Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess first embryo cleavage (FEC) 25–27 h after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) as a parameter for the embryo selection process.
Methods: From January 1998 to December 1999, a total of 670 patients were subjected to the ICSI programme at the Centre for Human Reproduction, Sinh´ Junqueira Maternity Foundation, and the FEC parameter was evaluated in three situations.
Results: In the first, a total of 300 zygotes were analyzed on the basis of a score (16–18 h after ICSI) and observed for the presence or absence of FEC (25–27 h after ICSI). A significant (p < 0.02) presence of FEC was observed in zygotes with a score of 15 (ideal score). In the second, a total of 200 patients were selected and divided into two groups matched for age and laboratory performance. Group I (n = 100) was subjected to transfer of embryos with the absence of FEC only (since in this cycle no embryos with FEC were detected within 25–27 h after ICSI) and Group II (n = 100) was subjected to transfer of embryos with the presence of FEC only. The age of Group I patients (33.8 ± 4.2 years) did not differ significantly (p = 0.50) from that of Group II patients (33.5 ± 4.3 years). The number of embryos transferred was similar (p = 0.07) for Group I (2.7 ± 1.1) and Group II (2.9 ± 0.88). In Group II, the 17.5% implantation rate was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than the 5.9% rate obtained for Group I. The pregnancy rate for Group II was significantly higher (p < 0.01) (33%) than that for Group I (12%). The incidence of abortion was 16.6% in Group I as compared with 6% in Group II. In the third situation, we observed the frequency of embryos with FEC in 36 patients whose implantation rate was 100% (ideal result) and obtained a value of 82%.
Conclusions: The data suggest that the presence of the FEC parameter that was evaluated 25–27 h after ICSI could be used to select embryos with a higher implantation power. The data reported here may justify routine analysis of embryos with FEC for the process of embryo selection after ICSI.
Keywords: Embryo selection, first cleavage, ICSI, implantation rate, pregnancy
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (51.1 KB).
REFERENCES
- 1.Gardner DK, Schoolcraft W, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:3434–3440. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Erenus M, Zouves C, Rajamahendran P, Leung S, Fluker M, Gomel V. The effect of embryo quality on subsequent pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:707–710. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54603-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kodama H, Fukuda J, Karube H, Matsui T, Shimizu Y, Tasdemir M, Tasdemir I, Tanaka T. Prospective evaluation of simple morphological criteria for embryo selection in double embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2999–3003. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Edwards RG, Fishel SB, Cohen J. Factors influencing the success of in vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transf. 1984;1:3–23. doi: 10.1007/BF01129615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Testart J. Cleavage stage of human embryos two days after fertilization in vitro and their development ability after transfer into the uterus. Hum Reprod. 1986;1:29–31. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lewin A, Schenker JG, Safran A, Zigelman N, Avrech O, Abramov Y, Friedler S, Reubinoff BE. Embryo growth rate in vitro as an indicator of embryo quality in IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1994;11:500–503. doi: 10.1007/BF02216029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cummins JM, Breen TM, Harrison KL. A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: Its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transf. 1986;3:284–295. doi: 10.1007/BF01133388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Puissant F, Van Rysselberge M, Barlow P, Deweze J, Leroy F. Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 1987;2:705–708. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Steer CV, Mills CL, Tan SL, Campbell S, Edwards RG. The cumulative embryo score: A predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:117–119. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shoukir Y, Campana A, Farley T, Sakkas D. Early cleavage of in-vitro fertilized human embryos to the 2-cell stage: A novel indicator of embryo quality and viability. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1531–1536. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.7.1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sakkas D, Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Bianchi PG, Campana A. Early cleavage of human embryos to the two-cell stage after intracytoplasmic sperm injection as an indicator of embryo viability. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:182–187. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.1.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Scott LA, Smith S. The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1003–1013. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.4.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Svalander P, Forsberg AS, Jakobsson AH, Wikland M. Factors of importance for the establishment of a successful programme of intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:828–837. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57489-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ludwig M, Schöpper B, Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K. Clinical use of a pronuclear stage score following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Impact on pregnancy rates under the conditions of the German embryo protection law. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:325–329. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.2.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhu J, Meniru GI, Craft IL. Embryo developmental stage at transfer influences outcome of treatment with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14:245–249. doi: 10.1007/BF02765824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ziebe S, Petersen K, Lindenberg S, Andersen AG, Gabrielsen A, Andersen AN. Embryo morphology or cleavage stage: How to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1545–1549. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.7.1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pelinck MJ, De Vos M, Dekens M, Van der E. J., De Sutter P, Dhont M. Embryos cultured in vitro with multinucleated blastomeres have poor implantation potential in human in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:960–963. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.4.960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ebner T, Yaman C, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Feichtinger O, Tews G. Prognostic value of first polar body morphology on fertilization rate and embryo quality in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:427–430. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.2.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]