Skip to main content
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 1998 Nov;15(10):605–608. doi: 10.1023/A:1020333427698

Effects of Reducing Insemination Time in Human In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Development by Using Sibling Oocytes

Serdar Coskun 1,, Gayle L Roca 1, Atif M Elnour 1, Hend Al Mayman 1, Johannes M G Hollanders 2, Kamal A Jaroudi 2
PMCID: PMC3454860  PMID: 9866069

Abstract

Purpose:Recent studies showed a beneficial effect of reducing the time of sperm–oocyte interaction on fertilization, division, and implantation rates of the oocytes obtained from randomized patients. In the present study, the effects of reduced insemination time on fertilization and embryo development were evaluated by using sibling oocytes from the same patient.

Methods:A total of 464 oocytes from 36 patients was randomly allocated to be inseminated for either 1 hr (reduced) or 18 hr (regular).

Results:Fertilization rates were not significantly different between reduced (135/229; 59%) and regular (150/235; 64%) groups. Cleavage rates and embryo quality were similar in both groups. A total of 135 embryos (73 from the reduced and 62 from the regular group) was transferred to 36 patients. Thirty-four embryos implanted in 18 patients (25.2% implantation and 50.0% pregnancy rates).

Conclusions:Fertilization, cleavage, and embryo development from 1-hr insemination is comparable, not superior, to those from an 18-hr insemination time, which is commonly used in in vitro fertilization programs. These data suggest that reduced insemination time can be used during in vitro fertilization to avoid unnecessarily longer exposure to spermatozoa.

Keywords: embryo, fertilization, human, in vitro fertilization, reduced insemination

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (398.6 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Harper MJK. Gamete and zygote transport. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, editors. The Physiology of Reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1994. pp. 123–187. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bedford JM, Kim HH. Cumulus oophorus as a sperm sequestering device in vivo. J Exp Zool. 1993;265:321–328. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402650314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Fiorentino A, Tosti E, Panzella S, Dale B. Reducing the time of sperm-oocyte interaction in human in vitro fertilization improves the implantation rate. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:166–171. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aitken RJ, Buckingam DW, West K, Brindle J. On the use of paramagnetic beads and ferrofluids to assess and eliminate the leukocytic contribution to oxygen radical generation by human sperm suspension. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1996;35:541–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1996.tb00055.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krausz C, Mills C, Rogers S, Tan SL, Aitken RJ. Stimulation of oxidant generation by human sperm suspensions using phorbol esters and phormyl peptides: Relationships with motility and fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril. 1994;62:599–605. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56952-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nasr-Esfahani MH, Aitken JR, Johnson MH. Hydrogen peroxide levels in mouse oocytes and early cleavage stage embryos developed in vitro or in vivo. Development. 1990;109:501–507. doi: 10.1242/dev.109.2.501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Waldenstrom U, Hamberger L, Nilsson L, Ryding M. Short-time sperm-egg exposure to prevent zona hardening. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993;10:OC 245. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gianaroli L, Fiorentino A, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Montanaro N. Prolonged sperm-oocyte exposure and high sperm concentration affect human embryo viability and pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2507–2511. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bergh C, Waldenstrom U, Hamberger L. Reducing the time of spermatozoa-oocyte interaction in human IVF improves the implantation rate (Letter to the Editor) Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1809–1813. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Walters DE. Reducing the time of spermatozoa-oocyte interaction in human IVF improves the implantation rate (Letter to the Editor) Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1809–1813. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yanagimachi R. Mammalian fertilization. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, editors. The Physiology of Reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1994. pp. 189–317. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Baker HWG, Brindle J, Irvine DS, Aitken RJ. Protective effect of antioxidants impairment of sperm motility by activated polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:411–419. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58109-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hall J, Fishel S, Green S, Fleming S, Hunter A, Stoddart N, Dowell K, Thornton S. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus high insemination concentration in-vitro fertilization in cases of very severe teratozoospermia. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:493–496. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Oehninger S, Kruger TF, Simon T, Jones D, Mayer S, Lanzendorf S, Toner JP, Muasher A comparative analysis of embryo implantation potential in patients with severe teratozoospermia undergoing in-vitro fertilization with a high insemination concentration or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1086–1089. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang D, Shahata MA, Al-Bader M, Al-Natsha SD, Al-Flamerzia M, Shawaf TA. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection improving embryo quality: Comparison of the sibling oocytes of nonmale factor couples. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996;13:351–355. doi: 10.1007/BF02070151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES