Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 2004 Dec;21(12):437–443. doi: 10.1007/s10815-004-8760-8

A Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies Comparing Major Malformation Rates in IVF and ICSI Infants with Naturally Conceived Children

Alfred A Rimm 1, Alyce C Katayama 2,✉, Mireya Diaz 1, K Paul Katayama 3
PMCID: PMC3455612  PMID: 15704519

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the risk of major malformations in IVF and ICSI infants.

Methods: Forty-four studies published in English since 1990 where the major malformation rate for IVF or ICSI cases was compared to an appropriate control group were reviewed. Nineteen studies met all selection criteria. In addition, a quality score was developed to assess each study based on sample size, timing of diagnosis, appropriateness of control group and other factors.

Results: In 19 studies, the major malformation rates ranged from 0–9.5% for IVF; 1.1–9.7 for ICSI; and 0–6.9% in the control groups. When ICSI was compared to IVF, and multiple births compared to singleton, there were no statistically significant differences. When data from 16 studies involving 28,524 IVF infants and 2,520,988 spontaneously conceived controls and 7 studies involving 7234 ICSI infants and 978,078 controls were pooled, we found an overall odds ratio for the 19 studies of 1.29 (95% CI 1.01–1.67).

Conclusions: The overall odds ratio of 1.29 was statistically significant at the 5% level. These results may be useful for counseling ART patients and properly designing the consent forms used for ART procedures. It is not clear whether this risk is due to the procedures used in ART. We found that some of these studies have design flaws. All of them lacked an appropriate control group, i.e. infertile patients conceiving spontaneously. These flaws may create biases that would in almost all instances increase the risk of major malformations in the study group. Further research with better designed studies will likely result in a better estimate of the risk of major malformations associated with IVF and ICSI.

Keywords: ART major malformation rate, IVF/ICSI major malformation rate, meta-analysis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (101.9 KB).

References

  1. Saunders DM, Mathews M, Lancaster PAL. The Australian Register: Current Research and Future Role. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1988;541:7–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb22237.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Van Steirteghem A, Borduelle M, Devroey P, Liebars I. Follow up of children born after ICSI. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8:111–116. doi: 10.1093/humupd/8.2.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283:2008–2012. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Testart J. Safety of embryo cryopreservation: statistical facts and artefacts: episcientific aspects of the epigenetic factors in artifical procreation(Debate) Hum Reprod. 1998;13:783–785. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.4.783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. A review of ten years experience of ICSI. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2004;10/1:19–28. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Palermo GD, Colombero LT, Schattman GL, Davis OK, Rosenwaks Z. Evolution of pregnancies and initial follow-up of newborns delivered after intra cytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA. 1996;276:1893–1897. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.23.1893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowen JR, Gibson FL, Leslie GI, Saunders DM. Medical and developmental outcome at 1 year for children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Lancet. 1998;351:1529–1534. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10168-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sutcliffe AG, Taylor B, Saunders K, Thornton S, Lieberman BA, Grudzinskas JG. Outcome in the second year of life after in-vitro fertilisation by intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A UK case-control study. Lancet. 2001;357:2080–2084. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05180-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Palermo GD, Neri QV, Hariprashad JJ, Davis OK, Veeck LL, Rosenwaks Z. ICSI and its outcome. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18:161–169. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-12555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wennerholm UB, Bergh C, Hamberger L, Lundin K, Nilsson L, Wikland M, Källén B. Incidence of congenital malformations in children born after ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:944–948. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.4.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ericson A, Källén B. Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: A population-based study. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:504–509. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.3.504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Anthony S, Buitendijk SE, Dorrepaal CA, Lindner K, Braat DDM, Ouden AL. Congential malformations in 4224 children conceived after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2089–2095. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.8.2089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:725–730. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Isaksson R, Gissler M, Tiitinen A. Obstetric outcome among women with unexplained infertility after IVF: a matched case-control study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1755–1761. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.7.1755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ludwig M, Katalinic A. Pregnancy course and health of children born after ICSI depending on parameters of male factor infertility. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:351–357. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Merlob P, Fisch B. Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3004–3005. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.11.3004-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MRC Working Party, Rose G, Beral V, Davis JA, Edwards RG, Harper PS, O Loudon JD. Births in Great Britain resulting from assisted conception. BMJ. 1990;300:1229–1233. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6734.1229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Westergaard HB, Johansen AM, Erb K, Andersen A. Danish national in-vitro fertilization registry 1994 and 1995: A controlled study of births, malformations and cytogenetic findings. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1896–1902. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.7.1896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. D Souza SW, Rivlin E, Cadman J, Richards B, Buck P, Lieberman BA. Children conceived by in vitro fertilisation after fresh embryo transfer. Arch Dis Child. 1997;76:F70–F74. doi: 10.1136/fn.76.2.f70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Verlaenen H, Cammu H, Derde MP, Amy JJ. Singleton pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: expectations and outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:906–910. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00322-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sutcliffe AG, D Souza SW, Cadman J, Richards B, McKinlay IA, Lieberman B. Minor congenital anomalies, major congenital malformations and development in children conceived from cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:3332–3337. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zádori J, Kozinszky Z, Orvos H, Katona M, Kaáli SG, Pál A. The incidence of major birth defects following in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20:131–132. doi: 10.1023/A:1022682908307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pinborg A, Loft A, Rasmussen S, Schmidt L, Langhoff-Ross J, Greisen G, Andersen AN. Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 3438 IVF/ICSI and 10362 non-IVF/ICSI twins born between 1995 and 2000. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:435–441. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Place I, Englert Y. A prospective longitudinal study of the physical, psychomotor and intellectual development of singleton children up to 5 years who were conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with children conceived spontaneously and by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1388–1397. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wennerholm UB, Albertsson-Wikland K, Bergh C, Hamberger L, Niklasson A, Nilsson L, Thiringer K, Wennergren M, Wikland M, Borres MP. Postnatal growth and health in children born after cryopreservation as embryos. Lancet. 1998;351:1085–1090. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08247-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Society for, Society for. Reproductive Medicine: Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1998 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:18–31. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02985-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tarlatzis B, Bili H. Survey on intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Report from the ESHRE ICSI Task Force. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(suppl 1):165–177. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.9.2356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. DerSimonian R, Laird NM. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–188. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. New York State Department of Health: Congenital Malformations Registry Annual Report: Statistical Summary of Children Born in 1990 and Diagnosed through 1992. Albany, NY, 1995
  30. Draper ES, Kurinczuk JJ, Abrams KR, Clarke M. Assessment of separate contributions to perinatal mortality of infertility history and treatment: a case-control analysis. Lancet. 1999;353:1746–49. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08500-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Khoury MJ, Erickson JD. Recurrent pregnancy loss as an indicator for increased risk of birth defects: a population-based case-control study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1993;7(4):404–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1993.tb00422.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ghazi HA, Spielberger C, Källën B. Delivery outcome after infertility—a registry study. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:726–732. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54238-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Basso O, Baird DD. Infertility and preterm delivery, birthweight and Caesarean section: A study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Human Reprod. 2003;18:2478–2484. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schreurs A, Legius E, Meuleman C, Fryns JP, D’Hooghe TM. Increased frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in female partners of couples undergoing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:94–96. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00558-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lange JG, Engel W. Chromosome studies in in-vitro fertilization patients. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:572–574. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Legius E, Matthijs G, Cuppens H, Vanderschueren D, D’Hooghe TM, Ombelet W, Gordts S, Fryns JP. Genetic aspects and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an update on non Y-chromosomal genetic defects. Studies in Profertility Series. 1998;8:123–9. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES