Abstract
With the advancement of assisted reproduction technologies, people are offered wider choices to choose the gender of their offspring and to construct ‘ideal-typed’ families with specific gender structure. Gender selection is welcomed by many societies with gender-specific preference, especially those patriarchal societies such as Chinese communities. It is not only a medical procedure but also a social orientation, which reveals much of the underlying preference towards gender. This paper explores the cultural dimensions to gender selection and its psychosocial meanings and implications in Chinese societies, especially after the establishment of One Child Policy in China. Problems associated with son preference in the culture with strong gender stereotyping are addressed. We believe that gender selection for social reasons should not be allowed since undesirable outcomes will be resulted under such strict population control program.
Keywords: Gender selection, infertility, Chinese culture, male preference, gender ratio, population control
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (63.1 KB).
REFERENCES
- 1.Pollard AM, Yusuf F, Pollard GN. Demographic Technique. 3rd edn. Sydney: Pergamon Press; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 2.China Population Statistical Yearbook 2000. China: China Statistics Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu P, Rose GA. Social aspects of >800 couples coming forward for gender selection of their children. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:968–971. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu M, Chan CLW. Enduring violence and staying in marriage: Stories of battered women in rural China. Violence Against Women. 1999;5:1469–1492. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yi Z, Tu P, Gu B, Xu Y, Li B, Li Y. Causes and implications of the recent increase in the reported sex ratio at birth in China. Popul Dev Rev. 1993;19:293–302. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gu B, Roy K. Sex ratio at birth in China, with reference to other areas in East Asia: What we know. Asia Pac Popul J. 1995;10:17–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Poston DL, Wu JJ, Yuan MM, Glover KS: Patterns and variation in the sex ratio at birth in China and Taiwan. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Chinese Sociologists Association, Washington, DC, 11 August 2000
- 8.Pearson V. Goods on which one loses: Women and mental health in china. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1159–1173. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00424-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pearson V. Population policy and eugenics in China. Br J Psychiatry. 1995;167:1–4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.167.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Spaeth A. Life and death in Shanghai: China lashes out at a human-rights report alleging widespread abuse of orphans. Time Int. 1996;147:4. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yip P. Epidemiology of suicides in Beijing, China. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2001;31:62–70. doi: 10.1521/suli.31.1.62.21311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yip PSF, Callaran C, Yuen HK. An urban and rural differentials: East and west comparison. J Affect Disord. 2000;57:99–106. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00058-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yip PSF, Lee J, Chan B. AUJ:Astudy of demographic changes under sustained below-replacement fertility in Hong Kong SAR. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53:1003–1009. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00395-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Knowledge, Attitude and Practice. Hong Kong: Family Planning Association of Hong Kong; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 15.China Statistical Yearbook 1999. China: China Statistics Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wertz DC, Fletcher JC. Ethical and social issues in prenatal sex selection: A survey of geneticists in 37 nations. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:255–273. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00159-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]