Skip to main content
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 2004 Apr;21(4):97–102. doi: 10.1023/B:JARG.0000029492.54243.3c

Human Cervical Mucus Can Act in Vitro as a Selective Barrier Against Spermatozoa Carrying Fragmented DNA and Chromatin Structural Abnormalities

PG Bianchi 1, A De Agostini 1, J Fournier 1, C Guidetti 2, N Tarozzi 1, D Bizzaro 3, GC Manicardi 2
PMCID: PMC3455610  PMID: 15270207

Abstract

Purpose: We have carried out experiments to determine if human cervical mucus can act as an in vitro selective barrier against spermatozoa morphologically normal that carry genetic structural abnormalities.

Methods: Sperm chromatin abnormalities have been evaluated by Chromomycin A3 and “endogenous” nick translation.

Results: The data obtained have shown that spermatozoa possessing higher levels of DNA protamination are more proficient in crossing the cervical mucus barrier. Moreover, the levels of positivity to endogenous nick translation treatment was practically zero in such spermatozoa.

Conclusions: We suggest that sperm penetration of cervical mucus could be used to select sperm preparations free of fragmented DNA or chromatin structural abnormalities for assisted reproduction.

Keywords: Chromatin abnormalities, Chromomycin A3, human cervical mucus, in situ nick translation, spermatozoa

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (166.1 KB).

References

  • 1.Barrat CLR, Osborn JC, Harrison PE, Monks N, Dumphy BC, Lenton EA, Cooke ID. The hypo-osmotic swelling test and sperm mucus penetration test in determining fertilization of the human oocyte. Hum Reprod. 1989;4:430–434. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Eggert-Kruse W, Schwarz H, Rohr G, Demirakca T, Tilgen W, Runnebaum B. Sperm morphology assessment using strict criteria and male fertility under in-vivo conditions of conception. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:139–146. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abu-Heija AT, Fleming R, Jamieson ME, Yates RW, Coutts JR. The predictive value of the sperm-cervical mucus interaction test on the outcome of in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction combined with intrauterine insemination. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;37:232–234. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1997.tb02261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baker HW, Clarke GN, Hudson B, McBain J-C, McGowan MP, Pepperell RJ. Treatment of sperm autoimmunity in men. Clin Reprod Fertil. 1983;2:55–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Katz DF, Overstreet JW, Hanson FW. A new quantitative test for sperm penetration into cervical mucus. Fertil Steril. 1980;33:179–186. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44539-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Katz DF, Morales P, Samuels SJ, Overstreet JW. Mechanisms of filtration of morphologically abnormal human sperm by cervical mucus. Fertil Steril. 1990;54:513–516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Katz DF. Human cervical mucus: Research update. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:1984–1986. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90559-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aitken RJ, Sutton M, Warner P, Richardson DW. Relationship between the movement characteristics of human spermatozoa and their ability to penetrate cervical mucus and zona-free hamster oocytes. J Reprod Fertil. 1985;73:441–449. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0730441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Eggert-Kruse W, Reimann-Andersen J, Rohr G, Pohl S, Tilgen W, Runnebaum B. Clinical relevance of sperm morphology assessment using strict criteria and relationship with sperm-mucus interaction in vivo and in vitro. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:612–624. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57435-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Clarke GN. A simplified quantitative cervical mucus penetration test. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1184–1187. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.6.1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Clarke GN, Garrett C, Baker HW. Quantitative sperm mucus penetration: Modified formulae for calculating penetration efficiency. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1255–1259. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.5.1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Evenson DP, Darzynkiewicz Z, Melamed MR. Relation of mammalian sperm chromatin heterogeneity to fertility. Science. 1980;210:1131–1133. doi: 10.1126/science.7444440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D, Zinaman MJ, Clegg E, Purvis K, Angelis P, Claussen OP. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod. 1999;3:1039–1049. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.4.1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bianchi PG, Manicardi GC, Bizzaro D, Bianchi U, Sakkas D. Effect of deoxyribonucleic acid protamination on fluorochrome staining and in situ nick translation of murine and human nature spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 1993;49:1083–1088. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod49.5.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Manicardi GC, Bianchi PG, Pantano S, Azzoni P, Bizzaro D, Bianchi U, Sakkas D. Presence of endogenous nicks in DNA of ejaculated human spermatozoa and its relationship to Chromomycin A3 accessibility. Biol Reprod. 1995;52:864–867. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod52.4.864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Manicardi GC, Tombacco A, Bizzaro D, Bianchi U, Bianchi PG, Sakkas D. DNA strand breaks in ejaculated human spermatozoa: Comparison of susceptibility to the nick translation and terminal transferase assays. Histochem J. 1998;30:33–39. doi: 10.1023/a:1003214529185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sakkas D, Urner F, Bianchi PG, Bizzaro D, Wagner I, Jaquenoud N, Manicardi GC, Campana A. Sperm chromatin abnormalities can influence decondensation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:837–843. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sakkas D, Urner F, Bizzaro D, Bianchi PG, Manicardi GC, Shoukir Y, Campana A. Sperm nuclear DNA damage and altered chromatin structure: Effect on fertilization and embryo development. Hum Reprod. 1998;4(Suppl):11–19. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_4.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Qiu J, Hales BF, Robaire B. Damage to rat spermatozoal DNA after chronic cyclophosphamide exposure. Biol Reprod. 1995;53:1465–1473. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod53.6.1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Qiu J, Hales BF, Robaire B. Effects of chronic low-dose cyclophosphamide exposure on the nuclei of rat spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 1995;52:33–40. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod52.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lopes S, Sun JG, Juriscova A, Meriano J, Casper RF. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation is increased in poor quality sperm samples and correlated with failed fertilization in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:528–532. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00536-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bianchi PG, Manicardi GC, Bizzaro D, Campana A, Bianchi U, Sakkas D. Use of the guanine-cytosine (GC) specific fluorochrome Chromomycin A3, as an indicator of poor sperm morphology. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996;13:246–250. doi: 10.1007/BF02065944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bizzaro D, Manicardi GC, Bianchi PG, Bianchi U, Mariethoz E, Sakkas D. In situ competition between protamine and fluorochromes for sperm DNA. Mol Hum Reprod. 1998;4:127–132. doi: 10.1093/molehr/4.2.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gao X, Patel DJ. Chromomycin dimer-DNA oligomer complex. Sequence selectivity and divalent cation specificity. Biochemistry. 1990;29:10940–10956. doi: 10.1021/bi00501a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gao X, Mirau P, Patel DJ. Structure refinement of the chromomycin dimer-DNA oligomer complex in solution. J Mol Biol. 1992;223:259–279. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90730-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Goodsell DS, Kopka ML, Cascio D, Dickerson RE. Crystal structure of CATGGCCATG and its implication for A-tract bending models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:2930–2934. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.7.2930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Moghissi KS, Lyner FN. Studies in the human cervical mucus: Mucoids and their relation to sperm penetration. Fertil Steril. 1970;21:234–239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Barros C, Vigil P, Herrera E, Guadarrama A, Bustos-Obregon E. In vitro interaction between human spermatozoa and human cervical mucus. Micr Elect Biol Cell. 1983;7:13–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vigil P, Valdez E. Bases cientìficas de la planificaciòn natural de la familia. Actual Ginec Obstet. 1989;3:59–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vigil P, Perez A, Neira J, Morales P. Post-partum cervical mucus: Biological and rheological properties. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:475–479. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fredricsson B, Björk G. Morphology of postcoital spermatozoa in the cervical secretion and its clinical significance. Fertil Steril. 1977;28:841–845. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)42738-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hanson FW, Overstreet JW. The interaction of human spermatozoa with cervical mucus in vivo. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981;140:173–178. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90105-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Foresta C, Zorzi M, Rossato M, Varotto A. Sperm nuclear instability and staining with aniline blue: Abnormal persistence of histones in spermatozoa in infertile men. Int J Androl. 1992;15:330–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1992.tb01132.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bianchi PG, Manicardi GC, Urner F, Campana A, Sakkas D. Chromatin packaging and morphology in ejaculated human spermatozoa: Evidence of hidden anomalies in normal spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996;2:139–144. doi: 10.1093/molehr/2.3.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hughes CM, Lewis SEM, McClavey-Martin VJ, Tomphson W. The effect of antioxidant supplementation during Percol preparation on human sperm DNA integrity. Mol HumReport. 1998;13:1240–1247. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.5.1240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES