Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 2003 Jan;20(1):1–7. doi: 10.1023/A:1021286119979

Pronuclear and Morphological Features as a Cumulative Score to Select Embryos in ICSI (Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection) Cycles According to Sperm Origin

Lia Mara Rossi-Ferragut 1, Assumpto Iaconelli Jr 2, Tsutomu Aoki 2, Claudia Chagas Rocha 3, Daniela Regina dos Santos 3, Fábio Firmbach Pasqualotto 4, Edson Borges Jr 2
PMCID: PMC3455800  PMID: 12656060

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze best parameter to select embryos according to sperm origin in ICSI cycles.

Methods: One hundred seventy-two ICSI cycles were divided among three different groups: A (ejaculated spermatozoa from nonmale factor infertility), B (ejaculated spermatozoa from oligospermia), and C (spermatozoa from azoospermia). Embryos were divided on Day 1 into two patterns: S0 (pronuclei (PN) aligned and close with normal arrangement of nucleoli) and S1 (when these characteristics were absent) and also on transfer day according to morphological features.

Results: Relationships of PN patterns related to sperm origin were noted. More S0 embryos were detected with better sperm quality. Higher number of good quality embryos was obtained when male factor was absent. Ejaculated and epididymal spermatozoa provide better quality embryos than do testicular spermatozoa.

Conclusions: PN classification associated with transfer day morphology is valuable additional noninvasive criterion for elective embryo transfer, mainly in the cases with severe male factor.

Keywords: Embryo selection, ICSI, morphological features, PN morphology, sperm origin

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (71.7 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Balakier H, MacLusky NJ, Casper RF. Characterization of the first cell cycle in human zygotes: Implications for cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:359–365. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55678-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Staessen C, Janssenswillen C, van den Abbeel E, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Avoidance of triplet pregnancies by elective transfer of two good quality embryos. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1650–1653. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Xia P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Correlation of oocyte grade based on polar body, perivitelline space and cytoplasmic inclusions with fertilization rate and embryo quality. Hum Reprod. 2000;12:1750–1755. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.8.1750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tesarik J, Junca AM, Hazout A, et al. Embryos with high implantation potential after intracytoplasmic sperm injection can be recognized by a simple, non-invasive examination of pronuclear morphology. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(6):1396–1399. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.6.1396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Handarson T, Hanson C, Sjogren A, Lundin K. Human embryos with unevenly sized blastomeres have lower pregnancy and implantation rates: Indications for aneuploidy and multinucleation. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(2):313–31. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.2.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fasolino A, Longo V, Capece G, et al. Evaluation of oocyte maturity in patients undergoing ICSI and R-FSH treatment. Minerva Ginecol. 2001;53(3):157–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wright G, Wiker S, Elsner C, et al. Observations on the morphology of pronuclei and nucleoli in human zygotes and implications for cryopreservation. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:109–115. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Scott LA, Smith S. The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(4):1003–1013. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.4.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tesarik J, Grecco E. The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(5):1318–1323. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Demirel LC, Evirgen O, Aydos K, Unlu C. The impact of the source of spermatozoa used for ICSI on pronuclear morphology. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(11):2327–2332. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17–18. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92425-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ebner T, Moser M, Yaman C, et al. Elective transfer of embryos selected on the basis of first polar body morphology is associated with increased rates of implantation and pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(4):599–603. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00315-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Garello C, Baker H, Rai J, et al. Pronuclear orientation, polar body placement, and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in-vitro fertilization: Further evidence for polarity in human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(10):2588–2595. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.10.2588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hsu MI, Mayer J, Aronshon M, et al. Embryo implantation in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Impact of cleavage status, morphology grade and number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(4):679–685. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00320-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, De Neubourg D, et al. Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(9):2345–2349. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.9.2345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Navot D, Bergh AB, Williams MA, et al. Poor oocyte rather than implantation failure as a cause of age related decline in female fertility. Lancet. 1991;337:1375–1377. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93060-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Devroey P, Godoy H, Smitz J, et al. Female age predicts embryonic implantation after ICSI: A case controlled study. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1324–1327. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Adonakis G, Camus M, Joris H, et al. The role of the number of replaced embryos on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in women over the age of 40. Hum Reprod. 1997;11:2542–2545. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.11.2542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Osmanagaoglu K, Tournaye H, Kolibianakis E, et al. Cumulative delivery rates after ICSI in women aged >37 years. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(4):944–949. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.4.940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kably AA, Carballo E, Karchmer KS. Gamete laboratory. Determining factors of success in in-vito fertilization. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2001;69:172–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mikkelsen A., Lindenberg S. Morphology of in-vitro matured oocytes: Impact on fertility potential and embryo quality. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(8):1714–1718. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.8.1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, et al. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:112–117. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59660-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ron-El R, Raziel A, Strassburger D, et al. Outcome of assisted reproductive technology in women over the age of 41. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:471–475. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00697-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Borges E, Jr, Rossi-Ferragut LM, Rocha CC, Iaconelli A., Jr Influence of sperm quality in ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) cycles outcomes. Braz J Urol. 2001;27:P238. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Steer CV, Mills CL, Tan SL, et al. The cumulative embryo score: A predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:117–119. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ludwig M, Schopper B, Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K. Clinical use of a pronuclear stage score following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Impact on pregnancy rates under the conditions of the German embryo protection law. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(12):325–329. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.2.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lundqvist M, Johansson U, Lundkvvist O, et al. Does pronuclear morphology and/or early cleavage rate predict embryo implantation potential? RBM on line. 2001;2(1):12–16. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62182-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wittemer C, Bettahar-Lebugle K, Ohl J, et al. Zygote evaluation: An efficient tool for embryo selection. Hum Reprod. 2000;5(2):2591–2597. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.12.2591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pasqualotto FF, Rossi-Ferragut LM, Rocha CC, et al. Outcome of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic injection of epididymal and testicular sperm obtained from patients with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol. 2002;167:1753–1756. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schatten G. The centrosome and its mode of inheritance: The reduction of the centrosome during gametogenesis and its restoration during fertilization. Dev Biol. 1984;165:2999–3335. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Browder LW, Erickson CA, Jeffrey WR. Developmental Biology. 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sathananthan AH, Kola I, Truounson A, et al. Centrioles in beginning of human development. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1991;88:4806–4810. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.11.4806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rossi-Ferragut LM, Iaconelli A, Aoki T, et al. Zygote morphology scoring in male and female factor in ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(1):O–109,45. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rocha CC, Iaconelli A, Rossi-Ferrragut LM, et al. Clinical use of a pronuclear stage score following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) compared with chromosomal status. Fertil Steril. 2000;S175:P–252. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rossi-Ferragut LM, Iaconelli A, Rocha C, et al. Relationships between pronuclei and nucleoli morphology with the prognosis in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. Fertil Steril. 2001;S124:P–38. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES