Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (224.3 KB).
REFERENCES
- 1.Jones HW, Toner J. The infertile couple. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1710–1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312023292307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hovav Y, Hornstein E, Almagor M, Yaffe C. Diagnostic laparoscopy in primary and secondary infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15:535–537. doi: 10.1023/A:1022578019260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Karande VC, Pratt DE, Rabin DS, Gleicher N. The limited value of hysterosalpingography in assessing tubal status and fertility potential. Fertil Steril. 1994;63:1167–1171. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57591-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Karande VC, Pratt DE, Balin MS, Levrant SG, Morris RS, Gleicher N. What is the radiation exposure to patients during a gynecoradiologic procedure? Fertil Steril. 1997;67:401–403. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81931-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gleicher N, Pratt D. Transvaginal procedures for infertility. In: Behrman SJ, Patton GW Jr, Holtz G., editors. Progress in Infertility. 4th ed. Boston: Little, Brown; 1994. pp. 225–248. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Karande VC, Pratt DE, Rao R, Balin M, Gleicher N. Elevated tubal perfusion pressures during selective salpingography are highly suggestive of tubal endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:1070–1073. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57962-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gleicher N, Pratt D, Levrant S, Rao R, Balin M, Karande V. Gynaecoradiological uterine resection. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1801–1803. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Karande V, Gleicher N. Resection of uterine septum using gynecoradiologic techniques. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1226–1229. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Opsahl MS, Miller B, Klein TA. The predictive value of hysterosalpingography for tubal and peritoneal infertility factors. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:444–448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Parsons AK, Lense JJ. Sonohysterography for endometrial abnormalities: Preliminary results. J Clin Urol. 1993;21:87–95. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870210203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Deichert U, Shclief R, Van de Sandt M, Juhnke I. Transvaginal hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (Hy-Co-Sy) compared with conventional tubal diagnostics. Hum Reprod. 1989;4:418–424. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Peters AJ, Coulam CB. Hysterosalpingography with color Doppler ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:1530–1534. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)91432-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cicinelli E, Romano F, Anastasio PS, Blasi N, Parisi C, Galantino P. Transabdominal sonohysterography, transvaginal sonohysteroscopy, and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of submucous fibroids. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:42–47. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00298-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Lai MP, Mais V, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pelvic adhesions. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2649–2653. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.12.2649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zaidi J, Campbell S, Pittrof R, Tan SL. Endometrial thickness, morphology, vascular penetration and velocimetry in predicting implantation in an in vitro fertilization program. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6:191–198. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.06030191.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K, Jauniaux E, Natucci M, Campbell S. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: A comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;5:233–237. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05040233.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chang M-Y, Chang C., Hsieh T-T, Soong YK, Hsu KH. Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:505–510. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00557-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lass A, Skull J, McVeigh E. Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:294–297. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.2.294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Engmann L, Sladkevicius P, Agarwal R, Bekir JS, Campbell J, Tan SL. Value of ovarian stromal blood flow velocity measurement after pituitary suppression in the prediction of ovarian responsiveness and outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil. Steril. 1999;71:22–29. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00406-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]