Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (283.9 KB).
REFERENCES
- 1.Soussis I, Harper JC, Handyside AH, Winston RML. Obstetric outcome of pregnancies resulting from embryos biopsied for pre-implantation diagnosis of inherited disease. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:784–788. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09874.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Handyside AH, Kontogianni E, Hardy K, Winston RML. Pregnancies from human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature. 1990;344:768–770. doi: 10.1038/344768a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Handyside AH, Delhanty JDA. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: strategies and surprises. Trends Genet. 1997;13:270–275. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(97)01166-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fugger EF, Black SH, Keyvanfar K, Schulman JD. Births of normal daughters after MicroSort sperm separation and intrauterine insemination, in-vitro fertilization, or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2367–2370. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.9.2367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pennings G. Family balancing as a morally acceptable application of sex selection. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2339–2345. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liu P, Rose GA. Sex selection: The right way forward. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2343–2345. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dawson K, Trounson A. Ethics of sex selection for family balancing—Why balance families? Hum Reprod. 1996;12:2577–2578. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Glover J. Comments on some ethical issues in sex selection. In: Sureau C, Shenfeld F, editors. Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1995. pp. 305–313. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu P, Rose GA. Social aspects of >800 couples coming forward for gender selection of their children. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:968–971. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Egozcue J. Sex selection: Why not? Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1777. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Siebel MM, Glazier S, Zilberstein M. Gender distribution—not sex selection. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:569–570. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Weiss R. Human cloning research will be regulated: FDA decides it has statutory authority. Washington Post. 1998;20:A1. [Google Scholar]
- 13.McGregor A. Swiss go to polls over genetic manipulation. Lancet. 1998;351:1713. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zinkernagel RM. Gene technology and democracy. Science. 1997;278:1207. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5341.1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]