cells were analyzed using the Hamilton-Thorn HTM-C motility analyzer for differences in kinematics and hyperactivation. Sperm were also analyzed for membrane integrity at both head and tail regions, normal morphology, acrosome status, and viability. Sperm undergoing apoptosis were determined using the acridine orange stain. Processed sperm were also incubated at 40°C for 4 hr and the quality of the sperm was assessed using the heat-induced hyperactivation and motility parameter.
Results: The data showed that after sperm processing, the number of sperm recovered was higher for the three lots of colloids (silane-coated silica particle colloid solutions) compared with Percoll processing. Total sperm motility was higher in the colloidal washes compared with the control. There were no differences in motility between Percoll- and colloid-processed sperm. In contrast, the percentages of sperm exhibiting progressive motility or hyperactivation varied among the different lots of colloid solutions. The Percoll wash solution yielded the highest percentage of sperm with intact tail membranes, whereas some lots of colloid solutions disrupted sperm head membranes. The percentages of sperm undergoing apoptosis varied for the different lots of colloid solutions. There was a marked increase in hyperactivation associated with one colloid solution after heat induction.
Conclusions: The results demonstrated variability in the different lots of silane-coated silica particle colloid solutions for processing sperm. Each lot of colloid solution excelled at improving different sperm parameters. The silane-coated silica particle colloid solutions were shown to be effective in recovering motile sperm compared with Percoll but the types of motility and sperm quality varied for the different lots of colloid solutions. Due to the variability in lots of silane-coated silica colloid solutions, reported studies based on only one lot or one source of colloid solution may be difficult to interpret. Furthermore, it may be advantageous to select the best lot of silane-coated silica particle colloid solution to produce the highest number of sperm exhibiting the ideal parameters for use in assisted reproduction technologies.
Key words: spermatozoa, Percoll, isolate, Silane, polyvinylpyrrolidone, sperm wash
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (588.7 KB).
References
- 1.McClure RD, Nunes L, Tom R. Semen manipulation: Improved sperm recovery and function with a two-layer Percoll gradient. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:874–877. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60683-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ruiz-Romero J, Antich M, Bassas L. Choosing among different technical variations of Percoll centrifugation for sperm selection. Andrologia. 1995;27:149–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1995.tb01086.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Alvarez JG, Minaretzis D, Barrett CB, Mortola JF, Thompson IE. The sperm stress test: A novel test that predicts pregnancy in assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:400–405. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58107-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Burkman LJ. Experimental approaches to evaluation and enhancement of sperm function. In: Jones HW, Jones GS, Hodgen GD, Rosenwaks Z, editors. In Vitro Fertilization, Norfolk. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1986. pp. 201–208. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chan PJ, Tredway DR, Su BC, Corselli J, Pang SC. A double method sperm wash for artificial insemination. Arch Androl. 1992;29:43–48. doi: 10.3109/01485019208987707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Oettle EE, Soley JT. Ultrastructural changes in the acrosome of human sperm during freezing and thawing. Arch Androl. 1986;17:145–150. doi: 10.3109/01485018608990187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Eliasson R, Treichl MB. Supravital staining of human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril. 1971;22:134–137. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)38049-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chan PJ, Tredway DR, Corselli J, Pang SC, Su BC. Combined supravital staining and hypoosmotic swelling test. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:1115–1118. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jeyendran RS, Ven HH, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo BG, Zaneveld LJD. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fertil. 1984;70:219–228. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0700219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tejada RI, Mitchell JC, Norman A, Marik JJ, Friedman S. A test for the practical evaluation of male fertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. Fertil Steril. 1984;42:87–91. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47963-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gorczyca W, Traganos F, Jesionowska H, Darzynkiewic Z. Presence of DNA strands breaks and increased sensitivity of DNA in situ to denaturation in abnormal human sperm cells: Analogy to apoptosis of somatic cells. Exp Cell Res. 1993;207:202–205. doi: 10.1006/excr.1993.1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barros C. Capacitation of mammalian spermatozoa. In: Coutinho E, Fuchs F, editors. Physiology and Genetics of Reproduction, Part B. Boston: Plenum; 1974. pp. 3–24. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bedford JM. Sperm capacitation and fertilization in mammals. Biol Reprod (Suppl) 1970;2:128–158. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod2.Supplement_2.128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Arora M, Carver-Ward JA, Jaroudi KA, Sieck UV. Is Percoll safe for in vivo use? Fertil Steril. 1994;61:979–981. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56718-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]