Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 2004 Jun;21(6):217–222. doi: 10.1023/B:JARG.0000040237.47026.0f

Reduced Senescence and Retained Nuclear DNA Integrity in Human Spermatozoa Prepared by Density Gradient Centrifugation

J M Morrell 1,✉, O Moffatt 2, D Sakkas 3, G C Manicardi 4, D Bizzaro 4, M Tomlinson 2, H Nilsson 1, P V Holmes 1
PMCID: PMC3455231  PMID: 15526977

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether removal of extraneous cells and immotile spermatozoa from a sperm preparation by density gradient centrifugation could help to maintain normal spermatozoa in a viable state and retain their deoxyribonucleic acid integrity.

Methods: Sperm motility was assessed on a daily basis in aliquots of neat semen, extended semen, and spermatozoa prepared on a PureSperm® density gradient. At the same time, aliquots of each sperm sample were preserved for TUNEL assay and nick translation.

Results: Spermatozoa prepared using density gradient centrifugation survived three times as long as spermatozoa in neat semen or in extended semen. Both deoxyribonucleic acid integrity and sperm motility were retained in the gradient preparations.

Conclusions: Preparing spermatozoa by density gradient centrifugation is advantageous in prolonging sperm survival and maintaining deoxyribonucleic acid integrity, presumably by removing sources of reactive oxygen species. Stored spermatozoa could be used for a second attempt at fertilization if oocyte immaturity was suspected.

Keywords: Oocyte immaturity, PureSperm, reduced senescence, sperm DNA integrity

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (84.9 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Akhondi MA, Chapple C, Moore HD. Prolonged survival of human spermatozoa when co-incubated with epididymal cell cultures. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:514–522. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.3.514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Estop AM, Munne S, Jost LK, Evenson DP. Studies on sperm chromatin structure alterations and cytogenetic damage of mouse sperm following in vitro incubation. Studies on in vitroincubated mouse sperm. J Androl. 1993;14:282–288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Evenson DP, Darzynklewicz Z, Melamed MR. Relation of mammalian sperm chromatin heterogenity to fertility. Science. 1980;210:1131–1133. doi: 10.1126/science.7444440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Trasler JM, Hales BF, Robaire B. Paternal cyclophosphamide treatment of rats causes fetal loss and malformations without affecting male fertility. Nature. 1985;316:144–146. doi: 10.1038/316144a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Qui J, Hales BF, Robaire B. Effects of chronic low-dose cyclophosphamide exposure on the nuclei of rat spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 1995;52:33–40. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod52.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sakkas D, Urner F, Blanchi PG, Bizzaro D, Wagnre I, Jaquenoud N, Manicardi G, Campana A. Sperm chromatin anomalies can influence decondensation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:837–843. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lopes S, Sun JG, Jurisicova A, Meriano J, Casper RF. Sperm deoxyribo-nucleic acid fragmentation is increased in poor-quality semen samples and correlates with failed fertilization in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:528–532. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00536-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Campana A, Sakkas D. Blastocyst development from supernumerary embryos after intracytoplasmic sperm injection:A paternal influence? Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1632–1637. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D, Zinaman MJ, Clegg E, Purvis K, de Angelis P, Claussen OP. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1039–1049. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.4.1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Spano M, Bonde JP, Hjollund HI, Kolstad HA, Cordelli E, Leter G. Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. Danish First Pregnancy Planner Study Team. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:43–50. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00462-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Donnelly D, McClure N, Trinder S, Lewis SEM. Spermatozoal DNA integrity: Correlation with fertilization and pregnancy rates in IVF and ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1552–1561. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.7.1552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tomlinson MJ, Moffat O, Manicardi GC, Bizzaro D, Sakkas D: Sperm morphology and nuclear DNA integrity after density gradient centrifugation (DGC) through PureSperm®: Relationship to IVF outcome. J Androl Suppl 2001;100
  • 13.Aitken RJ, Clarkson JS. Significance of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in defining the efficacy of sperm preparation techniques. J Androl. 1988;9:367–376. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1988.tb01067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aitken RJ, West KM. Analysis of the relationship between reactive oxygen species production and leukocyte infiltration in fractions of human semen separated by percoll gradients. Int J Androl. 1990;3:433–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1990.tb01051.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Aitken RJ, Buckingham DW, West K, Wu FC, Zikopoulos K, Richardson DW. On the contribution of leukocytes and spermatozoa to the high levels of reactive oxygen species recorded in the ejaculates of oligozoospermic patients. J Reprod Fert. 1992;94:451–462. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0940451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kessopoulou E, Tomlinson M, Barratt CL, Bolton AE, Cooke IL. Origin of reactive oxygen species in human semen: Spermatozoa or leukocytes? J Reprod Fert. 1992;94:463–470. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0940463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zimmerman ER, Robertson KR, Kim H, Drobnis EZ, Nakajima ST. Semen preparation with the Sperm Select system versus a washing technique. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:269–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sőderlund B, Lundin K. The use of silane-coated silica particles for density gradient centrifugation in in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:857–860. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.4.857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Balaban B, Lundin K, Morrell JM, Tjellstrőm H, Urman B, Holmes PV. An alternative to PVP for slowing sperm prior to ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1887–1889. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gorczyca W, Traganos F, Jesionowska H, Darzynkiewicz Z. Presence of DNA strand breaks and increased sensitivity of DNA in situ to denaturation in abnormal human sperm cells: Analogy to apoptosis of somatic cells. Exp Cell Res. 1993;207:202–205. doi: 10.1006/excr.1993.1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Manicardi GC, Bianchi PG, Pantano S, Azzoni P, Bizzaro D, Bianchi U, Sakkas D. Presence of endogenous nicks in DNA of ejaculated human spermatozoa and its relationship to chromomycin A3 accessibility. Biol Reprod. 1995;52:864–867. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod52.4.864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Manicardi GC, Tombaco A, Bizzaro D, Bianchi U, Bianchi PG, Sakkas D. DNA strand breaks in ejaculated human spermatozoa: Comparison of susceptibility to the nick translation and terminal transferase assays. Hist J. 1998;30:33–39. doi: 10.1023/A:1003214529185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Campbell RC. Statistics for Biologists. 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1974. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sakkas D, Manicardi GC, Tomlinson M, Mandriolo M, Bizzaro D, Bianchi PG, Bianchi U. The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim-up method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1112–1116. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.5.1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sun JG, Juriscova A, Casper RF. Detection of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in human sperm; correlation with fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod. 1997;56:602–607. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod56.3.602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Beckman KB, Ames BN. Oxidative decay of DNA. J BiolChem. 1997;272:19633–19636. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.32.19633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aitken RJ, Buckingham DW, Brindle J, Gomez E, Baker HWG, Irvine DS. Analysis of sperm movement in relation to the oxidative stress created by leukocytes in washed sperm preparations and seminal plasma. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2061–2071. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Agarwal A, Shekarriz M, Sidhu RK, Thomas AJ. Value of clinical diagnosis in predicting the quality of cryopreserved sperm from cancer patients. J Urol. 1996;155:934–938. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199603000-00038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mortimer D. Sperm Preparation Methods. J Androl. 2000;21:357–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kovanci F, Kovacs T, Moretti E, Vigue L, Bray-Ward P, Ward DC, Huszar G. FISH assessment of aneuploidy frequencies in mature and immature human spermatozoa classified by the absence or presence of cytoplasmic retention. Hum Rep. 2001;16:1209–1217. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.6.1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Griveau JF, LeLannou D. Reactive oxygen species and human spermatozoa Physiology and pathology. Int J Androl. 1997;20:61–69. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.1997.00044.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ermilov A, Diamond MP, Sacco AG, Dozortsev DD. Culture media and their components differ in their ability to scavenge reactive oxygen species in the plasmid relaxation assay. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:154–157. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00204-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ranganathan P, Agarwal A: PureSperm is superior to ISolate density gradient for sperm processing. J Androl Suppl 2001;115
  • 34.Evenson DP, Larson KL, Jost LK. The Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA): Clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation related to male infertility and comparison with other techniques. J Androl. 2002;23:25–43. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2002.tb02599.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sega GA, Stomayor RE, Owens JGA. Study of unscheduled DNA synthesis induced by X-rays in the germ cells of male mice. Mutat Res. 1978;49:239–257. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(78)90163-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Brandriff B, Pederson RA. Repair of the ultraviolet-irradiated male genome in fertilized mouse eggs. Science. 1981;211:1431–1433. doi: 10.1126/science.7466400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Matsuda Y, Tobari I. Chromosomal analysis in mouse eggs fertilized in vitro with sperm exposed to ultraviolet light (UV) and methyl and ethyl methanesulfonate (MMS and EMS) Mutat Res. 1988;198:131–144. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(88)90048-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ahmedi A, Ng SC. Fertilizing ability of DNA-damaged spermatozoa. J Exp Zool. 1999;284:696–704. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19991101)284:6<696::AID-JEZ11>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ramos L, Wetzels AMM. Low rates of DNA fragmentation in selected motile human spermatozoa assessed by the TUNEL assay. Hum Rep. 2001;16:1703–1707. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.8.1703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zini A, Mak V, Phang D, Jarvi K. Potential adverse effect of semen processing on human sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:496–499. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00295-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zini A, Nam RK, Mak V, Phang D, Jarvi K. Influence of initial semen quality on the integrity of human sperm DNA following semen processing. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:824–827. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01495-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES