Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine logoLink to Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
. 2001 Sep;78(3):495–507. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.495

Can communities and academia work together on public health research? Evaluation results from a community-based participatory research partnershipin detroit

Paula M Lantz 1,✉, Edna Viruell-Fuentes 1, Barbara A Israel 1, Donald Softley 2, Ricardo Guzman 3
PMCID: PMC3455911  PMID: 11564852

Abstract

This article reports the results of a formative evaluation of the first 4 years of the Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center (URC), a community-based participatory research partnership that was founded in 1995 with core funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Several organizations are members of this partnership, including a university, six community-based organizations, a city health department, a health care system, and CDC. The Detroit URC is a strong partnership that has accomplished many of its goals, including the receipt of over $11 million in funding for 12 community-based participatory research projects during its initial 4 years. Detroit URC Board members identified a number of facilitating factors for their growth and achievements, such as (1) developing a sound infrastructure and set of processes for making decisions and working together, (2) building trust among partners, (3) garnering committed and active leadership from community partners, and (4) receiving support from CDC. Board members also identified a number of ongoing challenges, including organizational constraints, time pressures, and balancing community interests in interventions and academic research needs. Overall, the Detroit URC represents a partnership approach to identifying community health concerns and implementing potential solutions.

Keywords: Coalitions, Community-based participatory research, Evaluation, Intervention research, Participatory action research

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (97.2 KB).

References

  • 1.Lasker RD, Weiss ES, Miller R. Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. Milbank Q. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Bruce T A, McKane SU, editors. Community-Based Public Health: a Partnership Model. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wallerstein NM, Bernstein E, eds. Community empowerment, participatory education and health—part I Health Educ Q. 1994;21:141–268. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5.Macaulay AC, Commanda LE, Freeman WL, et al. Participatory research maximizes community and lay involvement. North American Primary Care Research Group. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):774–778. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(12):1667–1676. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stokols D. Establishing and maintaining health environmens: toward a social ecology of health promotion. J Community Psychol. 1992;47:6–22. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.47.1.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Krieger N, Rowley DL, Herman A, Avery B, Phillips M. Racism, sexism and social class: implications for studies of health, disease and well-being. Am J Prev Med. 1993;9(6 suppl):82–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Williams DA, Collins J. US socioeconomic and racial differences in health: patterns and explanations. Annu Rev Sociol. 1995;21:349–386. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.002025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Freudenberg N. Community-based health education for urban populations: an overview. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25(1):11–23. doi: 10.1177/109019819802500103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Link BG, Phelan JC. Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. J Health Soc Behav. 1995; (extra issue):80–94. [PubMed]
  • 12.Parker EA, Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Hollis B. Detroit's East Side Village Health Worker Partnership: community-based lay health advisor intervention in an urban area. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25(1):24–45. doi: 10.1177/109019819802500104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Selig SM, Bayer IS, Griffin CB. Development and implementation of principles for community-based research in public health. In: MacNair RH, editor. Research Strategies for Community Practice. New York: Haworth Press; 1998. pp. 83–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Israel BA, Lichtenstein R, Lantz PM, et al. The Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center: lessons learned in the development, implementation and evaluation of a community-based participatory research partnership. J Public Health Manage Pract. In press. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15.Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1998. Axial Coding; pp. 123–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990. Qualitative analysis and interpretation; pp. 371–460. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Israel BA, Becker AB, Maciak BJ, Hollis R. Conducting a participatory community-based survey: collecting and interpreting data for a community health intervention on Detroit's East Side. J Public Health Manage Pract. 1998;4(2):10–24. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199803000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Maciak BJ, Guzman R, Santiago A, Villalobos G, Israel BA. Establishing LA VIDA—a community-based partnership to prevent intimate partner violence against Latina women. Health Educ Behav. 1999;26(6):821–840. doi: 10.1177/109019819902600606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wallerstein N. Power between evaluator and community: research relationships within New Mexico's healthier communities. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:39–53. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00073-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Butterfoss FD, Goodman RM, Wandersman A. Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Educ Res. 1993;8(3):315–330. doi: 10.1093/her/8.3.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Alter C, Hage J. Organizations Working Together: Coordination in Interorganizational Networks. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Florin P, Mitchell R, Stevenson J. Identifying training and technical assistance needs in community coalitions: a developmental approach. Health Educ Res. 1993;8(3):417–432. doi: 10.1093/her/8.3.417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chrislip DD, Larson CE. Collaborative Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Taylor-Powell E, Rossing B, Geran J. Evaluating Collaboratives: Reaching the Potential. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Extension; 1998. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine are provided here courtesy of New York Academy of Medicine

RESOURCES