Skip to main content
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 1998 Apr;15(4):210–214. doi: 10.1023/A:1023004503697

The Influence of Advanced Age on the Outcome of Assisted Reproduction

Jennifer E Dew 1,, Ronald A Don 1, Graeme J Hughes 1, Trevor C Johnson 1, Stephen J Steigrad 1
PMCID: PMC3454935  PMID: 9565851

Abstract

Purpose:Our purpose was to determine the influence of age on the outcome of assisted reproduction, with particular interest in women aged 40 years or older.

Methods:A retrospective review of the 779 patients enrolled in the Royal Hospital for Women Fertility Group fertility program between 1987 and 1994 was performed. The results for women aged 40 years or older were compared with those for women between 36 and 39 years and those younger than 36 years. The main outcome measures were pregnancy rate, pregnancy outcome, fertilization rate, and ovarian response.

Results:Compared with those in younger women, pregnancy rate, pregnancy outcome, fertilization rate, and ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation were significantly worse in women aged 40 years or older.

Conclusions:The outcome of assisted reproduction in women of 40 years of age or older was extremely poor. Compared with those in younger women, pregnancy outcome and ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation were significantly worse in women of 40 years or more.

Keywords: age, assisted reproduction, infertility, pregnancy outcome

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (577.2 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Federation CECOS. Schwartz D, Mayaux MJ. Female fecundity as a function of age. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:404–406. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198202183060706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.van Noord-Zaadstra BM, Looman CWN, Alsbach H, Habbema JDF, te Velde ER, Karbaat J. Delaying childbearing: Effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy. BMJ. 1991;302:1361–1365. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6789.1361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Al-Shawaf T, Nolan A, Guirgis R, Harper J, Santis M, Craft I. The influence of ovarian response on gamete intra-fallopian transfer outcome in older women. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:1106–1110. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wood C, Calderon I, Crombie A. Age and fertility: Results of assisted reproductive technology in women over 40 years. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1992;9:482–484. doi: 10.1007/BF01204055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.FIVNAT. Piette C, de Mouzon J, Bachelor A, Spira A. In-vitro fertilisation: Influence of women's age on pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:56–59. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kenny DT. The impact of maternal age on clinical pregnancy and spontaneous abortion in women undergoing gamete in vitro fertilization and gamete intra-fallopian transfer. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;34(4):443–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1994.tb01267.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Segal S, Casper RF. The response to ovarian hyperstimulation and in-vitro fertilisation in women older than 35 years. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:225–227. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Romeu A, Muasher SJ, Acosta AA, Veeck LL, Diaz J, Jones GS, Jones HW, Rosenwaks Z. Results of in vitro fertilization attempts in women 40 years of age and older: The Norfolk experience. Fertil Steril. 1987;47:130–136. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49948-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bopp BL, Alper MM, Thompson IE, Mortola J. Success rates with gamete intrafallopian transfer and in vitro fertilization in women of advanced maternal age. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:1278–1283. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57611-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Navot D, Bergh PA, Williams MA, Garrisi GJ, Guzman I, Sandler B, Grunfeld L. Poor oocyte quality rather than implantation failure as a cause of age-related decline in female fertility. Lancet. 1991;337:1375–1377. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93060-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tan SL, Royston P, Campbell S, Jacobs HS, Betts J, Mason B, Edwards RG. Cumulative conception and livebirth rates after in-vitro fertilisation. Lancet. 1992;339:1390–1394. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91205-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shenfield F, Doyle P, Valentine A, Steele SJ, Tan SL. Effects of age, gravidity and male infertility status on cumulative conception rates following artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor semen: Analysis of 2998 cycles of treatment in one centre over 10 years. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:1106–1110. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Craft I, Brinsden P. Alternatives to IVF: The outcome of 1071 first GIFT Procedures. Hum Report. 1989;4(Suppl):29–36. doi: 10.1093/humrep/4.suppl_1.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abdalla HI, Burton G, Kirkland A, Johnson MR, Leonard T, Brooks AA, Studd WW. Age, pregnancy and miscarriage: Uterine versus ovarian factors. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1512–1517. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Saunders DM, Lancaster P. The wider perinatal significance of the Australian in vitro fertilization data collection program. Am J Perinatol. 1989;6:252–255. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lancaster P, Shafir E, Nuang J. Assisted Conception Series Number 1 Assisted Conception Australia and New Zealand 1992 and 1993. Sydney: AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hughes EG, Robertson DM, Handelsman DJ, Hayward S, Healy DL, de Kretser DM. Inhibin and estradiol responses to ovarian hyperstimulation: Effects of age and predictive value for in vitro fertilization outcome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;70:358–364. doi: 10.1210/jcem-70-2-358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Meldrum DR. Female reproductive aging—Ovarian and uterine factors. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:1–5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55608-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Balmaceda JP, Gonzales J, Bernardini L: Gamete and zygote intrafallopian transfers and related techniques. Curr Sci 1992;743–749 [PubMed]
  • 20.Tucker MJ, Morton PC, Wright G, Sweitzer CL, Ingargiola PE, Chan SYW. Paternal influences on embryogenesis and pregnancy in assisted human reproduction. JBFS. 1996;1(2):90–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gallardo E, Simon C, Levy M, Guanes PP, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Effect of age on sperm fertility potential: Oocyte donation as a model. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:260–264. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58450-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES