Skip to main content
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 2005 Feb;22(2):89–93. doi: 10.1007/s10815-005-1498-0

How Long Do Parthenogenetically Activated Mouse Oocytes Maintain the Ability to Accept Sperm Nuclei as a Genetic Partner?

Hiroyuki Tateno 1,, Yujiroh Kamiguchi 1
PMCID: PMC3455476  PMID: 15844734

Abstract

Purpose: Cytogenetic risk of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) after artificial oocyte activation (post-activation ICSI) was evaluated in the mouse.

Methods: Mouse zygotes were produced by ICSI into eggs at various intervals after parthenogenetic exposure to strontium (Sr) for 30 min. Male pronucleus formation and the chromosome constitution were studied.

Results: Sperm nuclei injected into oocytes within 1 h after Sr exposure (from early through mid-telophase) transformed normally into male pronuclei, and the number of chromosome aberrations did not significantly increase in the resultant zygotes. When sperm nuclei were injected into eggs at intervals beyond 1 h after Sr exposure (from late telophase through the G1 pronuclear stage), the rate of male pronucleus formation was significantly reduced. The incidence of chromosome aberrations increased with time between oocyte activation and ICSI.

Conclusions: ICSI into oocytes within 1 h after parthenogenetic activation produces cytogenetically competent embryos in the mouse.

Key words: Chromosomes, ICSI, mouse zygotes, oocyte activation

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (141.4 KB).

References

  • 1.Chung JT, Keefer CL, Downey BR. Activation of bovine oocytes following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) Theriogenology. 2000;53:1273–1284. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00271-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hwang S, Lee E, Yoon B, Lee J-H, Choi D. Effects of electric stimulation on bovine oocyte activation and embryo development in intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17:310–314. doi: 10.1023/A:1009496726343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tesarik J, Sousa M. More than 90% fertilization rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and artificial oocyte activation with calcium ionophore. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:343–349. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57366-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang J, Wang C-W, Blaszcyzk A, Grifo JA, Ozil J, Haberman E, Adler A, Krey L. Electrical activation and in vitro development of human oocytes that fail to fertilize after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:509–512. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00264-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nakagawa K, Yamano S, Moride N, Yamashita M, Yoshizawa M, Aono T. Effect of activation with Ca ionophore A23187 and puromycin on the development of human oocytes that failed to fertilize after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:148–152. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01839-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nakagawa K, Yamano S, Nakasaka H, Hinokio K, Yoshizawa M, Aono T. A combination of calcium ionophore and puromycin effectively produces human parthenogenones with one haploid pronucleus. Zygote. 2001;9:83–88. doi: 10.1017/s0967199401001083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tesarik J, Rienzi L, Ubaldi F, Mendoza C, Greco E. Use of a modified intracytoplasmic sperm injection technique to overcome sperm-borne and oocyte-borne activation failures. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:619–624. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03291-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yanagida K, Katayose H, Yazawa H, Kimura Y, Sato A, Yanagimachi R, Yanagimachi H. Successful fertilization and pregnancy following ICSI and electrical oocyte activation. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1307–1311. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Komar A. Fertilization of parthenogenetically activated mouse eggs. Exp Cell Res. 1982;139:361–367. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(82)90260-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoshi K, Yanagida K, Sato A. Pretreatment of hamster oocytes with Ca2+ ionophore to facilitate fertilization by ooplasmic micro-injection. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:871–875. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Maleszewski M, Borsuk E, Koziak K, Maluchnik D, Tarkowski AK. Delayed sperm incorporation into parthenogenetic mouse eggs: Sperm nucleus transformation and development of resulting embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 1999;54:303–310. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199911)54:3<303::AID-MRD11>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chatot CL, Ziomek A, Bavister BD, Lewis JL, Torres I. An improved culture medium supports development of random-bred 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro. J Reprod Fertil. 1989;86:679–688. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0860679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Toyoda Y, Yokoyama M, Hoshi T. Studies on the fertilization of mouse eggs in vitro: I. In vitro fertilization of mouse eggs by fresh epididymal semen. Jpn J Anim Reprod. 1971;16:147–151. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biol Reprod. 1995;52:709–720. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod52.4.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mikamo K, Kamiguchi Y. A new assessment system for chromosomal mutagenicity using oocytes and early zygotes of the Chinese hamster. In: Ishihara T, Sasaki MS, editors. Radiation-Induced Chromosome Damage in Man. New York: Alan R. Liss; 1983. pp. 411–432. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tateno H, Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R. Sonication per se is not as deleterious to sperm chromosomes as previously inferred. Biol Reprod. 2000;63:341–346. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod63.1.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tateno H, Kamiguchi Y. Improvement of male pronuclear formation during cross-fertilization between Chinese hamster spermatozoa and Syrian hamster oocytes by nocodazole, and chromosome analysis of hybrid zygotes. Mol Reprod Dev. 1999;52:117–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tateno H, Kamiguchi Y. Dithiothreitol induces sperm nuclear decondensation and protects against chromosome damage during male pronuclear formation in hybrid zygotes between Chinese hamster spermatozoa and Syrian hamster oocytes. Zygote. 1999;7:321–327. doi: 10.1017/s0967199499000726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES