Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 2001 Oct;18(10):534–538. doi: 10.1023/A:1011991806423

Clinical Assisted Reproduction: Cryopreservation of Human Cumulus Cells for Co-cultures and Assessment of DNA Damage After Thawing Using the Comet Assay

Elisa M Lindley 1, John D Jacobson 1, Johannah Corselli 1, Alan King 1, Philip J Chan 1,2
PMCID: PMC3455319  PMID: 11699124

Abstract

Purpose: Cumulus cells have been shown to be beneficial for blastocysts formation in co-cultures but information on cumulus cryopreservation is lacking. The objective was to use the fixed cell comet assay to analyze for DNA damage in cumulus cells after cryopreservation.

Methods: Discarded cumulus cells from follicular aspirates obtained during assisted reproduction procedures (N = 4 cases) were pooled and cryopreserved in either 40% ethylene glycol and 0.5 M sucrose, 12:20% glycerol-egg yolk medium, 28% glycerol hypoosmolar medium or control medium. The cells were processed and stored in liquid nitrogen for 48 h. The thawed cells were smeared on glass slides, fixed, stained with acridine orange, embedded in a mini-agarose layer, and electrophoresis carried out. Fluorescent images were analyzed.

Results: The cumulus tail moment, a calculated index of DNA damage, was significantly lower for each of the three cryoprotectant when compared with the control. The two cryoprotectants containing glycerol were associated with higher cumulus cell viability. However, the glycerol-egg yolk combination yielded the highest cell viability.

Conclusions: The cumulus comet assay demonstrated similar DNA integrity in cells frozen in each of the three cryoprotectants. The glycerol-egg yolk medium had the highest cell viability with little or no DNA damage after freeze-thaw. More studies are needed to examine the long-term effect of the cryoprotectants on thawed cumulus cell viability.

Keywords: apoptosis, comet assay, cumulus granulosa, single cell gel electrophoresis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (245.4 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Abbass AM. Coculture of human pronuclear oocytes with their cumulus cells. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1727–1729. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Quinn P, Margalit R. Beneficial effects of coculture with cumulus cells on blastocyst formation in a prospective trial with supernumerary human embryos. J Assist Reprod Genetics. 1996;13:9–14. doi: 10.1007/BF02068862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eppic J, O'Brien M, Wigglesworth K. Mammalian oocyte growth and development in vitro. Mol Reprod Develop. 1996;44:260–273. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199606)44:2<260::AID-MRD17>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Perez GI, Tilly JL. Cumulus cells are required for the increased apoptotic potential in oocytes of aged mice. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2781–2783. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.12.2781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stewart DR, Vandevoort CA. Relaxin secretion by human granulosa cell culture is predictive of in-vitro fertilizationembryo transfer success. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:338–344. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.2.338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kato Y, Tani T, Tsunoda Y. Cloning of calves from various somatic cell types of male and female adult, newborn and fetal cows. J Reprod Fertil. 2000;120:231–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Östling O, Johanson KJ. Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984;123:291–298. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(84)90411-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Singh NP, Danner DB, Tice RR, McCoy MT, Collins GD, Schneider EL. Abundant alkali sensitive sites in DNA of human and mouse sperm. Exp Cell Res. 1989;184:461–470. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(89)90344-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Edwards RG, Brody SA. Evaluation and treatment of the infertile woman. In: Edwards RG, Brody SA, editors. Principles and Practice of Assisted Human Reproduction. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1996. pp. 150–301. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eliasson R, Treschl L. Supravital staining of human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril. 1971;22:134–137. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)38049-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Isachenko EF, Nayudu PL. Vitrification of mouse germinal vesicle oocytes: Effect of treatment temperature and egg yolk on chromatin and spindle normality and cumulus integrity. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:400–408. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.2.400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Raman RS, Chan PJ, Corselli JU, Patton WC, Jacobson JD, Chan SR, King A. Comet assay of cumulus cell DNA status and the relationship to oocyte fertilization via intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:831–835. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tejada RI, Mitchell JC, Norman A, Marik JJ, Friedman S. A test for the practical evaluation of male fertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. Fertil Steril. 1984;42:87–91. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47963-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chan PJ, Corselli JU, Patton WC, Jacobson JD, Chan SR, King A. A simple comet assay for archived sperm correlates DNA fragmentation to reduced hyperactivation and penetration of zona-free hamster oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:1–7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01655-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kent CR, Eady JJ, Ross GM, Steel GG. The comet moment as a measure of DNA damage in the comet assay. Int J Radiat Biol. 1995;67:655–660. doi: 10.1080/09553009514550771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fairbairn DW, Olive PL, O'Neill KL. The comet assay: A comprehensive review. Mutat Res. 1995;339:37–59. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(94)00013-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bautista JA, Kanagawa H. Current status of vitrification of embryos and oocytes in domestic animals: Ethylene glycol as an emerging cryoprotectant of choice. Jpn J Vet Res. 1998;45:183–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sztein JM, O'Brien MJ, Farley JS, Mobraaten LE, Eppic JJ. Rescue of oocytes from antral follicles of cryopreserved mouse ovaries: Competence to undergo maturation, embryogenesis, and development to term. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:567–571. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.3.567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Collins AR, Dobson VL, Dušinská M, Kennedy G, Štetina R. The comet assay: What can it really tell us? Mutat Res. 1997;375:183–193. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(97)00013-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McKelvey-Martin VJ, Green MHL, Schmezer P, Pool-Zobel BL, De Meo MP, Collins A. The single cell gel electrophoresis assay (comet assay): A European review. Mutat Res. 1993;288:47–63. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(93)90207-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kizilian N, Wilkins RC, Reinhardt P, Ferrarotto C, McLean JRN, McNamee JP. Silver-stained comet assay for detection of apoptosis. Biotechniques. 1999;27:926–930. doi: 10.2144/99275bm10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES