Skip to main content
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 2005 Mar;22(3):129–131. doi: 10.1007/s10815-005-4878-6

Down syndrome and precocious menopause

Ana Karina Bartmann 1,3, Francielle M Araújo 1, Odilon Iannetta 1, João C C Paneto 2, Lúcia Martelli 2, Ester Silveira Ramos 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC3455174  PMID: 16018243

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether women who had children with Down syndrome (DS) had precocious menopause.

Methods: We selected 104 mothers of children with DS and 121 normal women who had children with no genetic problems. We conducted an interview and compared their mean age at menopause.

Results: We did not detect a statistically significant difference in mean age at menopause. When we stratified into women who had conceived when younger or older than 35 years of age, we found a statistically significant difference only for women who had conceived at the age of 35 years or older. We observed three cases of previous unilateral ovarian surgery in the study group and one case in the control group.

Conclusions: We cannot conclude that mothers of children with DS will have precocious menopause. Nevertheless, our findings do not exclude the theory of reduced ovarian reserve as a primordial factor in the genesis of DS.

Keywords: Down syndrome, menopause, oophorectomy, ovarian reserve

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (57.2 KB).

References

  • 1.Saenz RB. Primary care of infants and young children with Down Syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 1999;59:392–395. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Newberger DS. Down Syndrome: Prenatal risk assessment and diagnosis. Am Fam Physician. 2000;62:825–838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jorde LB, Carey JC, White RL. Clinical cytogenetics: The chromosome basis of human disease. In: Jorde LB, Carey JC, White RL, editors. Medical Genetics. St. Louis: Mosby; 1995. p. 102. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Warburton D. The effect of maternal age on the frequency of trisomy: change in meiosis or in utero selection? In: Hassold TJ, Epstein CJ, editors. Molecular and Cytogenetic Studies of Non-disjunction. New York: Liss; 1989. pp. 165–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Little BB, Ramin SM, Cambridge BS, Schneider NR, Cohen DS, Snell LM, Harrod MJ, Johnston WL. Risk of chromosomal abnormalities with emphasis on liveborn in offspring of very young mothers. Am J Hum Genet. 1995;57:1178. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Palomaki GE, Haddow JE. Age-related prevalence of Down Syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:1597–1598. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70063-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hook EB, Cross PK, Jackson L, Pergament E, Brambati B. Maternal age specific rates of 47, +21 and other cytogenetic abnormalities diagnosed in the first trimester of pregnancy in chorionic villus biopsy specimens: Comparison with rates expected from observations at amniocentesis. Am J Hum Genet. 1988;42:797–807. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Machintosh MC, Wald NJ, Chard T, Hansen J, Mikkelsen M, Therkelsen AJ, Petersen GB, Lundsteen C. Selective miscarriage of Down’s Syndrome fetuses in women aged 35 years and older. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102:798. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10845.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lamb NE, Freeman SB, Savage-Austin A, Pettay D, Taft L, Hersey J, Gu Y, Shen J, Saker D, May KM, Avramopoulos D, Petersen MB, Hallberg A, Mikkelsen M, Hassold TJ, Sherman SL. Susceptible chiasmata configurations of chromosome 21 predispose to non-disjunction in both maternal meiosis I and meiosis II. Nat Genet. 1996;14:400–405. doi: 10.1038/ng1296-400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sokol AI, Kramer RL, Yaron Y, O’Brien JE, Muller F, Johnson MP, Evans MI. Age-specific variation in aneuploidy incidence among biochemical screening programs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;170:971–973. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70199-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kline J, Kinney A, Levin B, Warburton D. Trisomic pregnancy and earlier age at menopause. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;67:395–404. doi: 10.1086/303009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Freeman SB, Yang Q, Allran K, Sherman SL. Women with a reduced ovarian complement may have an increased risk for a child with Down Syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:1680–1683. doi: 10.1086/302907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Salamanca-Gómez F. Ribosomal RNA, maternal age and Down’s Syndrome. Acta Genet Med Gemellol. 1975;24:245–250. doi: 10.1017/s0001566000010357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Salamanca-Gomez F, Buentello L, Salamanca-Buentello F. Reduced ovarian complement, premature ovarian failure and Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 2001;99:168–169. doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(2000)9999:999<00::aid-ajmg1131>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Van Montfrans JM, Lambalk CB, Van Hooff MH, Van Vugt JM. Are elevated FSH concentrations in the pre-conceptional period a risk factor for Downás syndrome pregnancies? Hum Reprod. 2001;1:1270–1273. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.6.1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nasseri A, Mukherjee T, Grifo JA, Noyes N, Krey L, Coperman AB. Elevated day 3 serum follicle stimulating hormone and/or estradiol may predict fetal aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:715–718. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00525-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Van Montfrans JM, Dorland M, Oosterhuis GJ, Van Vugt JM. Increased concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone in mothers of children with Downás Syndrome. Lancet. 1999;353:1853–1854. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)00936-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kato I, Toniolo P, Akhmedkhanov A, Koenig K, Shore R, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A. Prospective study of factors influencing the onset of natural menopause. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1271–1276. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00119-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Meschia M, Pansini F, Modena AB, De Aloysio D, Gambacciani M, Parazzini F, Campagnoli C, Maiocchi G, Peruzzi E. Determinants of age at menopause in Italy: results from a large cross-section study. Maturitas. 2000;34:119–125. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(99)00095-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Anasti JN. Premature ovarian failure: an update. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:1–15. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00099-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES