Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the sex ratio in births conceived with blastocyst transfer compared to day 3-ET.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of IVF patients who became pregnant after blastocyst or cleavage stage transfer at Stanford University Hospital and a literature review were performed.
Result(s): In the day 3-ET group, the male-to-female (M/F) ratio was 157/139 (53%/47%) compared to 97/66 (59.5%/40.5%) in the blastocyst group (P = 0.18). Similar trends have been found in individual studies in the literature but reached statistical significance in only one out of six reports reviewed. The combined data from our study and the literature show a male-to-female ratio of 797/594 (57.3%/42.7%) in blastocyst transfer compared to 977/932 (51.2%/48.8%) in day 3-ET (P = 0.001).
Conclusion(s): Although individual studies may lack power to show an altered sex ratio with blastocyst transfer, the combined data presented in this report do suggest that the M/F ratio is higher with blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage stage transfer.
Keywords: Blastocyst transfer, cleavage stage transfer, IVF, sex ratio
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (53.4 KB).
References
- 1.Avery B, Madison V, Greve T. Sex and development in bovine in-vitro fertilized embryos. Theriogenology. 1991;35:953–963. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(91)90306-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pegoraro LM, Thuard JM, Delalleau N, Guerin B, Deschamps JC, Marquant L., Guienne B, Humblot P. Comparison of sexratio and cell number of IVM-IVF bovine blastocystsco-cultured with bovine oviduct epithelial cells or with Vero cells. Theriogenology. 1998;49:1579–1590. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(98)00103-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Valdivia RPA, Kunieda T, Azuma S, Toyoda Y. PCR sexing and developmental rate differences in preimplantation mouse embryos fertilized and cultured in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev. 1993;35:121–126. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080350204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cassar G, King WA, King GJ. Influence of sex on early growth of pig conceptuses. J Reprod Fertil. 1994;101:317–320. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1010317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pergament E, Fiddler M, Cho N, Johnson D, Holmgren WJ. Sexual differentiation and preimplantation cell growth. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1730–1732. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tarin JJ, Bernabeu R, Baviera A, Bonada M, Cano A. Sexselection may be inadvertently performed in in-vitro fertilization–embryo transfer programmes. Hum Reprod. 1995;11:2992–2998. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Menezo YJR, Chouteau J, Torello MJ, Girard A, Veiga A. Birth weight and sex ratio after transfer at the blastocyst stage in humans. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:221–224. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00256-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kausche A, Jones GM, Trounson AO, Figueiredo F, MacLachlan V, Lolatgis N. Sex ratio and birth weights of infants born as a result of blastocyst transfer compared with early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:688–693. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wilson M, Hartke K, Kiehl M, Rodgers J, Brabec C, Lyles R. Integration of blastocyst transfer for all patients. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:693–696. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)03235-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wilson M: Extended embryo culture and blastocyst freezing—The art and the science. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual IVF-ET, Santa Barbara, CA, 2001, pp. 243-276
- 11.Meintjes M, Crider-Pirkle SS, Ward DC, Rodriguez JA, Chantilis SJ, Madden JD. Sex ratio and birthweight outcome when considering blastocyst expansion, multiple gestation, and facility. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(3):S147. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rodriguez HF, Bustillo M, LaPalme J, Riley E, Eisermann J, Thompson K. Clinical outcomes with transfer of blastocyst or cleavage stage embryos: High order pregnancies, newborn weights and sex ratio. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(3):S170. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Anderson M, Graham J, Tucker M, Krecko T, Levy MJ, Widra E. Comparison of gender and birth weight following day-three and blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(3):S179. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mercader A, Gamiz P, de los Santos M, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C. Sex ratio after day 2, day 3 or blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(3):S261. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ray PF, Conaghan J, Winston RM, Handyside AH. Increased number of cells and metabolic activity in male human preimplantation embryos following in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Fertil. 1995;104:165–171. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1040165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ng E, Claman P, Leveille MC, Tanphaichitr N, Compitak K, Suwajanakorn S, Wells G. Sex ratio of babies is unchanged after transfer of fast-versus slow-cleaving embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12:566–568. doi: 10.1007/BF02212575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Lejeune V, Volante M, Frydman R. Female and male human embryo growth rates are similar before the eight-cell stage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:45–49. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70624-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Milki AA, Fisch JD, Behr B. Two-blastocyst transfer has similar pregnancy rates and a decreased multiple gestation rate compared with three-blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:225–228. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00262-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Milki AA, Hinckley MD, Fisch JD, Dasig D, Behr B. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with day 3 embryo transfer in similar patient populations. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:126–109. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00485-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Milki AA, Hinckley MD, Gebhardt J, Dasig D, Westphal LM, Behr B. Accuracy of day 3 criteria for selecting the best embryos. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:1191–1195. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03104-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]