Abstract
Purpose: A mouse model of unilateral oviductal obstruction was designed to study whether healthy oviducts can support embryo development in an advanced stage toward blastocyst hatching and implantation when the embryos in the contralateral side normally move into the uterine cavity.
Methods: The oviducts of 80 female ICR mice (aged 5–8 weeks) were ligated unilaterally 12–40 hr postcoitus. The ligated oviducts were isolated from day 4 to 19.5 postcoitus. Embryos within the ligated oviducts were then flushed out to record the developmental stage and compared with the conceptuses in the contralateral uterine horns with unligated oviducts. Embryos recovered from ligated oviducts were then cultured in vitro to observe their potential for further development.
Results: In 33 mice, 53.4% (163/305) and 86.1% (241/280) of the morphologically normal blastocysts had hatched from the zona pellucida within the obstructed tube and contralateral uterine horns, respectively, on the 5th day postcoitus. The data demonstrated that the hatching process could take place within the obstructed fallopian tube, but the timing was delayed. From 5.5 to 19.5 days postcoitus, a total of 362 implanted embryos were obtained in unligated control uterine horns, but none of the 404 embryos in the artificially obstructed oviducts were implanted. The embryos within the ligated tubes were dormant in the hatched blastocyst stage as demonstrated by their ability to continue growing (98.2%) when removed from the oviduct to an in vitro environment.
Conclusions: In this study, we demonstrate that mouse embryos can hatch, although delayed, in obstructed healthy oviducts. Tubal pregnancy is not likely to happen in artificially obstructed healthy mouse fallopian tubes, since all the viable embryos were dormant at the hatched blastocyst stage.
Keywords: obstructed oviduct, hatching, embryonic dormancy
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (57.3 KB).
REFERENCES
- 1.Harper MJK. Sperm and egg transport. In: Austin CR, Short RV, editors. Reproduction in Mammals I. Germ Cells and Fertilization. 2nd ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1982. pp. 102–127. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Buhi WC, O'Brien B, Alvarez IM, Erdos G, Dubois D. Immunogold localization of porcine oviductal secretary proteins within the zona pellucida, perivitelline space, and plasmamembrane of oviductal and uterine oocytes and early embryos. Biol Reprod. 1993;48:1274–1283. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod48.6.1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bolton VN, Hawes SM, Taylor CT, Parsons JH. Development of spare human preimplantation embryos in vitro: An analysis of the correlations among gross morphology, cleavage rates, and development to the blastocyst. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transf. 1989;6:30–35. doi: 10.1007/BF01134578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kiessling AA, Davis HW, Williams CS, Sauter RW, Harrison LW. Development and DNA polymerase activities in cultured preimplantation mouse embryos: Comparison with embryos developed in vivo. J Exp Zool. 1991;258:34–47. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402580105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vlad M, Walker D, Kennedy RC. Nuclei number in human embryos co-cultured with human ampullary cells. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1678–1686. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Confino E, Rawlins R, Binor Z, Radwanska E. The effect of the oviduct, uterine, and in vitro environments on zona thinning in the mouse embryo. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:164–167. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81495-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McLaren A. A study of blastocysts during delay and subsequent implantation in lactating mice. J Endocr. 1968;42:453–463. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0420453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Aitken RJ. Changes in the protein content of mouse uterine flushings during normal pregnancy and delayed implantation, and after ovariectomy and oestradiol administration. J Reprod Fertil. 1977;50:29–36. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0500029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Finn CA, Martin L. The control of implantation. J Reprod Fertil. 1974;39:195–206. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0390195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McLaren A, et al. Blastocyst activation. In: Segal SJ, Crozier R, Corfman PA, et al., editors. The Regulation of Mammalian Reproduction. Springfield, IL: Thomas; 1973. pp. 321–328. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Psychoyos A: Endocrine control of egg implantation. In Handbook of Physiology, Section 7, Vol. 11, Part 2, Greep RO, Astwood EB (eds). 1973; pp 201-256
- 12.Aitken RJ. The culture of mouse blastocyst in the presence of uterine flushings collected during normal pregnancy, delayed implantation and pro-oestrus. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1977;41:295–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.O'Neill C, Quinn P. Inhibitory influence of uterine secretions on mouse blastocysts decreases at the time of blastocyst activation. J Reprod Fertil. 1983;68:269–274. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0680269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Finn CA, Downie JM. Changes in the endometrium of mice after the induction of implantation by actinomycin D. J Endocrinol. 1975;65:259–264. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0650259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Camus M, Lejeune B, Leroy F. Induction of implantation in the rat by intraparametrial injection of actinomycin D. Biol Reprod. 1979;20:1115–1118. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod20.5.1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Katagiri S, Yuen BH, Moon YS, Takahashi Y, Kanagawa H. Separation of a 170-K delayed-implantation-associated protein with inhibitory activity on trophoblast outgrowth and RNA synthesis by mouse embryo. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1994;31:141–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1994.tb00859.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Katagiri S, Takahashi Y, Kanagawa H, Yuen BH, Moon YS. A delayed-implantation-associated protein prevents resumption ofDNAsynthesis by the trophectoderm of delayed-implanting mouse blastocysts in vitro. J Vet Med Sci. 1998;60:791–794. doi: 10.1292/jvms.60.791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Adams CE. Egg development in the rabbit: the influence of postcoital ligation of the uterine tube and of ovariectomy. J Endocrinol. 1958;42:453–463. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0160283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Murray FA, Jr, Bazer FW, Rundell JW, Vingent CK, Wallace HD, Warnick AG. Developmental failure of swine embryos restricted to the oviduct environment. J Reprod Fertil. 1971;24:445–448. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0240445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pauerstein CJ, Eddy CA, Koong MK, Moore GD. Rabbit endosalpinx suppresses ectopic implantation. Fertil Steril. 1990;54:522–526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moore GD, Eddy CA, Pauerstein CJ. Rabbit endosalpinx inhibits implantation in vitro. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:902–907. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]