Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 1999 Jul;16(6):294–301. doi: 10.1023/A:1020497714495

A Study Failing to Determine Significant Benefits from Assisted Hatching: Patients Selected for Advanced Age, Zonal Thickness of Embryos, and Previous Failed Attempts

W Rohini Edirisinghe 1,✉, Vichuda Ahnonkitpanit 1, Sakchai Promviengchai 2, Somchai Suwajanakorn 1, Kamthorn Pruksananonda 1, Viwat Chinpilas 2, Pramuan Virutamasen 1
PMCID: PMC3455535  PMID: 10394524

Abstract

Purpose:Pregnancy and implantation rates after mechanical assisted hatching (AH) in patients aged ≥38 years, with embryos ≥15 μm in zonal thickness and two or more failed attempts, were assessed at two infertility centers using fresh and frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

Methods:AH was performed on 3-day-old embryos. Spare embryos cryopreserved at the two-pronucleus stage were subjected to AH after 2 days of culture and transferred to artificially prepared uteri.

Results:In fresh cycles, no significant differences in pregnancy rates (clinical and ongoing) and implantation rates were observed between the AH and the controls for all three selected patient groups (Centers 1 and 2). In FET cycles, AH tended to give poor results for ≥38 year olds (clinical pregnancy rates of 0 and 5.0% with AH vs 13.3 and 16.7% for controls at Centers 1 and 2, respectively). With AH, embryos with thick zonae implanted to the same extent as those in the control group and achieved pregnancies for patients with multiple failures (four to six attempts for some) in both fresh and FET cycles.

Conclusions:AH failed to show significant benefits in all three patient groups. A larger study group may confirm the effects of AH on frozen/thawed embryos and outcomes for multiple failure cases.

Keywords: assisted hatching, fresh embryos, frozen embryos, selected patients

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (662.8 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Defelice M, Salustri A, Siracusa G. “Spontaneous” hardening of the zona pellucida of mouse oocyte during in vitro culture II. The effect of follicular fluid and glycosaminoglycans. Gamete Res. 1982;12:227–235. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cohen J, Inge KL, Suzman M, Wiker SR, Wright G. Videocine-matography of fresh and cryopreserved embryo: A retrospective analysis of embryonic morphology and implantation. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:820–827. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60673-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cohen J, Elsner C, Kort H, Malter H, Massey J, Mayer MP, Wiemer K. Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation by assisting hatching using micromanipulation. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:7–13. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dokras A, Ross C, Gosden B, Sargent IL, Barlow DH. Micromanipulation of human embryos to assist hatching. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:514–520. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56585-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liu HC, Cohen J, Alikani M, Noyes N, Rosenwaks Z. Assisted hatching facilitates earlier implantation. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:871–875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stein A, Rufas O, Amit S, Avrech O, Pinkas H, Ovadia J, Fisch B. Assisted hatching by partial zona dissection of human pre-embryos in patients with recurrent implantation failure after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:838–841. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57490-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cohen J, Alikani M, Trowbridge J, Rosenwaks Z. Implantation enhancement by selective assisted hatching using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:685–691. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bider D, Livshits A, Yonish M, Yemini Z, Mashiach S, Dor J. Assisted hatching by zona drilling of human embryos in women of advanced age. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:317–320. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.2.317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fong C-Y, Bongso A, Ng S-C, Anandakumar C, Trounson A, Ratnam S. Ongoing normal pregnancy after transfer of zona-free blastocysts: Implications for embryo transfer in the human. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:557–560. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.3.557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee DR, Lee JE, Yoon HS, Lee H-J, Kim MK, Roh SI. The supplementation of culture medium with protease improves the hatching rate of mouse embryos. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2493–2498. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.11.2493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Strohmer H, Feichtinger W. Successful clinical application of laser for micromanipulation in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:212–214. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55166-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Antinori S, Panci C, Selman HA, Caffa B, Dani G, Versaci C. Zona thinning with the use of laser: A new approach to assisted hatching in humans. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:590–594. doi: 10.1093/humrep/11.3.590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khalifa EAM, Tucker MJ, Hunt P. Cruciate thinning of the zona pellucida for more successful enhancement of blastocyst hatching in the mouse. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:532–536. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gordon JW, Talansky BE. Assisted fertilization by zona drilling: A mouse model for correction of oligospermia. J Exp Zool. 1986;239:347–354. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402390306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schoolcraft WB, Schlenker T. In vitro fertilization in women age 40 and older: The impact of assisted hatching. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12(Suppl):106. doi: 10.1007/BF02212578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wiemer KE, Hu Y, Cuervo M, Genetis P, Leibowitz D. The combination of coculture and selective assisted hatching: Results from their clinical application. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:105–110. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56461-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Maghi MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Fertini D, Picardi G, Montanaro N. Rescue of implantation potential in embryos with poor prognosis by assisted hatching. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1331–1335. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.5.1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tucker M, Cohen J, Massey J, Mayer M, Wiker S, Wright G. Partial dissection of the zona pellucida of frozen-thawed human embryos may enhance blastocyst hatching, implantation, and pregnancy rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:341–345. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90088-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Check JH, Hoover L, Nazari A, O'Shaughnessy A, Summers D. The effect of assisted hatching on pregnancy rates after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:254–257. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58080-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Van Steirteghem N. Z., Joris H, Liu J, Staessen C, Smitz J, Wistano A, Devroey P. High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1061–1066. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lassalle B, Testart J, Renard JP. Human embryo features that influence the success of cryopreservation with the use of 1,2-propanediol. Fertil Steril. 1985;44:645–651. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48981-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gordon JW, Dapunt U. A new mouse model for embryos with a hatching deficiency and its use to elucidate the mechanism of blastocyst hatching. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:1296–1301. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55993-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tao J, Tamis R. Application of assisted hatching for 2-day-old, frozen-thawed embryo transfer in poor-prognosis population. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14:128–130. doi: 10.1007/BF02765783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Carrillo AJ, Lane B, Pridham DD, Risch PP, Pool TB, Silverman IH, Cook CL. Improved clinical outcomes for in vitro fertilization delay of embryo transfer from 48 to 72 hours after oocyte retrieval: Use of glucose-and phosphate-free media. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:329–334. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00499-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kasem R, Thompson LA, Srikantharaja A, Laing MA, Hamilton MPR, Templeton A. Cryopreservation of human oocytes and fertilization by two techniques: In-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2650–2654. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Matson PL, Graefling J, Junk SM, Yovich JL, Edirisinghe WR. Cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos: Use of a mouse model to investigate effects upon zona hardness and formulate treatment strategies in an in vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1550–1553. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.7.1550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu HC, Cohen J, Alikani MS, Noyes N, Rosenwaks Z. Assisted hatching facilitates earlier implantation. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:871–875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES