Abstract
The changes in visco-elastic properties of skin belong to the most conspicuous manifestations of cutaneous aging. In spite of apparent simplicity, the measurement of mechanical parameters of skin in vivo presents both theoretical and practical problems. Reproducibility, standardization, duration of measurement, discomfort for experimental subjects are the main complications. Measurement and analysis of transient deformation response to pressure stress provides theoretically consistent and practically applicable methodology.
Experiment: The transient deformation response of skin was measured in two groups consisting of 15 healthy men and 17 healthy women. The range of age interval was 20 to 58 years. The deformation response was measured as reaction of skin on sudden change of pressure stress between two levels of loading on skin surface.
Results: Transient response of human skin consists of sum of two exponential curves. A “rapid” exponential curve has time constant typically of order 10 ms, while “slow” exponential curve has a time constant of order 0.1 to 1s. Both time constants increase with chronological age. Time for drop of deformation on 12.5% of full deformation proved to be a simple and sensitive criterion of skin aging, with strong correlation with chronological age.
Main advantage of the method: Measurement is quantitative and reproducible. Procedure is easy to repeat. Its average duration is approx. 2 minutes and it does not represent any discomfort for test subjects.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (240.2 KB).
References
- 1.Hollingsworth J.W., Jablon S. Correlation between tests in Hiroshima subjects-an attempt to define “physiological age”. Yale J. Biol. Med. 1965;33:11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dean W. Biological Aging Measurement. Los Angeles: The Center for Biogerontology; 1988. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Balin K. Practical handbook of human biological age determination. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bulpitt C.J., Shipley M.J., Brought O.N., et al. The Assessment of biological age — a report from the Department of environmental study. Aging-clinical and experimental research. 1994;6(3):181–191. doi: 10.1007/BF03324236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Doubal, S., Klemera P: Biophysical methods of biological age assessment. In: E. Kukurová. (ed.): Advances in Medical Physics. Bratislava, Malé centrum, 115–117, 1997.
- 6.Giacomoni P.U., Declereq L., Hellemans L., Maes D. Aging of human skin: Review of a mechanistic model and first experimental data. IUBMB Life. 2000;49(4):259–263. doi: 10.1080/15216540050033104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Doubal S. Apparatus for measurement of mechanical properties of solids and visco-elastic bodies. Folia Farm. Univ. Carol. 2000;XXV:45–48. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Doubal S. Visco-elastic parameters of biological materials — measurement and analysis of creep curves. Folia Pharm. Univ. Carol. 2000;XXV:35–43. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Christensen M.S., Hargens C.W., S. Nacht S.B., Gans E.H. Viscoelastic properties of intact human skin: instrumentation, hydration effects and the contribution of the stratum corneum. J. Invest. Derm. 1977;69:282–286. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12507500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]