Abstract
Purpose: Zona thinning (ZT) is a technique used to improve pregnancy rates among patients ≥38 years old and/or patients presenting previous implantation failure. The objective of the study was to determine whether ZT has a beneficial effect on patients younger than 37 years who are undergoing the first ICSI attempt.
Methods: A total of 103 patients submitted to ICSI for the first time and those aged ≤37 years were divided in a prospective and randomized manner into two groups: group I, patients submitted to ZT (n = 51) (a laser diode with 1.48-μm wavelength (Fertilaser) was used for the procedure); group II, patients with no ZT (n = 52). In both groups, embryo transfer was performed on the second day.
Results: The age of group I patients (31.8 ± 3.6) did not differ (P = 0.53) from that of group II patients (31.4 ± 3.6). The number of metaphase II oocytes was similar(P = 0.76) for the two groups (group I = 9.12 ± 5.27; group II = 8.67 ± 5.02). The average number of embryos available per transfer of group I (6.14 ± 4.02) did not differ (P = 0.69) from that of group II (5.75 ± 3.83). The number of embryos transferred was similar (P = 0.61) for the two groups (group I = 2.76 ± 0.9; group II = 2.87 ± 0.79). The thickness of the zona pellucida of group I embryos (16.6 ± 2.2 μm) did not differ (P = 0.08) from that of group II embryos (17.1 ± 1.7 μm). The rate of embryo implantation (20.8%) and the rate of clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer (40.3%) were higher for group II than for group I (17.7% and 33.3%, respectively), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.55 and P = 0.54).
Conclusions: These results suggest that ZT in the population aged ≤37 years and with no previous failure of implantation may have no impact on intracytoplasmic sperm injection success rates.
Keywords: assisted hatching, laser, zona thinning, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, implantation, pregnancy
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (54.8 KB).
REFERENCES
- 1.Cohen J, Malter H, Wright G, Kort H, Massey J, Mitchell D. Partial zona dissection of human oocytes when failure of zona pellucida penetration is anticipated. Hum Reprod. 1989;4:435–442. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cohen J, Alikani M, Trowbridge J, Rosenwaks Z. Implantation enhancement by selective assisted hatching using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:685–691. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dokras A, Sargent IH, Ross C, Gardner RL, Barlow DH. The human blastocyst: Morphology and human chorionic gonadotrophin secretion in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:1143–1151. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Obruca A, Strohmer H, Sakkas D, Menezo Y, Kogosowski A, Barak Y, Feichtinger W. Use of lasers in assisted fertilization and hatching. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1723–1726. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bider D, Livshits A, Yonish M, Yemini Z, Mashiach S, Dor J. Assisted hatching by zona drilling of human embryos in women of advanced age. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:317–320. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.2.317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lanzendorf SE, Nehchiri F, Mayer JF, Oehninger S, Muasher SJ. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study for the evaluation of assisted hatching in patients with advanced maternal age. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:409–413. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.2.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Blanchet GB, Russell JB, Fincher CR, Jr, Portmann M. Laser micromanipulation in the mouse embryo: A novel approach to zona drilling. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:1337–1341. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55097-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Strohmer H, Feichtinger W. Successful clinical application of laser for micromanipulation in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:212–214. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55166-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nichols J, Gardner RL. Effect of damage to the zona pellucida on development of preimplantation embryos in the mouse. Hum Reprod. 1989;4:180–187. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Khalifa EAM, Tucker MJ, Hunt P. Cruciate thinning of the zona pellucida for more successful enhancement of blastocyst hatching in the mouse. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:532–536. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Antinori S, Panci C, Selman HA, Caffa B, Dani G, Versaci C. Zona thinning with the use of laser: A new approach to assisted hatching in humans. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:590–594. doi: 10.1093/humrep/11.3.590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Svalander P, Forsberg AS, Jakobsson AH, Wikland M. Factors of importance for the establishment of a successful program of intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:828–837. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57489-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Steer CV, Mills CL, Tan SL, Campbell S, Edwards RG. The cumulative embryo score, a predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:117–119. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Harlow GM, Quinn P. Development of preimplantation mouse embryos in vivo and in vitro. Aust J Biol Sci. 1982;35:187–193. doi: 10.1071/bi9820187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schoolcraft WB, Schlenker T, Gee M, Jones GS, Jones HW., Jr Assisted hatching in the treatment of poor prognosis in vitro fertilization candidates. Fertil Steril. 1994;62:551–554. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56944-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schoolcraft WB, Schlenker T, Jones GS, Jones HW., Jr In vitro fertilization in women age 40 and older: The impact of assisted hatching. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12:581–584. doi: 10.1007/BF02212578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stein A, Rufas O, Amit S, Avrech O, Pinkas H, Ovadia J, Fisch B. Assisted hatching by partial zona dissection of human pre-embryos in patients with recurrent implantation failure after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:838–841. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57490-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Check JH, Hoover L, Nazari A, O'Shaughnessy A, Summers D. The effect of assisted hatching on pregnancy rates after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:254–257. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58080-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chao KH, Chen SU, Chen HF, Wu MY, Yang YS, Ho HN. Assisted hatching increases the implantation and pregnancy rate of in vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer (ET), but not that of IVF-tubal ET in patients with repeated IVF failures. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:904–908. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81404-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Fortini D, Aicardi G, Montanaro N. Rescue of implantation potential in embryos with poor prognosis by assisted zona hatching. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1331–1335. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.5.1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hellebaut S, De Sutter P, Dozortsev D, Onghena A, Qian C, Dhont M. Does assisted hatching improve implantation rates after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection in all patients? A prospective randomized study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996;13:19–22. doi: 10.1007/BF02068864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hurst BS, Tucker KE, Awoniyi CA, Schlaff WD. Assisted hatching does not enhance IVF success in good-prognosis patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15:62–64. doi: 10.1007/BF02766826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bertrand E, Van den Bergh M, Englert Y. Does zona pellucida thickness influence the fertilization rate? Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1189–1193. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Garside WT, Loret de Mola JR, Bucci JA, Tureck RW, Heyner S. Sequential analysis of zona thickness during in vitro culture of human zygotes: Correlation with embryo quality, age, and implantation. Mol Reprod Dev. 1997;47:99–104. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199705)47:1<99::AID-MRD13>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Meldrum DR, Wisot A, Yee B, Garzo G, Yeo L, Hamilton F. Assisted hatching reduces the age-related decline in IVF outcome in women younger than age 43 without increasing miscarriage or monozygotic twinning. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15:418–421. doi: 10.1007/BF02744934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Széll AZ, Antaram RJ, Chetkowski RJ: Assisted hatching improves pregnancy rates independently of female age. Abstract of 54th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. October 4-9, San Francisco, CA. Fertil Steril 1998;70 (Suppl. 1):S424