Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 2005 Jun;22(6):245–249. doi: 10.1007/s10815-005-5147-4

Relationship between the number of veins ligated in a varicocelectomy with testicular volume, hormonal levels and semen parameters outcome

Fábio Firmbach Pasqualotto 1,3,✉, Antônio Marmo Lucon 2, Plínio Moreira de Góes 2, Bernardo Passos Sobreiro 2, Jorge Hallak 2, Eleonora Bedin Pasqualotto 1, Sami Arap 2
PMCID: PMC3455722  PMID: 16021853

Abstract

Purpose: Correlate semen analysis, hormones, and testicular volume with the number of veins ligated.

Methods: Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 (≤5 veins), Group 2 (6–10 veins), and Group 3 (> 10 veins). We evaluated testicular volume, hormonal levels, sperm concentration, and motility before and after the surgical procedure.

Results: In Group 1, even though there was an improvement in both testicular volume and sperm concentration; testosterone levels and sperm motility did not improve with surgery. In Group 2, no changes were detected in the both testicular volumes, in sperm concentration, motility, and testosterone levels. In Group 3, an improvement was seen in the right testicle volume, testosterone levels, and sperm concentration. Follicle-stimulating hormone levels decreased following the surgical procedure in all groups.

Conclusion: Patients with more than 10 ligated veins have better chances to improve sperm concentration. FSH levels decreased in all groups of patients.

Keywords: Hormone, semen, spermatozoa, testicle, veins

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (68.2 KB).

References

  • 1.Schlesinger MH, Wilets IF, Nagler HM. Treatment outcome after varicocelectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 1994;21:517–529. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kamal KM, Javeri K, Zini A. Microsurgical varicocelectomy in the era of assisted reproductive technology: Influence of initial semen quality on pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:1013–1016. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01698-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, et al. Best Practice Policy Committee of the American Urological Association. Inc Fertil Steril. 2002;77(5):873–8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03105-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Redmon JB, Carey P, Pryor JL. Varicocele—the most common cause of male factor infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(1):53–58. doi: 10.1093/humupd/8.1.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pasqualotto FF, Lucon AM, Hallak J, et al. Induction of spermatogenesis in azoospermic men undergoing varicocele repair. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:108–112. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Matthews GJ, Matthews ED, Goldstein M. Induction of spermatogenesis and achievement of pregnancy after microsurgical varicocelectomy in men with azoospermia and severe oligoasthenospermia. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:71–75. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00108-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kim ED, Leibman BB, Grinblat DM, et al. Varicocele repair improves semen parameters in azoospermic men with spermatogenic failure. J Urol. 1999;162:737–740. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199909010-00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kadioglu A, Tefkeli A, Cayan S, et al. Microsurgical inguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men. Urology. 2001;57:328–333. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00908-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Esteves SC, Glina S: Recovery of spermatogenesis after microsurgical varicocele repair in azoospermic men is related to testicular histology. J Urol suppl 1999;Abst:1199, 311 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10.Marmar JL. The pathophysiology of varicoceles in the light of current molecular and genetic information. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(5):461–472. doi: 10.1093/humupd/7.5.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Naughton C, Nangia A, Agarwal A. Pathophysiology of varicoceles in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;7:473–481. doi: 10.1093/humupd/7.5.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pasqualotto FF, Sharma RK, Nelson DR, et al. Relationship between oxidative stress, semen characteristics and clinical diagnosis in men undergoing infertility investigation. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:459–464. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00567-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sharma RK, Pasqualotto FF, Nelson DR, Thomas AJ, Jr, Agarwal A. ROS-TAC is a novel marker of oxidative stress. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2801–2807. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.11.2801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Steckel J, Dicker AP, Goldstein M. Relationship between varicocele size and response to varicocelectomy. J Urol. 1993;149:769–771. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36203-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schlesinger MH, Wilets IF, Nagler HM. Treatment outcome after varicocelectomy. Urol. Clin North Am. 1994;21:517–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zini A, Buckspan M, Berardinucci D, Jarvi K. The influence of clinical and subclinical varicocele on testicular volume. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:671–674. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00311-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Belani J, Naughton CK. 58th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2002;76(S 210):288. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jarow JP. Effects of varicocele on male fertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(1):59–64. doi: 10.1093/humupd/7.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cozzolino DJ, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele as a progressive lesion: Positive effect of varicocele repair. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2001;17:55–58. doi: 10.1093/humupd/7.1.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Takihara H, Sakatoku J, Cockett AT. The pathophysiology of varicocele in male infertility. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:861–868. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54288-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sofikitis N, Dritsas K, Miyagawa I, Koutselinis A. Anatomical characteristics of the left testicular venous system in man. Arch Androl. 1993;30:79–85. doi: 10.3109/01485019308987738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sofikitis N, Miyagawa I. Effects of surgical repair of experimental left varicocele on testicular temperature, spermatogenesis, sperm maturation, endocrine function, and fertility in rabbits. Arch Androl. 1992;29:163–175. doi: 10.3109/01485019208987721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sofikitis NV, Takahashi C, Nakamura I, Hirakawa S, Miyagawa I. Surgical repair of secondary right varicocele in rats with primary left varicocele: Effects on fertility, testicular temperature, spermatogenesis, and sperm maturation. Arch Androl. 1992;28:43–52. doi: 10.3109/01485019208987679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Scherr D, Goldstein M. Comparison of bilateral versus unilateral varicocelectomy in men with palpable bilateral varicoceles. J Urol. 1999;162:85–88. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199907000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Daitch JA, Bedaiwy MA, Pasqualotto EB, et al. Varicocelectomy improves intrauterine insemination success rates in men with varicocele. J Urol. 2001;165:1510–1513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shiraishi K, Takihara H, Naito K. Internal spermatic vein diameter and age at operation reflects the response to varicocelectomy. Andrologia. 2001;33(6):351–355. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0272.2001.00452.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES