Abstract
This study assessed whether reuse of the female condom was acceptable among two groups of women in central Johannesburg, South Africa, who were taking part in two separate studies of female condom reuse. The first group consisted of women (aged 17 to 43years) attending a family planning/sexually transmitted infections (STIs) clinic who were participating in a cross-sectional survey of the acceptability of female condoms reuse (n=100). The second group included women (aged 18–40 years) at high risk for STI (80% self-declared sex workers) who were taking part in an ongoing cohort study to investigate the safety of reuse of the female condom through a structural integrity and microbial retention study (n=50). Among women participating in the acceptability study, 83% said that they would be willing to reuse the female condom, and 91% thought the idea of reuse, of the female condom was acceptable. All women taking part in the safety of reuse study and who reused the female condom up to seven time (n=49) reported that the steps involved in reusing the device were easy to perform and acceptable. All 49 women said they would reuse the female condom at least once, while 45% said they would use it a maximum of seven or eight times. From the results of the interviews with both study groups, it can be concluded that, among women in a South African urban environment who have used a male and/or female condom, the concept of reuse of the female condom is acceptable and thought to be a good idea.
Keywords: Acceptability, Female condom, Reuse, South Africa
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (110.0 KB).
References
- 1.Piloting the Female Condom in Zimbabwe. A National Survey. Zimbabwe: Ministry of Health and Child Welfare; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nkrumah-Mills G. Acceptability of the female condom (Femidom) in Asuogyaman District. London, UK: Chartex; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Blogg J, Blogg S. Acceptability of the female condom (Femidom) within a population of commercial sex workers and couples in Salima and Nkhotakota, Malawi. London: Female Health Company; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Monney-Lobey M, Tchupo JP, Turk T, Joanis C, Steiner M. Acceptability of the female condom among a high risk population in Cameroon. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International; 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Niang C. Sexual negotiations and the use of women's condom in Kolda and Loalack. Senegal Dakar. London: Female Health Company; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pettifor AE, Beksinska ME, Rees VH, Kleinschmidt I, McIntyre JA. In-vitro assessment of the structural integrity of the female condom after multiple wash, dry and re-lubrication cycles. Contraception. 2000;61:271–276. doi: 10.1016/S0010-7824(00)00103-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Joanis C, Latka M, Glover L, Hamel S. Structural integrity of the female condom after a single use, washing and disinfection. Contraception. 2000;62:63–72. doi: 10.1016/S0010-7824(00)00142-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Beksinska ME, Rees H, Dickson-Tetteh KE, Mqoqi N, Kleinschmidt I, McIntyre JA. Structural integrity of the female condom after multiple uses, washing, drying and relubrication. Contraception. 2001;63:33–36. doi: 10.1016/S0010-7824(00)00192-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rees VH, Beksinska ME, Dickson-Tetteh KE, Mqoqi N, McIntyre JA. The Re-use of the Female Condom, a Multi-phased Study. Technical report to WHO; June 2000.
- 10.Beksinska ME, Rees VH, McIntyre JA, Wilkinson D. The acceptability of the female condom in different groups of women in South Africa: a multi-centered study to inform the National Female Condom Introductory Strategy. S Afr Med J. 2001;91:672–678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sai F, Rees H, McGarry S. Reproductive Health and Family Planning, National Review and Recommendations Final Report. Johannesburg, South Africa: Commission of the European Communities Special Programmes for South Africa; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. Diaphragms and Cervical Caps. 1995.
- 13.Townsend S. Seeking HIV Prevention Strategies for Women. Network.May 1993. [PubMed]
- 14.Ray S, Bassett M, Maposhere C, et al Acceptability of the female condom in Zimbabwe: positive but male centered responses. Reprod Health Matters. 1995:494–503.
- 15.Feldblum P, Joanis C. Modern Barrier Methods: Effective Contraception and Disease Prevention. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ravindran T K, Rao SSIs the diaphragm a suitable method of contraception for lowincome women: a user perspective study. In: Beyond Acceptability: Users' Perspectives on Contraception. Reprod Health Matters. 1997.
- 17.South Africa Demographic and Health Survey. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Health; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mbizvo M, Bassett M. Reproductive health and AIDS prevention in sub-Saharan Africa: the case for increased male participation. Health Policy Plann. 1996;11:84–92. doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.1.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Matshidze P. Male involvement program. Paper presented at: Third Reproductive Health Priorities Conference; August 18–22, 1997; George, South Africa.
- 20.Chimere-Dan O. Contraceptive prevalence in rural South Africa. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996;22:2–9. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pham-Kanter G, Steinberg M, Ballard R. Sexually transmitted diseases in South Africa. Genitourinary Med. 1996;72:160–71. doi: 10.1136/sti.72.3.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]