Skip to main content
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 2001 Jul;18(7):382–386. doi: 10.1023/A:1016622506479

Clinical Assisted Reproduction: Increased Body Mass Index Has a Deleterious Effect on In Vitro Fertilization Outcome

J B Loveland 1, Howard D McClamrock 1, Andrew M Malinow 2, Fady I Sharara 1
PMCID: PMC3455823  PMID: 11499322

Abstract

Purpose: Few studies have addressed the effect of weight on IVF outcome, with some showing a decrease in IVF success and some showing no change in overweight women (BMI > 25 kg/m2) compared to women with normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2).

Methods: One hundred thirty-nine women <40 years old undergoing 180 IVF cycles with fresh embryo transfers were retrospectively evaluated between January 1997 and March 1999, stratified by body mass index (BMI) (cutoff of 25).

Results: In the group with BMI > 25 kg/m2, basal FSH, implantation rates (IR), and pregnancy rates (PR) were significantly lower, while the duration of stimulation, gonadotropin requirements, and spontaneous miscarriages were slightly higher, compared to the BMI ≤ 25 group.

Conclusions: Excess weight defined as BMI > 25 kg/m2 has a negative impact on IVF outcome. Future prospective studies evaluating oocyte and/or embryo quality, and androgen and insulin levels, between overweight women and those with normal weight are needed.

Keywords: BMI, implantation rate, IVF, obesity, pregnancy rate

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (79.2 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Reid RL, Van Vugt DA. Weight-related changes in reproductive function. Fertil Steril. 1987;48:905–913. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59581-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mokdad AH, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, Bowman BA, Marks JS, Koplan JP. The spread of the obesity epidemic in the United States, 1991-1998. JAMA. 1999;282:1519–1522. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.16.1519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Calle EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, Robriguez C, Heath CW., Jr Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. NEJM. 1999;341:1097–1104. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199910073411501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G, Dietz WH. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA. 1999;282:1523–1529. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.16.1523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Allison DB, Fontaine KR, Manson JE, Stevens J, VanItallie TB. Annual deaths attributable to obesity in the United States. JAMA. 1999;282:1530–1538. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.16.1530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Clark AM, Thornley B, Tomlinson L, Galletley C, Norman RJ. Weight loss in obese infertile women results in improvement in reproductive outcome for all forms of fertility treatment. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1502–1505. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Harlass FE, Plymate SR, Fariss BL, Belts RP. Weight loss is associated with correction of gonadotropin and sex steroid abnormalities in the obese anovulatory female. Fertil Steril. 1984;42:649–652. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48154-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hollmann M, Runnebaum B, Gerhard I. Effects of weight loss on the hormonal profile in obese, infertile women. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1884–1891. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Halme J, Hammond MG, Talber LM, O'Rand M, Bailey L, Sloan C. Positive correlation between body weight, length of human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation, and oocyte fertilization rate. Fertil Steril. 1986;45:372–376. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49219-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lewis CG, Warnes GM, Wand X, Matthews CD. Failure of body mass index or body weight to influence markedly the response to ovarian hyperstimulation in normal cycling women. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:1097–1099. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53594-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Crosignani PG, Ragni G, Parazzini F, Wyssling H, Lombroso G, Perotti L. Anthropometric indicators and response to gonadotrophin for ovulation induction. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:420–423. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wass P, Waldenstrom U, Rossner S, Hellberg D. An android body fat distribution in females impairs the pregnancy rate of in-vitro fertilization embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2057–2060. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.9.2057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lashen H, Ledger W, Lopez-Bernal A, Barlow D. Extremes of body mass do not adversely affect the outcome of superovulation and in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:712–715. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.3.712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wittemer C, Ohl J, Bailly M, Bettahar-Lebugle K, Nisand I. Does body mass index of infertile women have an impact on IVF procedure and outcome? J Assist Reprod Genetics. 2000;17:547–552. doi: 10.1023/A:1026477628723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sharara FI, McClamrock HD. High estradiol levels and high oocyte yield are not detrimental to in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:401–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang JX, Davies M, Norman RJ. Body mass and probability of pregnancy during assisted reproduction treatment: Retrospective study. BMJ. 2000;321:1320–1321. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Leondires MP, Escalpes M, Segars JH, Scott RT, Miller BT. Microdose follicular phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) compared with luteal phase GnRH-a for ovarian stimulation at in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:1018–1023. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00423-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES