Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 2001 Jun;18(6):315–319. doi: 10.1023/A:1016628520543

Clinical Assisted Reproduction: An Analysis of Spontaneous Hatching in a Human Endometrial Epithelial Coculture System: Is Assisted Hatching Justified?

A Mercader 1, C Simón 1,2, A Galán 1, R Herrer 1, C Albert 1, J Remohí 1,2, A Pellicer 1,2
PMCID: PMC3455851  PMID: 11495406

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate spontaneous embryo hatching in an endometrial epithelial coculture system, and compare it with cases where coculture was performed because of maternal age, previous repeated implantation failures, or both. To clarify in which cases assisted hatching would be appropriate.

Methods: Individual human embryos were cocultured on an endometrial epithelial cell monolayer until Day 6.

Results: Blastocyst hatching rate at Day 6, depending on maternal age, was 9.1% (age <37 years) and 3.4% (age ≥37 years). However, blastocyst hatching rates depending on number of previous IVF failures were similar.

Conclusions: Maternal age and previous implantation failures are factors affecting the ability of human embryos to reach the blastocyst stage in coculture. However, assisted hatching is not justified in these populations because of the absence of hatching rate differences between blastocysts obtained from these two groups and the control group.

Keywords: assisted hatching, blastocyst, coculture, implantation

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (53.5 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lopata A, Hay DL. The potential of early human embryos to form blastocysts, hatch from their zona and secrete hCG in culture. Hum Reprod. 1989;4(Suppl):87–94. doi: 10.1093/humrep/4.suppl_1.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dokras A, Sargent IL, Ross C, Gardner RL, Barlow DH. The human blastocyst: Morphology and human chorionic gonadotrophin secretion in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1991;6(8):1143–1151. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Woodward BJ, Lenton EA, Turner K, Grace WF. Embryonic human chorionic gonadotrophin secretion and hatching: Poor correlation with cleavage rate and morphological assessment during preimplantation development in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(10):1909–1914. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hwu YM, Lee RK, Chen CP, Su JT, Chen YW, Lin SP. Development of hatching blastocysts from immature human oocytes following in-vitro maturation and fertilisation using a coculture system. Hum Repord. 1998;13(7):1916–1921. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.7.1916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liu HC, Cohen J, Alikani M, Noyes N, Rosenwaks Z. Assisted hatching facilitates earlier implantation. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(5):871–875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Check JH, Hoover L, Nazari A, O'Shaughnessy A, Summers D. The effect of assisted hatching on pregnacy rates after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(2):254–257. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58080-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hu Y, Hoffman DI, Maxson WS, Ory SJ. Clinical application of non selective assisted hatching of human embryos. Fertil Steril. 1996;66(6):991–994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Meldrum DR, Wisot A, Yee B, Garzo G, Yeo L, Hamilton F. Assisted hatching reduces the age-related decline in IVF outcome in women younger than age 43 without increasing miscarriage or monozygotic twinning. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15(7):418–421. doi: 10.1007/BF02744934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schoolcraft WB, Schelenker T, Jones GS, Jones HW., Jr In vitro fertilization in women age 40 and older: The impact of assisted hatching. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12:581–584. doi: 10.1007/BF02212578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Parikh FR, Kamat SA, Nadkarni S, Arawandekar D, Parikh RM. Assisted hatching in an in vitro fertilization programme. J Reprod Fertil suppl. 1996;50:121–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Magadevan MM, Miller MM, Maris MO, Moutos D. Assisted hatching of embryos by micromanipulation for human in vitro fertilization: UAMS experience. J Ark Med Soc. 1998;94(12):529–531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Meldrum DR, Silverberg KM, Bustillo M, Stokes L. Success rate with repeated cycles of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(6):1005–1009. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00083-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Obruca A, Strohmer H, Sakkas D, Menezo Y, Kogosowski A, Barak Y, Feichtinger W. Use of lasers in assisted fertilization and hatching. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(9):1723–1726. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chao KH, Chen SU, Chen HF, Wu MY, Yang YS, Ho HN. Assisted hatching increases the implantation and pregnancy rate of in vitro fertilisation (IVF)-embryo transfer (ET), but no that of IVF-tubal ET in patients with repeated IVF failures. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(5):904–908. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81404-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schoolcraft WB, Schelenker T, Gee M, Jones GS, Jones HW., Jr Assisted hatching in the treatment of poor prognosis in vitro fertilization candidates. Fertil Steril. 1994;62(3):551–554. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56944-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stein A, Rufas O, Avrech SAO, Pinkas H, Ovadia J, Fisch B. Assisted hatching by partial zona dissection of human preembryos in patients with recurrent implantation failure after in vitro fertilisation. Fertil Steril. 1995;63(4):838–841. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57490-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Antinori S, Selman HA, Caffa B, Panci C, Dani GL, Versaci C. Zona opening of human embryos using a non-contact UV laser for assisted hatching in patients with poor prognosis of pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(11):2488–2492. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Fortini D, Aicardi G, Montanaro N. Rescue of implantation potential in embryos with poor prognosis by assisted zona hatching. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(5):1331–1335. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.5.1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tucker MJ, Morton PC, Wright G, Ingargiola PE, Sweitzer CL, Elsner CW, Mitchell-Leef DE, Massey JB. Enhancement of outcome from intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Does coculture or assisted hatching improve implantation rates? Hum Reprod. 1996;11(11):2434–2437. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hellebaut S, De Sutter P, Dozortsev D, Onghena A, Qian C, Dhont M. Does assisted hatching improve implantation rates after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection in all patients? A prospective randomized study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996;13(1):19–22. doi: 10.1007/BF02068864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hurst BS, Tucker KE, Awoniyi CA, Schlaff WD. Assisted hatching does not enhance IVF success in good-prognosis patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15(2):62–64. doi: 10.1007/BF02766826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bider D, Livshits A, Yonish M, Yemini Z, Mashiach S, Dor J. Assisted hatching by zona drilling in human embryos in women of advanced age. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(2):317–320. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.2.317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lanzendorf SE, Nehchiri F, Mayer JF, Oehninger S, Muasher SJ. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study for the evaluation of assisted hatching in patients with advanced maternal age. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(2):409–413. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.2.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cohen J, Elsner C, Kort H, Malter H, Massey J, Mayer MP, Wiemer K. Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation by assisted hatching using micromanipulation. Hum Reprod. 1990;5(1):7–13. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tucker MJ, Ingargiola PE, Massey JB, Morton PC, Wiemer KE, Wiker SR, Wright G. Assisted hatching with or without bovine oviductal ephitelial cell coculture for poor prognosis in-vitro fertilization patients. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(8):1528–1531. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wiemer KE, Hu Y, Cuervo M, Genetis P, Leibowitz D. The combination of coculture and selective assisted hatching: results from their clinical application. Fertil Steril. 1994;61(1):105–110. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56461-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nijs N, Vanderzwalmen P, Segal-Bertin G, Geerts L, Van Roosendaal E, Segal L, Schoysman-Deboeck A, Schoysman R. Amonozygotic twin pregnancy after application of zona rubbing on a frozen-thawed blastocyst. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(1):127–129. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Alikani M, Noyes N, Cohen J, Rosenwaks Z. Monozygotic twinning in the human is associated with the zona pellucida architecture. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(7):1318–1321. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Slotnick RN, Ortega JE. Monoamniotic twinning and zona manipulation: A survey of U.S. centers correlating zona manipulation procedures and risk twinning frequency. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996;13:381–385. doi: 10.1007/BF02066168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hershlag A, Paine T, Cooper GW, Scholl GM, Rawlinson K, Kvapil G. Monozygotic twinning associated with mechanical assisted hatching. Fertil Steril. 1999;71(1):144–146. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00402-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Simó n C, Mercader A, García-Velasco J, Nikas G, Moreno C, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Coculture of human embryos with autologous human endometrial epithelial cells in patients with implantation failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(8):2638–2646. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.8.5873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES