Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genes & Nutrition logoLink to Genes & Nutrition
. 2006 Mar;1(1):13–22. doi: 10.1007/BF02829932

Ethical issues raised by personalized nutrition based on genetic information

Ulf Görman 1,✉
PMCID: PMC3454816  PMID: 18850217

Abstract

Four principles are taken as basis for the ethical analysis: autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice. Health is understood as a limited aspect of wellbeing. Food is understood as an important aspect of wellbeing, not only an instrument for health. Modern society is characterized by a tendency to identify wellbeing with external rather than subjective circumstances, to identify wellbeing with health, and to create exaggerated health expectations. Based upon this understanding, aspects of personalized nutrition are discussed: genetic testing, counselling, and development of special dietary products. Today the predictive value of genetic tests for personal nutrition is limited, and experimental at best. Recommendations for the future: Personalized nutrition must be based on solid knowledge. Phenotypic analyses should be used when adequate. When a genetic test can have a clear advantage, this should be preferred. Opportunistic screening should only be used when clearly beneficial. Specially trained persons should collect information from genetic tests and carry through councelling on a personal basis. Marketing of genetic tests directly sold to the public should be discouraged. Development of special products for personalized nutrition may be necessary in some cases. However, this may also lead to a medicalization of diet.

Key words: Ethics, Genetic test, Health, Nutritional genomics, Personalized nutrition, Wellbeing

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (114.0 KB).

References

  1. Alber J., Fahey T. Perceptions of living conditions in an enlarged Europe. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European communities; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  2. Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bioethics Advisory committee, Singapore (2005) Genetic testing and genetic research. (Singapore). http://www.bioethics-singapore.org
  4. Colditz G.A., Willett W.C., Rotnitzsky A., Manson J.E. Weight gain as a risk factor for clinical diabetes mellitus in women. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1995;122:481–486. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-7-199504010-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Conrad P. Medicalization and social control. Annual Review of Sociology. 1992;18:209–232. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Council of Europe Working party on Human Genetics (2003) Working document on the applications of genetics for health purposes, CDBI/INF. 3, Strasbourg. http://www.coe.int/T/E/ Legal_affairs/Legal_co-operation/ Bioethics/ Activities/ Human_genetics/INF(2003)3e_genetics_working_doc.asp
  7. Crawford R. Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services. 1980;10:365–388. doi: 10.2190/3H2H-3XJN-3KAY-G9NY. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. EUR 21120 — The 25 recommendations on the ethical, legal and social implications of genetic testing. Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S., Read S., Combs B. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences. 1978;9:127–152. doi: 10.1007/BF00143739. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fitzpatrick M. The tyranny of health. Doctors and the regulation of lifestyle. London: Routledge; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  11. Getting personal: shifting responsibilities for dietary health. Brighton: Food ethics council; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gibney M.J., Gibney E.R. Diet, genes and disease: implications for nutrition policy. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2004;63:491–500. doi: 10.1079/PNS2004369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Greenhalgh T., Wessely S. Health for me’: a sociocultural analysis of healthism in the middle classes. British Medical Bulletin. 2004;69:197–213. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldh013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Illich I. Medical Nemesis. The Expropriation of Health. New York: Pantheon Books; 1976. [Google Scholar]
  15. Joost, H.-G. and Mathers, J. (2005) Personalized nutrition: Status and perspectives, (Unpublished draft document).
  16. Juth N. Genetic information — Values and rights. The morality of presymptomatic testing. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  17. Levy H.L. Phenylketonuria: Old disease, new approach to treatment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999;96:1811–1813. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.5.1811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Loewenstein G. F., Weber E. U., Hsee C. K., Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin. 2001;127:267–286. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Löwendahl L. Med kroppen som instrument. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  20. Magnusson M. Consumer perception of organic and genetically modified foods. Health and environmental considerations. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  21. Meijboom F.L.B., Verweij M.F., Brom F.W.A. You eat what you are: moral dimensions of diets tailored to one’s genes. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 2003;16:557–568. doi: 10.1023/B:JAGE.0000004964.85970.8d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mitsis P. Epicurus’ ethical theory. The pleasures of invulnerability. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1988. [Google Scholar]
  23. Nordenfelt L. On the nature of health. An action-theoretic approach. 2nd ed. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  24. O’Grady, K. The Medicalization of menopause. http:// www.cwhn.ca/resources/menopause/
  25. Oviedo Convention (1997) Convention for the protection of human beings and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: Convention of human rights and biomedicine. (European treaty series 164.) http:// conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/196.htm
  26. Philipson S.M., Uddenberg N., editors. Hälsa som livsmening. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  27. Rose G. The strategy of preventive medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rose G., Hamilton P.J.S., Colwell L., Shipley M.J. A randomised controlled trial of anti-smoking advice: 10-year results. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1982;36:102–108. doi: 10.1136/jech.36.2.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sahi, T. (1994) Genetics and epidemiology of adult-type hypolactasia.Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology202 Supplement. 7–20. [DOI] [PubMed]
  30. Sjöberg L. Gene Technology in the eyes of the public and experts. Moral opinions, attitudes and risk perception, (SSE/ EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration No 2004:7) Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  31. Skrabanek P. The death of humane medicine and the rise of coercive healthism. London: The social affairs unit; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  32. Song Y., Niu T., Manson J.E., Kwiatkowski D.J., Liu S. Are variants in the CAPN10 gene related to risk of type 2 diabetes? A quantitative assessment of population and family-based association studies. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2004;74:208–22. doi: 10.1086/381400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sumner L.W. Welfare, happiness, and ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wahrman M.Z. Brave New Judaism. When science and scripture collide. Hanover and London: Brandeis University Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wertz, D.C., Fletcher, J.C. and Berg, K. (2003) Review of Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics. Report of consultants to WHO. World Health Organisation, Human genetics Programme. http:// www.who.int/entity/genomics/publications/en/ ethical_issuesin_medgenetics%20report.pdf
  36. WHO (1946) Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization, adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946. http://www.who.int/about/ definition/en/

Articles from Genes & Nutrition are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES