Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 1999 Nov;16(10):540–545. doi: 10.1023/A:1020501305235

Relationship Between the Sperm Motility Index Assessed by the Sperm Quality Analyzer and the Outcome of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

Hiroaki Shibahara 1, Yukari Hamada 1, Akiko Hasegawa 1, Eiko Wakimoto 1, Hideaki Toji 1, Minoru Shigeta 1, Koji Koyama 1,✉
PMCID: PMC3455380  PMID: 10575583

Abstract

Purpose:Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been validated as a useful treatment in severe male-factor patients who could not achieve fertilization and live births by conventional in vitro fertilization treatment. To examine the impact of male factors on ICSI outcome, clinical laboratory data were retrospectively analyzed.

Methods:One hundred two cycles of ICSI treatment indicated by severe male-factor infertility were entered into this study. Sperm parameters including sperm motility, sperm concentration, and sperm motility index assessed by the Sperm Quality Analyzer were evaluated.

Results:Five hundred seventy-six metaphase II oocytes retrieved were manipulated. The normal fertilization (2 PN) rate per oocyte was 64.9 ± 26.0% (mean ± SD). Of the 99 transfers, 31 clinical pregnancies were obtained, yielding an average pregnancy rate of 31.3% per transfer. The mean sperm motility, sperm concentration, and sperm motility index were 20.3 ± 16.1% (range, 0 to 50%), 18.2 ± 25.1 × 106/ml (range, <1 to 150 × 106/ml), and 31.2 ± 45.0 (range, 0 to 220), respectively. Sperm concentration did not have a significant impact on fertilization rate by ICSI. In four cases, ICSI was performed using totally immotile sperm and the fertilization rate was 43.5%, which was significantly lower than that of some of the other sperm motility groups, and no pregnancy could be achieved. In 14 cases in which the sperm motility index assessed by the Sperm Quality Analyzer was 0, the fertilization rate (50.0%) was significantly lower than in most of the other sperm motility index groups.

Conclusions:These findings suggest that in severe malefactor cases with totally immotile sperm or a sperm motility index of 0, the selection of good-quality sperm should be verified before injection.

Keywords: intracytoplasmic sperm injection, male-factor infertility, fertilization, Sperm Quality Analyzer

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (580.5 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17–18. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92425-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Van Steirteghem AC, Liu J, Joris H, Nagy Z, Janssenswillen C, Tournaye H, Derde MP, Van Assche E, Devroey P. Higher success rate by intracytoplasmic sperm injection than by subzonal insemination. Report of a second series of 300 consecutive treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1055–1060. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Van Steirteghem AC, Nagy Z, Joris H, Liu J, Staessen C, Smitz J, Wisanto A, Devroey P. High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1061–1066. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.de Mouzon J, Lancaster P. World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization preliminary data for 1995. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14(Suppl):251S–265S. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.In't Veld P, Brandenburg H, Verhoeff A. Sex chromosomal abnormalities and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Lancet. 1995;346:773. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91531-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Govaerts I, Englert Y. Letter to the Editor. Lancet. 1995;346:1096. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liebaers I, Bonduelle M, Van Assche E, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Letter to the Editor. Lancet. 1995;346:1095. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wisanto A, Bonduelle M, Camus M, Tournaye H, Magnus M, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem AC, Devroey P. Obstetric outcome of 904 pregnancies after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(Suppl4):121–129. doi: 10.1093/humrep/11.suppl_4.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bonduelle M, Wilikens A, Buysse A, Van Assche E, Wisanto A, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC, Liebaers I. Prospective follow-up study of 877 children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), with ejaculated epididymal and testicular spermatozoa and after replacement of cryopreserved embryos obtained after ICSI. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(Suppl4):131–155. doi: 10.1093/humrep/11.suppl_4.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Alibrahim N, Inoue M, Hasegawa A, Koyama N, Mitsuo M, Shibahara H, Shigeta M, Koyama K, Shima H, Sawai H. Chromosomal analysis of fetuses obtained by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Jpn J Fertil Steril. 1997;42:227–231. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Camus M, Derde M-P, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. The result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not related to any of the three basic sperm parameters. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1123–1129. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu J, Nagy Z, Joris H, Tournaye H, Smitz J, Camus M, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Analysis of 76 total fertilization failure cycles out of 2732 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2630–2636. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Oehninger S, Veeck L, Lanzendorf S, Malony M, Toner J, Muasher S. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: achievement of high pregnancy rates in couples with severe male factor infertility is dependent primarily upon female and not male factors. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:977–981. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57913-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Svalander P, Jakobsson A-H, Forsberg A-S, Bengtsson, Wikland M. The outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is unrelated to 'strict criteria' sperm morphology. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1019–1022. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shibahara H, Mitsuo M, Inoue M, Hasegawa A, Shigeta M, Koyama K. Relationship between human in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection and the zona-free hamster egg penetration test. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1928–1932. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.7.1928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shibahara H, Mitsuo M, Ikeda Y, Shigeta M, Koyama K. Effects of sperm immobilizing antibodies on pregnancy outcome in infertile women treated with IVF-ET. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1996;36:96–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1996.tb00146.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shibahara H, Funabiki M, Shiotani T, Ikeda Y, Koyama K. A case of primary ovarian pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14:63–64. doi: 10.1007/BF02765755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shibahara H, Naito S, Hasegawa A, Mitsuo M, Shigeta M, Koyama K. Evaluation of sperm fertilizing ability using the Sperm Quality Analyzer. Int J Androl. 1997;20:112–117. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.1997.00043.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gerris J, Mangelschots K, Royen EV, Joostens M, Eestermans W, Ryckaert G. ICSI and severe male-factor infertility: Breaking the sperm tail prior to injection. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:484–486. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Testart J, Lassalle B, Belaisch-Allart J, Hazout A, Forman R, Rainhorn JD, Frydman R. High pregnancy rate after early human embryo freezing. Fertil Steril. 1986;46:268–272. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49524-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Balen AH, MacDougall J, Tan SL. The influence of the number of embryos transferred in 1060 in-vitro fertilization pregnancies on miscarriage rates and pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1324–1328. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vauthier-Brouzes D, Lefebvre G, Lesourd S, Gonzales J, Darbois Y. How many embryos should be transferred in in vitro fertilization? A prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 1994;62:339–342. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56888-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cohen J, Edwards R, Fehilly C, Fishel S, Hewitt J, Purdy J, Rowland G, Steptoe P, Webster J. In vitro fertilization: A treatment for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 1985;43:422–432. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48443-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hirsch I, Gibbons WE, Lipshultz LI, Rossavik KK, Young RL, Poindexter AN, Dodson MG, Findley WE. In vitro fertilization in couples with male factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 1986;45:659–664. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49338-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kahraman S, Tasdemir M, Tasdemir I, Vicdan K, Ozgur S, Polat G, Islk AZ, Biberoglu K, Vanderzwalmen P, Nijs M, Schoysman R. Pregnancies achieved with testicular and ejaculated spermatozoa in combination with intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with totally or initially immotile spermatozoa in the ejaculate. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1343–1346. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nijs M, Vanderzwalmen P, Vandamme B, Segal-Bertin G, Lejeune B, Segal L, Van Roosendaal E, Schoysman R. Fertilizing ability of immotile spermatozoa after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2180–2185. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tournaye H, Liu J, Nagy Z, Verheyen G, Van Steirteghem AC, Devroey P. The use of testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with necrozoospermia. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:331–334. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58462-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Casper RF, Meriano JS, Jarvi KA, Cowan L, Lucato M. The hypo-osmotic swelling test for selection of viable sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with complete asthenozoospermia. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:972–976. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58271-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Barros A, Sousa M, Oliveira C, Silva J, Almeida V, Beires J. Pregnancy and birth after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with totally immotile sperm recovered from the ejaculate. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:1091–1094. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81444-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sukcharoen N, Sithipravej T, Promviengchai S, Chinpilas V, Boonkasemsanti W. Sperm morphology evaluated by computer (IVOS) cannot predict the fertilization rate in vitro after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:564–568. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00555-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vandervorst M, Tournaye H, Camus M, Nagy ZP, Van Steirteghem AC, Devroey P. Patients with absolutely immotile spermatozoa and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2429–2433. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.11.2429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Johnston R, Clarke GN, Liu DY, Gordon Baker HW. Assessment of the Sperm Quality Analyzer. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:1071–1076. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bartoov B, Ben-Barak J, Mayevsky A, Sneider M, Yogev L, Lightman A. Sperm motility index: A new parameter for human sperm evaluation. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:108–112. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54427-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES