Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 2001 Jul;18(7):364–370. doi: 10.1023/A:1016666221500

Andrology: Evaluation of Cryoinjury of Spermatozoa After Slow (Programmed Biological Freezer) or Rapid (Liquid Nitrogen Vapour) Freeze–Thawing Techniques

M E Hammadeh 1, D Szarvasy 1, T Zeginiadou 1, P Rosenbaum 1, T Georg 2, W Schmidt 1
PMCID: PMC3455821  PMID: 11499319

Abstract

Purpose: This study was initiated to determine the negative effect (cryodamage) on human spermatozoa after freeze–thawing and to find out whether freezing of spermatozoa with a computerized biological freezer is more advantageous than freezing above static liquid nitrogen vapour with regard to spermatozoa vitality, chromatin normality, morphology, and membrane integrity.

Methods: Forty-four semen samples were obtained from patients attending andrology laboratory, and each sample was divided into two aliquots. One aliquot was frozen using static liquid nitrogen vapour (G.II) and the second with a computerized biological freezer (G.III). Acridine orange was used for assessment of chromatin cryoinjury, whereas the morphology was evaluated according to WHO criteria. Hypo-osmotic swelling test was used to identify membrane integrity and eosin–nigrosin staining was used to determine the vitality of spermatozoa.

Results: The mean percentage of normally condensed chromatin in the native semen sample (G.I) decreased significantly (p < .001) after freeze–thawing by using either liquid nitrogen vapour (G.II), or a biological freezer (G.III), which was significantly higher (p < .001) after freezing with liquid nitrogen vapour than after freezing with the biological programmed freezer. Morphologically normal spermatozoa decreased significantly (p < .001) in both freezing methods in comparison to the native semen samples. In addition, membrane integrity of spermatozoa (HOS-test positive) was significantly lower (p < .001) after the freeze–thawing procedure in G.II and G.III compared to G.I. In both these parameters the deterioration was similar among the two freezing procedures. Finally the mean percentage of live spermatozoa decreased significantly (p < .001) in both freezing techniques in relation to the mean value in the neat semen samples.

Conclusions: Freeze–thawing procedure has a detrimental effect on chromatin, morphology, membrane integrity, and vitality of human spermatozoa not only by freezing above static liquid nitrogen vapour but even by using a computerized biological freezer. However, the chromatin deterioration rates are significantly higher by freezing above static liquid nitrogen vapour in comparison to freezing with a programmed biological freezer. Therefore, we recommend the use of this technique for freezing semen especially when ICSI technique is considered as the main therapeutic procedure.

Keywords: computerized biological freezer, freeze–thawing procedure, spermatozoa chromatin and morphology, static liquid nitrogen

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (64.9 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Polge C, Smith AU, Parks AS. Survival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration at low temperatures. Nature. 1949;164:666–676. doi: 10.1038/164666a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Farrant J. General principles of cell preservation. In: Richardson DW, Joce D, Symond EM, editors. Frozen Human Semen. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff; 1980. p. 6. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Holt WV. Basic aspect of frozen storage of seme. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000;62:3–22. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320(00)00152-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Foote RH. Semen quality from the bull to the freezer: An assessment. Theriogenology. 1975;4:219–235. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(75)90140-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Graham EG. The Integrity of Frozen Spermatozoa. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science; 1978. Fundamentals of the preservation of spermatozoa; pp. 4–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Watson PF. The preservation of semen in mammals. In: Finn CA, editor. Oxford Review of Reproductive Biology. London: Oxford University Press; 1979. pp. 283–350. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mazur P. Equilibrium quasi-equilibrium and non equilibrium freezing of mammalian embryos. Cell Biophys. 1990;17:53–92. doi: 10.1007/BF02989804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mazur P. Kinetics of water loss from cells at subzero temperatures and the likelihood of intracellular freezing. J Gen Physiol. 1963;47:368. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.2.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Farrant J. Mechanism of injury and protection in living cells and tissues at low temperaturees. In: Smith AU, editor. Current Trends in Cryobiology. New York: Plenum; 1970. pp. 139–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Muldrew K, McGann LE. The osmotic rupture hypothesis of intracellular freezing injury. Biophys J. 1994;66:532–541. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(94)80806-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Watson PF, Duncan AE. Effect of salts concentration and unfrozen water fraction on the viability of slowly frozen ram spermatozoa. Cryobiology. 1988;25:131–142. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(88)90006-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kincade RC, Colvin KL, Kleinhans FW, Critser ES, Mazur P, Critser JK. The effect of cooling rate and repeated freezing on human sperm cryosurvival. J Androl. 1989;10(Suppl):48. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Henry MA, Noiles EE, Gao DY, Mazur P, Critser JK. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa. IV. The effect of cooling rate and warming rate on the maintenance of motility, plasma membrane integrity, and mitochondrial function. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:911–918. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Holt WV, North RD. Cryopreservation, actin localization and thermotropic phase transmsition inramspermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 1991;91:451–461. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0910451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hammerstedt RH, Graham JK, Nolan JP. Cryopreservation of mammalian sperm: What we ask them to survive. J Androl. 1990;11:73–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Alvarez JG, Storey BT. Evidence of increased lipid peroxidative damage and loss of superoxide dismutase activity as amode of sublethal cryodamge to human sperm during cryopreservation. J Androl. 1992;13:232–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Crister JK, Arenson BW, Aaker DV, Huse-Benda AR, Ball GD. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa. II. Postthaw chronology of motility and of zona-free hamster ova penetration. Fertil Steril. 1987;47:980–984. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59233-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Check ML, Check JH. Poor hypo-osmotic swelling test result from cryopreserved sperm despite preservation of sperm motility. Arch Androl. 1991;26:37–41. doi: 10.3109/01485019108987624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cross LN, Hanks SE. Effect of cryopreservationon human sperm acrosomes. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:1279–1283. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hammadeh ME, Georg T, Rosenbaum P, Schmidt W: Association between freezing agent and acrosome damage of human spermatozoa from subnormal and normal semen. Andrologia; in press [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21.Royere D, Barthelemy C, Hamamah S, Lansac J. Cryopreservation of spermatozoa: A review. Hum Reprod Update. 1996;2:553–559. doi: 10.1093/humupd/2.6.553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Menkveld R, Stander FSH, Kotze TJW, Kruger TF, Van Zyl JA. The evaluation of morphologic characteristics of human spermatozoa according to strict criteria. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:586–592. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tejada RI, Mitchell JC, Norman A, Marik JJ, Friedman S. A test for the practical evaluation of male fertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. Fertil Steril. 1984;42:87–91. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47963-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jeyendran RPS, Van der Ven HH, Perez-Palez M, Crabo BG, Zaneveld LJ. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. Reprod Fertil. 1984;70:219–228. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0700219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Eliasson R, Treich L. Supravital staining of human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril. 1971;22:134. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)38049-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dott HM, Foster GC. A technique for studying the morphology of mammalian spermatozoa which are eosinophilic in a differential life dead stain. J Reprod Fertil. 1972;29:443. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0290443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Centola GM, Raubertas RF, Mattox JH. Cryopreservation of human semen: Comparison of cryopreservation, sources of variability, and prediction of post-thaw survival. J Androl. 1992;13:283–288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sherman JK. Current status of clinical cryobanking of human sperm. In: Paulson JD, Negrovilar A, Lucena E, Martinia L, editors. Andrology: Male Fertility and Sterility. New York: Academic Press; 1986. pp. 517–549. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McLaughlin EA, Ford WCL, Hull MGR. A comparison of the freezing semen in the uncerculated vapour above liquid nitrogen and in a commercial semi-programmable freezer. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:728–734. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Serafini PC, Hauser D, Moyer D, Marrs RP. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa: Correlation of ultrastructural sperm head configuration with sperm motility and ability to penetrate zona free hamster ova. Fertil Steril. 1986;46:691–695. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49650-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ragni G, Caccamo AM, Della Serra A, Guercilena S. Computerized slow-staged freezing of semen from men with testicular tumours or Hodgkin's disease preserves sperm better than standard vapour freezing. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:1072–1075. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53588-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Verheyen G, Pletinex I, Van Steirtegham A. Effect of freezing method, thawing temperature and post-thaw dilution/washing on motility ( CASA) and morphology characteristics of highquality human sperm. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1678–1684. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thachil JV, Jewett MS. Preservation techniques for human semen. Fertil Steril. 1981;35:546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wolf DP, Patton PE. Sperm cryopreservation: State of the art. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Trans. 1989;6:325–327. doi: 10.1007/BF01138770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Check ML, Check JH, Long R. Detrimental effects of cryopreservation on structural and functional integrity of the sperm membrane. Arch Androl. 1991;27:155–160. doi: 10.3109/01485019108987666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Spittaler PJ, Tylor JP. Further evaluation of a simple test for determining the integrity of spermatozoa membranes. Clin Reprod Fertil. 1985;3:187–196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chan SY, Craft IL, Chan YM, Leong MK, Leung CK. The hypoosmotic swelling test and cryosurvival of human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:715–718. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Esteves SC, Sharma RK, Thomas AJR, Agrawal A. Suitability of the hypo-osmotic swelling test for assessing the viability of cryopreserved sperm. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:798–804. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Check ML, Check DJ, Katsoff JH. Improved results of thawed sperm cryopreserved with slow stage cooling with a cellevator. Arch Androl. 1996;37:61–64. doi: 10.3109/01485019608988503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Royere D, Hamamah S, Nicolle JC, Barthelemy C, Lansac J. Freezing and thawing alter chromatin stability of ejaculated human spermatozoa: Fluorescence acridine orange staining and Feulgen-DNA cytophotometrics studies. Gamet Res. 1988;21:51. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1120210107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hamamah S, Royere D, Nicolle JC, Paquignon M, Lansac J. Effect of freezing on the spermatozoa nucleus: A comparative chromatin cytophotometric study in the porcine and human species. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1990;30:59–64. doi: 10.1051/rnd:19900105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bach O, Glander HJ, Scholz G., Schwarz J. Elektrophoretic patterns of spermatozoal nucleoproteins (NP) in fertile men and infertile patients and comparison with NP of somatic cells. Andrologia. 1990;22:217–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1990.tb01969.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Foresta C, Zorzi M, Rossato M, Varotto A. Sperm nuclear instability and staining with aniline blue: Abnormal persistence of histones in spermatozoa in infertile men. Int J Androl. 1992;15:330–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1992.tb01132.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hammadeh ME, Askari A, Gerorg T, Rosenbaum P, Schmidt W. Effect of freeze-thawing procedure on chromatin stability, morphological alteration and membrane integrity of human spermatozoa in fertile and subfertile men. Int J Androl. 1999;22:155–162. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.1999.00162.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nogueira D, Bourgain C, Verheyen G, Van Steirtegham AC. Light and electron microscopic analysis of human testicular spermatozoa and spermatids from frozen and thawed testicular biopsies. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2041–2049. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.8.2041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Barthelemy C, Royere D, Hammamah S, Lebos C, Tharanne MJ, Lansac J. Ultrastructure changes in membrane and acrosomes of human sperm during cryopreservation. Arch Androl. 1990;25:29–40. doi: 10.3109/01485019008987591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Royere D, Hamamah S, Nicolle JC, Lansac J. Chromatin alterations induced by freeze-thawing influence the fertilizing ability of human sperm. Int J Androl. 1991;14:328–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1991.tb01100.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ohsako S, Nagano R, Sugimoto Y, Goto K. Comparison of the nuclear DNA stability against freezing-thawing and high temperature treatments between spermatozoa and somatic cells. Vet Med Sci. 1997;59:1085–1088. doi: 10.1292/jvms.59.1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pederson H, Lebech PE. Ultrastructure changes in the human spermatozoon after freezing for artificial insemination. Fertil Steril. 1971;22:125–133. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)38048-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Keel BA, Webster BW, Roberts DK. Effect of cryopreservation on the motility characteristics of human spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 1987;81:213–220. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0810213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mahadevan M, Trounson AO. Effect of cooling, freezing and thawing rates and storage conditions on preservation of human spermatozoa. Andrologia. 1984;16:52–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.1984.tb00234.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.McLaughlin EA, Ford WC, Hull MG. The contribution of the toxicity of a glycerol-egg yolk-citrate cryopreservative to the decline in human sperm motility during cryopreservation. J Reprod Fertil. 1992;95:749–754. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0950749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES