Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine logoLink to Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
. 2001 Sep;78(3):419–432. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.419

The risk environment for HIV transmission: Results from the Atlanta and Flagstaff network studies

Richard Rothenberg 1,✉, Julie Baldwin 2, Robert Trotter 2, Stephen Muth 3
PMCID: PMC3455916  PMID: 11564846

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission may be facilitated or obstructed by network structure, incorporating a measure of risk that combines true risk and surrogates. Persons at presumed high risk for HIV were enrolled in long-term follow-up studies of urban and rural networks in Atlanta, Georgia, and Flagstaff, Arizona. We focused on respondents who were also contacts to evaluate information on both sides of the observed dyads and constructed a Risk Indicator, based on a four-digit binary number, that permitted assessment and visualization of the overall risk environment. We constructed graphs that provided visualization of the level of risk, the types of relationships, and the actual network. Although some of the findings conform to the hypotheses relating network structure to transmission, there were several anomalies. In Atlanta, HIV prevalence was most strongly related to men with a male sexual orientation, despite the widespread use of injectable drugs. In Flagstaff, an area of very low prevalence and no transmission, the risk environment appeared more intense, and the frequency of microstructures was as great or greater than representative areas in Atlanta. The network hypothesis is not yet sufficiently developed to account for empirical observations that demonstrate the presence of intense, interactive networks in the absence of transmission of HIV.

Keywords: HIV, Risks, Social networks, Transmission dynamics

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (293.5 KB).

References

  • 1.Goodman SN. P values, hypothesis tests, and likelihood: implications for epidemiology of a neglected historical debate. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:485–496. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Greenland S. Randomization, statistics, and causal inference. Epidemiology. 1990;1:421–429. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199011000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Feinstein AR. P-values and confidence intervals: two sides of the same unsatisfactory coin. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(4):355–360. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00295-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Feinstein AR. Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life. Science. 1988;242:1257–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.3057627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Savitz DZ, Greenland S, Stolley PD, Kelsey JL. Scientific standards of criticism: a reaction to “Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life,” by A. R. Feinstein. Epidemiology. 1990;1:78–83. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Taubes G. Epidemiology faces its limits. Science. 1995;269:164–169. doi: 10.1126/science.7618077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Garnett GP, Anderson RM. Factors controlling the spread of HIV in heterosexual communities in developing countries: patterns of mixing between different age and sexual activity classes. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 1993;342:137–159. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1993.0143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rothenberg RB. Model trains of thought. Sex Transm Dis. 1998;24:201–203. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199704000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Klovdahl AS. Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: the AIDS example. Soc Sci Med. 1985;21(11):1203–1216. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90269-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Friedman SR, Neaigus A, Jose B, et al. Sociometric risk networks and risk for HIV infection. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1289–1296. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.87.8.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Potterat JJ, Rothenberg RB, Muth SQ. Network structural dynamics and infectious disease propagation. Int J STD AIDS. 1999;10:182–185. doi: 10.1258/0956462991913853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Potterat JJ, Phillips-Plummer L, Muth SQ, et al. Risk network structure in the early epidemic phase of HIV transmission in Colorado Springs. Sex Transm Infect. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Potterat JJ, Muth SQ, Rothenberg RB, et al. Sexual network structure as indicator of epidemic phase. Sex Transm Infect. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Rothenberg RB, Potterat JJ, Woodhouse DE, Muth SQ, Darrow WW, Klovdahl AS. Social network dynamics and HIV transmission. AIDS. 1998;12:1529–1536. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199812000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rothenberg RB, Long D, Sterk C, et al. The Atlanta urban networks study: a blueprint for endemic transmission. AIDS. 2001;14:2191–2200. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200009290-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wylie JL, Jolly A. Patterns of chlamydia and gonorrhea infection in sexual networks in Manitoba, Canada. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28(1):14–24. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200101000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mastro TD, Vincenzi I. Probabilities of sexual HIV-1 transmission. AIDS. 1996;10(suppl A):S75–S82. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199601001-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Royce RA, Sena A, Cates W, Cohen MS. Sexual transmission of HIV. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(15):1072–1078. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199704103361507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vittinghoff E, Bucbinder SP, Judson F, Douglas JMD, MacQueen K. Per contact risk for transmission of HIV associated with four types of homosexual contact. Paper presented at: Fifth Conference on Retrovirus and Opportunistic Infections; February 1–5, 1998; Chicago, IL.
  • 20.Borgatti SP, Everett M, Freeman L. Ucinet V for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Natick, MA: Analytic Technologies; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Krackhardt D, Blythe J, McGrath C. Krackplot. Version 3.0. Pittsburgh, Pa: Analytic Technologies; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Garnett GP, Hughes JP, Anderson RM, et al. Sexual mixing patterns of patients attending sexually transmitted diseases clinics. Sex Transm Dis. 1996;23(3):248–257. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199605000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gupta S, Anderson RM, May RM. Networks of sexual contacts: implications for the pattern of spread of HIV. AIDS. 1989;3:807–817. doi: 10.1097/00002030-198912000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kretzschmar M, Morris M. Measures of concurrency in networks and the spread of infectious disease. Math Biosci. 1996;133:165–195. doi: 10.1016/0025-5564(95)00093-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Morris M, Kretzschmar M. Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV. AIDS. 1997;11:641–648. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199705000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kretzschmar M. Sexual network structure and sexually transmitted disease prevention: a modeling perspective. Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27(10):627–635. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200011000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Anderson RM, Garnett GP. Mathematical models of the transmission and control of sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;27(10):636–643. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200011000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Service SK, Blower SM. HIV transmission in sexual networks: an empirical analysis. Proc R Soc London B. 1995;260:237–244. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gladwell M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. New York: Little Brown and Company; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Janssen R. Serostatus approach to fighting the HIV epidemic (SAFE): a new prevention strategy to reduce transmission. Paper presented at: Eighth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infection: February 4, 2001; Chicago, IL.
  • 31.DesJarlais DC, Friedman SR. HIV epidemiology and interventions among injecting drug users. Int J STD AIDS. 1996;7(suppl 2):57–61. doi: 10.1258/0956462961917654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Patrick DM, Strathdee SA, Archibald CP, et al. Determinants of HIV seroconversion in injection drug users during a period of rising prevalence in Vancouver. Int J STD AIDS. 1997;8(7):437–445. doi: 10.1258/0956462971920497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.DesJarlais DC, Marmor M, Friedmann P, et al. HIV incidence among injection drug users in New York City, 1992–1997: evidence for a declining epidemic. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(3):352–359. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.90.3.352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Laumann EO, Youm Y. Racial/ethnic group differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: a network explanation. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:250–261. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199905000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rothenberg RB, Trotter RT, Sterk C, Baldwin JA, Pach A, Maxwell C. Heterogeneity in drug-using networks. Paper presented at: 12th World AIDS Conference; June 28–July 3, 1998; Geneva, Switzerland.

Articles from Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine are provided here courtesy of New York Academy of Medicine

RESOURCES