Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 2001 Feb;18(2):78–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1026578507736

CLINICAL ASSISTED REPRODUCTION: Development of Blastocyst-Stage Embryos After Round Spermatid Injection in Patients with Complete Spermiogenesis Failure

Kubilay Vicdan 1, Ahmet Zeki Isik 1, Lale Delilbaşi 1
PMCID: PMC3455553  PMID: 11285985

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to evaluate the progression of embryos derived from round spermatid injection to the blastocyst stage and compare the results with those obtained by the use of testicular or epididymal spermatozoa.

Methods: Thirty-eight patients with azoospermia enrolled in this study. In 29 patients with obstructive or nonobstructive azoospermia, spermatozoa were recovered from epididymis or testis. In the remaining nine cases with nonobstructive azoospermia, only round spermatids were found in seven, whereas in two of the patients, there were no elongated or round spermatids. Six of these cases underwent round spermatid injection.

Results: Twenty-one of 29 patients with injection of spermatozoa underwent embryo transfer on day 3, and 10 pregnancies (47.6%) were obtained. In eight cycles, embryos were further cultured for delayed transfer. In six cases undergoing round spermatid injection, no transfer was performed on day 3 and extended culture with delayed embryo transfer was applied. The mean number of fertilized oocytes and mean number of embryos on day 3 and also the fertilization rate and mean number of good-quality embryos on day 3, mainly grade 1 or 2, were statistically significantly higher in the spermatozoa group than the round spermatid injection group. Compared to the spermatozoa group, the number of arrested embryos was significantly higher and the number of blastocyst-stage embryos and number of good-quality blastocysts were significantly lower in the spermatid injection group. No blastocysts developed in two spermatid cycles and embryo transfer was not possible, and in the remaining four cycles, after at least one blastocyst transfer, no pregnancies were achieved. However, in eight cycles with extended culture in the spermatozoa group, embryo transfers were achieved in all and three pregnancies, for a pregnancy rate of 37.5%, were obtained after blastocyst transfer.

Conclusions: Our preliminary results showed that round spermatid injection was associated with a significantly lower fertilization and embryo development rate and a significantly higher developmental arrest rate compared with the injection of spermatozoa. Extended culture and delayed embryo transfer did not improve the clinical outcome after round spermatid injection, and these results suggested a developmental failure in embryos preventing successful implantation after round spermatid injection.

Keywords: Nonobstructive azoospermia, round spermatid injection, blastocyst, delayed embryo transfer

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (69.7 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Schoysman R, Wanderzwalmen P, Nijs M, Segal L, Segal-Bertin G, Geerts L, van Roosendaal E, Schoysman D. Pregnancy after fertilization with human testicular sperm. Lancet. 1993;342:1237. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92217-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Devroey P, Liu J, Nagy Z, Goossens A, Tournaye H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Silber S. Pregnancies after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in nonobstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1457–1460. doi: 10.1093/humrep/10.6.1457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Edwards RG, Tarin JJ, Dean N, Hirsch A, Tan SL. Are spermatid injections into human oocytes now mandatory? Hum Reprod. 1994;9:2217–2219. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wanderzwalmen P, Lejeune B, Nijs M, Segal-Bertin G, Vandammer B, Schoysman R. Fertilization of an oocyte microinseminated with a spermatid in an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod. 1995;8:502–503. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tesarik J, Mendoza C, Testart J. Viable embryos from injection of round spermatids into oocytes. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:525. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199508243330819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tesarik J, Mendoza C. Spermatid injection into human oocytes. I. Laboratory techniques and special features of zygote development. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:772–779. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tesarik J, Rolet F, Brami C, Sedban E, Thorel J, Tihi C, Thebault A. Spermatid injection into human oocytes. II.Clinical application in the treatment of infertility due to nonobstructive azoospremia. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:780–783. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fishel S, Aslam I, Tesarik J. Spermatid conception:Astage too early, or a time too soon? Hum Reprod. 1995;11:1371–1375. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fishel S, Green S, Hunter A, Lisi F, Rinaldo L, Lisi R, McDemott H. Human fertilization with round and elongated spermatids. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:336–340. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.2.336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Amer M, Soliman E, el-Sadek M, Mendoza C, Tesarik J. Is complete spermiogenesis failure a good indication for spermatid conception? Lancet. 1997;350:116. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61819-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Antinori S, Versaci C, Dani G, Antinori M, Pazza D, Selman HA. Fertilization with human testicular spermatids: four successful pregnancies. Human Reprod. 1997;12:286–291. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.2.286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Antinori S, Versaci C, Dani G, Antinori M, Selman HA. Succesful fertilization and pregnancy after injection of frozenthawed round spermatids into human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:554–556. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.3.554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Araki Y, Motayama M, Yoshida A, Kim SY, Sung H, Araki S. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection with late spermatids: a succesful procedure in achieving childbirth for couples in which the male partner suffers from azoospermia due to deficient spermatogenesis. Fertil Steril. 1992;67:559–561. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)80086-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Barak Y, Kogosowski A, Goldman S, Soffer Y, Gonen Y, Tesarik J. Pregnancy and birth after transfer of embryos that developed from single-nucleated zygotes obtained by injection of round spermatids into oocytes. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:67–70. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00106-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Barros A, Bernabeu R, Takahashi K, et al. Intracytoplasmic injection of ejaculate and testicle spermatids. Report on 35 cycles Hum Reprod 199813154–155.9512249 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Barros A, Takahashi K, Bernabeu R, et al.: Spermatid intracytoplasmic injection: Report on 56 cycles.Fertil Steril 1998;Abstr suppl:S441
  • 17.Bernabeu R, Cremades N, Takahashi K, Sousa M. Succesful pregnancy after spermatid injection. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1898–1900. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.7.1898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sofitikis N, Yamamoto Y, Miyagawa I, Mekros G, Mio Y, Toda Y, Antypas S, et al. Ooplasmic injection of elongating spermatids for the treatment of non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:709–714. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.3.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kahraman S, Sözen E, Vicdan K, Polat G, Özgün OD, Evrenkaya T, Özgür S, Dirican K, Özbiçer T, Alaybeyoğlu L, Bibero?lu K. Fertility after intracytoplasmic round and elongated spermatid injection in males with non-obstructive azoospermia. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14(5Suppl):141S. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wanderzwalmen P, Zech H, Birkenfdeld A. Intracytoplasmic injection of spermatids retrieved from testicular tissue: Influence of testicular pathology, type of selected spermatids and oocyte activation. Hum Reprod. 1997;6:1203–1213. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.6.1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Prapas Y, Chatziparasidou A, Vanderzwalmen P, Nijs M, Prapas N, Lejeune B, Vlassis G, Schoysman R. Spermatid injection. Reconsidering spermatid injection. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2186–2188. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.9.2186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ghazzawi IM, Alhassani S, Taher M, Sousa S. Reproductive capacity of round spermatids compared with spermatozoa in population of azoospermic men. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:736–740. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.3.736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sousa M, Barros A, Takahashi K, Olşveira C, Silva J, Tesarik J. Clinical efficacy of spermatid conception: Analysis using a new spermatid classification scheme. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1279–1286. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gardner DK, Lane M. Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: A feasible proposition for human IVF? Hum Reprod Update. 1997;3:367–382. doi: 10.1093/humupd/3.4.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Scholtes MCW, Zeilmaker HG. Blastocyst transfer in day-5 embryo transfer depends primarily on the number of oocytes retrieved and not on age. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:78–83. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00450-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gardner KD, Vella P, Lane M, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:84–88. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00438-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jones GM, Trounson AO, Gardner DK, Kausche A, Lolatgis N, Wood C. Evolution of a culture protocol for successful blastocyst development and pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:169–177. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.1.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ogura A, Yanagimachi R. Round spermatid nuclei injected into hamster oocytes form pronuclei and participate syngany. Biol Reprod. 1993;48:219–225. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod48.2.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ogura A, Matsuda J, Yanagimachi R. Birth of normal young after electrofusion of mouse oocytes with round spermatids. Proc. Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:7460–7462. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.16.7460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.de Mouzon J, Lancaster P. World Collaborative Report on IVF (preliminary data for 1995) J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14:251S–265S. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gardner DK. Mammalian embryo culture in the absence of serum or somatic cell support. Cell Biol Int. 1994;18:1163–1179. doi: 10.1006/cbir.1994.1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gardner DK, Lane M, Spitzer A, Batt PA. Enhanced rate of cleavage and development for sheep zygotes cultured to the blastocyst stage in vitro in the absence of serum and somatic cells: Amino acids, vitamins, and culturing embryos in groups stimulate development. Biol Reprod. 1994;50:390–400. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod50.2.390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bavister BD. Culture of preimplantation embryos: Facts and artifacts. Hum Reprod Update. 1995;1:91–148. doi: 10.1093/humupd/1.2.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fong CY, Bongso A, Ng SC, Anandakumar G, Trounson A, Ratnam S. Ongoing normal pregnancy after transfer of zonafree blastocysts: Implications for embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:557–560. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.3.557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gardner KD, Vella P, Lane M, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:84–88. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00438-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yamamoto Y, Sofikitis N, Miyagawa I. Ooplasmic injections of rabbit round spermatid nuclei or intact round spermatids from fresh, cryopreserved and cryostored samples. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1506–1515. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.6.1506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Balaban B, Urman B, Işiklar A, Alataş C, Aksoy S, Mercan R, Nuhoğlu A. Progression to the blastocyst stage of embryos derived from testicular round spermatids. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1377–1382. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.6.1377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Edwards RG, Brody SA. Principles and Practice of Assisted Human Reproduction. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jany L, Menezo Y. Evidence for a strong paternal effect on human preimplantation embryo development and blastocyst formation. Mol Reprod Dev. 1994;38:104–110. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080380107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Aslam I, Fishel S. Short-term in-vitro culture and cryopreservation of spermatogenetic cells used for human in vitro conception. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:634–638. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.3.634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tesarik J, Bahçeci M, Özcan C, Greco E, Mendoza C. Restoration of fertility by in vitro spermatogenesis. Lancet. 1999;353:555–556. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)04784-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cremades N, Bernabeu R, Barros A, Sousa M. In vitro maturation of round spermatids using co-culture onVero cells. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1287–1293. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES