Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 1998 Jan;15(2):55–61. doi: 10.1007/BF02766825

Importance of endometrial quality in women with tubal infertility during a natural menstrual cycle for the outcome of IVF treatment

G Csemiczky 1,✉, H Wramsby 1, E Johannisson 2, B -M Landgren 1
PMCID: PMC3455421  PMID: 9513841

Abstract

Purpose: The importance of endometrial maturation at estimated time of implantation for the outcome of IVF treatment in regularly menstruating women with tubal infertility was evaluated.

Methods: FSH was measured on cycle day 3, on days 10–15 urine and blood were collected to estimate the day of the LH peak, and E2 and P4 were measured during the luteal phase, on cycle days 19–26. An endometrial biopsy was obtained on days LH + 3 to LH + 6.

Results: The number of subjects with delayed endometrial maturation was larger in the group of infertile women who did not become pregnant compared to pregnant women and controls. Those infertile women who did not become pregnant after IVF treatment also presented with a higher basal FSH on cycle day 3 and lower E2 and P4 AUC in the luteal phase. Six infertile women and two controls presented with mid- and late-proliferative endometrium in the luteal phase on cycle days LH + 3 to LH + 6, in the presence of adequate E2 and P4 secretion. Six morphological characteristics were compared in the three groups: (1) 17 infertile women who became pregnant, (2) 18 who did not become pregnant, and (3) 28 controls. The pregnant infertile women did not differ from the controls. The numbers of glandular and stromal mitoses were significantly higher in those women who did not become pregnant (P<0.01) compared with those who became pregnant. Endometrial biopsies obtained on cycle days LH + 5 and LH + 6 showed significant differences in glandular epithelial height (P<0.05) and number of vacuolated cells among the nonpregnant women (P<0.01), the pregnant women (P<0.05), and controls.

Conclusions: A higher frequency of retarded endometrial development in women who did not become pregnant following IVF treatment was found. In some cases, endometrial insensitivity could most likely cause retarded endometrial development and failure of implantation after IVF treatment, which could not be overcome by routine luteal-phase support. However, our results do not allow conclusions concerning its relative importance compared to preembryo quality; this has to be investigated further.

Key Words: endometrium, in vitro fertilization outcome, menstrual cycle, ovarian function, tubal infertility

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (580.9 KB).

References

  • 1.Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril. 1950;1:3–25. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.08.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jones GS. Some newer aspects of management of infertility. JAMA. 1949;141:1123–1123. doi: 10.1001/jama.1949.02910160013004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wentz AC. Endometrial biopsy in the evaluation of infertility. Fertil Steril. 1980;33:121–124. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44530-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Balasch J, Creus M, Marquez M, Bruzaco I, Vanrell JA. The significance of luteal phase deficiency on fertility: A diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Hum Reprod. 1986;1:145–147. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li TC, Dockery P, Cooke ID. Endometrial development in the luteal phase of women with various types of infertility: Comparison with women of normal fertility. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:325–330. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li TC, Dockery P, Rogers AW, Cooke ID. A quantitative study of endometrial development in the luteal phase: Comparison between women with unexplained infertility and normal fertility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97:576–582. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02543.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Johannisson E, Parker RA, Landgren B-M, Diczfalusy E. Morphometric analysis of the human endometrium in relation to peripheral hormone levels. Fertil Steril. 1982;38:564–571. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46636-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li TC, Rogers AW, Dockery P, Lenton E, Cook ID. A new method of histologic dating of human endometrium in the luteal phase. Fertil Steril. 1988;50:52–60. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Landgren B-M, Undén AL, Diczfalusy E. Hormonal profile of the cycle in 68 normally menstruating women. Acta Endocrinol (Kbh) 1980;94:89–98. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.0940089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interactions. Cambridge: WHO; 1987. pp. 9–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Johannisson E, Landgren B-M, Rohr HP, Diczfalusy E. Endometrial morphology and peripheral hormone levels in women with regular menstrual cycles. Fertil Steril. 1987;48:401–408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Csemiczky G, Hagenfeldt K, Wramsby H. Selection of ovarian stimulation protocol is related to IVF treatment outcome in women 35 years of age and older. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1994;11:474–477. doi: 10.1007/BF02215711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Csemiczky G, Wramsby H, Landgren B-M. Ovarian function in relation to the outcome of IVF treatment in regularly menstruating women with tubal infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12:683–688. doi: 10.1007/BF02212893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li TC, Dockery P, Thomas P, Rogers AW, Lenton E, Cook ID. The effect of progesterone receptor blockade in the luteal phase of normal fertile women. Fertil Steril. 1988;50:732–742. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60307-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gordon M, Kohorn E, Gore B, Rice S. Effect of postovulatory oestrogens on the fine structure of the epithelial cells in the human endometrium. J Reprod Fertil. 1973;34:375–378. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0340375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wynn R. Histology and structure of the human endometrium. In: Wynn RM, editor. Biology of the Uterus. Boston, London: Plenum Press; 1977. pp. 341–376. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cornille FJ, Lauweryns JM, Brosens IA. Normal human endometrium. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1985;20:113–129. doi: 10.1159/000298983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Israel R, Mishell DJ, Stone S, Thorneycroft I, Moyer D. Single luteal phase progesterone assay as an indicator of ovulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112:1043–1043. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90178-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Radwanska E, Swyer GM. Plasma progesterone estimation in infertile women and in women under treatment with clomiphene and chorionic gonadotropin. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1974;81:107–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1974.tb00427.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li TC, Lenton E, Dockery P, Rogers AW, Cook ID. The relation between daily salivary progesterone profile and endometrial development in the luteal phase of fertile and infertile women. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;96:445–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb02421.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cooke ID, Morgan CA, Parry TE. Correlation of endometrial biopsy and plasma progesterone levels in women. J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonwlth. 1972;78:647–650. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1972.tb14216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cumming DC, Honore LH, Scott JZ, Williams KP. The luteal phase in infertile women: comparison of simultaneous endometrial biopsy and progesterone levels. Fertil Steril. 1985;43:715–719. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48553-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lutjen P, Trounson A, Leeton J, Findlay J, Wood C, Renov P. The establishment and maintenance of pregnancy using in vitro fertilization and embryo donation in a patient with primary ovarian failure. Nature. 1984;307:174–175. doi: 10.1038/307174a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rosenwaks Z. Donor eggs: Their application in modern reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 1987;47:895–909. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59220-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Droesch K, Navot D, Scott R, Kreiner D, Liu H, Rosenwaks Z. Transdermal estrogen replacement in ovarian failure for ovum donation. Fertil Steril. 1988;50:931–934. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60375-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Navot D, Bergh P, Williams M, Garrisi G, Guzman I, Sandler B, Fox J, Schreiner-Engel P, Hofmann G, Grunfeld L. An insight into early reproductive processes through the in vivo model of ovum donation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;72:408–414. doi: 10.1210/jcem-72-2-408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Meldrum D. Female reproductive aging-ovarian and uterine factors. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:1–5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55608-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Navot D, Drews M, Bergh P, Guzman I, Karstaedt A, Scott R, Garrisi G, Hoffman G. Age related decline in female fertility is not due to diminished capacity of the uterus to sustaine embryo implantation. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:97–10. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56459-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Erenus M, Erenus M, Zouves C, Rajamahendran P, Leung S, Fluker M, Gomel V. The effect of embryo quality on subsequent pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:707–710. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54603-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Steer C, Mills C, Tan SL, Campbell S, Edwards R. The cumulative embryo score: A predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:117–119. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gioretti C, Terrou P, Auquier P, Hans E, Spach J-L, Salzman J, Roulier R. Embryo score to predict implantation after in vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2427–2431. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES